Tom Bryant said:
We have men who carry, but security involves more than just an armed response to a shooter.
Yep. What I described is simply a portion of our plan.
There must be someone trained to watch for people coming in late to a service and walking down front as was the case. It starts at the front door and the best security is what people don't see in terms of watchful men and women.
At the same time, it's very hard to respond to someone who hasn't done anything yet. We have to be welcoming of visitors and troubled persons while maintaining vigilence. In any case, our ultimate "security" comes from God, but we don't need to presume upon his grace by not being prepared.
The problem with an armed response is that too often innocents get it because at a church service there will be men trying to stop the assailant while someone else is trying to shot him.
I'm not sure there are many incidents of innocents getting shot by licensed responders... It would stand to reason that there might be (the anti-gun folks always talk about it, but they can't seem to bring forth any examples). However, I'll grant you that it can happen.
But shooting someone is often not the answer. If the shooter is close enough to me, I'd probably just physically take him down and disarm him with brute force.
Unless the men who are firing are trained marksmen who have been trained in firing a weapon in stress related circumstances there is a very poor chance that they will really hit what they are aimed at.
In CHL classes in Texas, the competency test is nerve-wracking. You have a very short window of opportunity to shoot and you fail if you miss it. I'm very comfortable shooting my pistol from a ready (non-aiming) position and putting a bullet in the bulls-eye, and most of the people in my CHL class were of a similar proficiency. Speaking for myself, I tend to keep my head in emergencies (I tend to get very calm and shut down emotions to work the problem -- I "stress out" and fall apart a few hours later) and have worked as a first responder in other types of situations.
That being said, most police officers have trouble hitting the target in high-stress situations, so there are no guarantees. However, I'm sure no one is interested in disarming police officers.
Police forces have a variety of means that train their people in firing under stress. Just because someone has a carry permit doesn't mean that they can fire a weapon when innocents are around.
That's true, but a number of people who have carry permits are more skilled than you might imagine... especially former police, government agents, and ex-military.