I don't hate Jimmy Carter.
He is no longer a Southern Baptist. He is CBF. Enough said.
So you're against him because he's not a Southern Baptist? Did you support him when he was?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't hate Jimmy Carter.
He is no longer a Southern Baptist. He is CBF. Enough said.
The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by Nelson Mandela, who offer their collective influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity.
Aug. 31, 2009 Rosalynn and I arrived in Jerusalem before the other Elders, and on Monday we met with Ahmed Tiki...
That evening we joined Elders Desmond Tutu, Fernando Cardoso, Ela Bhatt, Mary Robinson, and Gro Brundtland, and CEO Mabel van Oranje. Our purpose was to learn as much as possible about the complex region in order to use our influence to promote human rights and the ongoing peace process.
The Elders do not represent any government or official agency, and the group is not involved as mediators or negotiators. Before leaving our hotel in East Jerusalem, we sent a brief report of our observations to President Barack Obama, who has assumed the difficult role of leading the peace effort in the region.
Carter is nothing more than a has-been socialist with an acute case of verbal diarrhea that is cringing at his growing monumental irrelevance!
Let's try this example. (It's likely a waste of time, but maybe a miracle will happen):
I'm a hospital administrator. I have two candidates for heart surgeon. One is an outstanding surgeon...but I am unsure about his faith. The other is a good Christian, as well as a med school dropout. Am I a pagan for voting for candidate #1?
Just because someone is a Christian does not mean they are cut out for the job.
President Carter is a Nobel Peace Prize winner. He's done a great deal for poor people through his Habitat for Humanity program. But he's a Democrat so you bad mouth him.
Bumped, yet again...to see if alatide will deal with the issues raised.
He taught Sunday School classes before, during, and after his presidency. What do you think the odds are that George W Bush will EVER do that?
There is only one response that is appropriate.Former President Jimmy Carter on Thursday softened his claim that an "overwhelming portion" of criticism toward President Obama is race-based.
Carter said in an interview that he was only talking about a "fringe element" when he made the controversial remarks two weeks ago.
"I said those that had a personal attack on President Obama as a person, that was tinged with racism," Carter told CNN. "But I recognize that people that disagree with him on health care or the environment, that the vast majority of those are not tinged with racism."
There is only one response that is appropriate.
"Mr. President.... you lie!"
"You lie" when you made your race-baiting comments.
"You lie" now, trying to re-write history about your race-baiting comments.
Imagine, the Nobel peace prize going to a man whose race-baiting comments devide the nation, creating more strife and hatred between the races.
peace to youraying:
Nationally, 43% of all white voters voted for Obama,
In the deep South (Alabama, Miss., LA) the white vote for Obama was about 10-15%, and in Georgia, SC and Texas about 25%.
There is very definitely a pattern here. One explanation might be racial prejudice.
How can you say definitively that that is a LIE? What's YOUR evidence?
Nationally, 43% of all white voters voted for Obama,
In the deep South (Alabama, Miss., LA) the white vote for Obama was about 10-15%, and in Georgia, SC and Texas about 25%.
There is very definitely a pattern here. One explanation might be racial prejudice.
How can you say definitively that that is a LIE? What's YOUR evidence?
Every can choose their surgeon using their own criteria. That is of course if you have insurance but then the insurance company will restrict your choice. I had an aortic aneurysm repaired which was right next to my heart. I myself did not ask my surgeon what his religion was. I did check his background and reputation and talked to two people in my church who knew him. One had been operated on by him and the other had worked with him as an anesthesiologist. All spoke very highly of him and I was very pleased with the outcome.
My twin brother had the same condition but didn't actually have much choice because he didn't have health insurance due to pastoring a very poor church for 7 years for almost no money and no benefits. Let me rephrase that. He got a LOT of benefits but no insurance. His heart surgeon was a good Christian man and performed the surgery free because of his support for my brother’s ministry. My brother also had an excellent outcome.
We're talking about politics here. I think the same general principle applies. My first choice in each case would be the best person for the job and also a confessing Christian. My second choice would be the best person for the job. Since I really didn't see any real difference in the faith of the two candidates in the last election, I voted for the best man.
What I have difficulty accepting is people who say they want Christian leaders but what they really mean is they want Republican leaders who also appear to be Christian. In Jimmy Carter's case, I voted for the highly skilled Christian.
Jimmy Carter has shown through his actions after leaving the White House that he really cares about people in need. Has any other post WW2 president done as much after leaving the White House? Not that I can see. Jimmy Carter was the first president to confess that he is a born again Christian. He taught Sunday School classes before, during, and after his presidency. What do you think the odds are that George W Bush will EVER do that?
There is very definitely a pattern here. One explanation might be racial prejudice.
How can you say definitively that that is a LIE? What's YOUR evidence?
So...opposing Obama means one is a racist?
You call that "evidence?"
What a profoundly ridiculous supposition.
I could point out that many of the "racists" you accuse would gladly support a black candidate who wasn't in favor of the takeover of our private lives by the federal government.
But then that would mess up your rant, and your duct-taped reality you have managed to construct...
Much like Dr. Alan Keys a Constitutional Scholar
Many in the South did not vote for President Obama because of his politics and not his skin color. Black, white, pink, purple doesn't matter to me. If they are liberal in their politics I'm not going to vote for them no matter how many Sunday School classes they have taught, no matter how many Habitat houses they have built, and no matter how many times they have said "I am a born again Christian." Some folks just can't help but to see the majority of white Southerners wearing a white hood every Saturday night. And, the sad thing is that many southern yellow dog democrats perpetuate this stereotype. By the way Tidy, please keep it up. Your helping out tremendously.