christmas has NOTHING to do with the Jesus of the Bible
The celebration of the incarnation of God has EVERYTHING to do with Christ, God-With-Us.
The Church didn't have a fixed date, so it established one which would prevent luke-warm converts to the faith from praciticing their old faith on top of their Christian faith. They couldn't be in two temples at once, so you either celebrated Christmas or Saturnalia. THAT is why DEC 25th is the day we celebrate
the Mass of Christ.
The winter solstice, the shortest day of the year, (when the pagans believed the sun god "Baal" received his rebirth because the days started becoming longer) was the holiest of all the pagan holidays.
St. Patrick of Ireland used pagan imagry such as the Celtic Cross and the Shamrock to explain things like the death and resurrection of Christ and the Trinity.
Throughout Christian History it has been permissable to use pagan imagry and "baptise" it to give it a Christian slant making it understandable to the Pagans. St. Paul did jsut this at the Areopagus in Acts 18. He even called the Pagan's PIOUS for having a temple to an Unknown God, and then proceeded to use that unknown God as a way to explain the one, true God, our heavenly Father.
Just because Pagans did something that Christians later did, does not mean that the Christians are unjustified or wrong.
She told that Nimrod had became a spiritual being, Baal the sun god. She said, only by praying through her could you reach Nimrod.
She called herself the Queen of Heaven. (Jeremiah 7:19)
Baal was a male deity, I'm pretty sure.
The custom became to set up the evergreen tree in your home, decorate it with shiny ornaments, and wait for Nimrod to leave presents under it,
Now you're just making stuff up, and confusing the holiday of Yule with ancient and vague forms of Pagan worship.
and believing in Saint Nick.
St. Nicholas was very real.
I just wish we didn't have to wrap it up in re-used pagan holidays.
What about wedding rings. Those are pagan symbols of marriage...should we get rid of those too?
Christians was a name given them by the pagans.
Indeed, they prefered the term "catholic", in common use by the turn of the year 100AD
""Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist which is celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains [i.e., a presbyter]. Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2 [A.D. 110]).
- St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch
You are correct. There is no authorization in the NT for Christians to celebrate the birth of Christ.
Similarly there is no authorization in the New Testament to have a 27 book NT either...must be a pagan invention...
A simple return to the NT as the sole authority would clear all of that stuff up.
Certainly...first, can we find the NT passage which says that the NT or even the entire body of Scriptures are the sole authorities for the Christian?