Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have no problem with the concept of protecting the local church. There are two issues in my mind that would have to be resolved before implementing such a plan. One, what do the state and local laws say? and two, is there really a person in the congregation who knows how to use a weapon well enough under a stressful situation that has a reasonable chance of hitting the target and not wounding or killing an innocent member? Former police and military police or security is good experience. Hunting is sometimes, but not always. As far as the concealed weapons class for a license goes, if one cannot hit the target thay require you to pass before you get your license, you need to have your eyes checked. So this is not always enough either.Tom Butler said:Baptist Press carried an article on this subject today, by David Roach, writer for Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=30078
The article quotes two security officers with some tips I hadn't thought of before. There's obviously more to this than just strapping a .38 police special on your belt.
A couple of points:
There needs to be a plan in place.
Security officers should sit in specific places.
What should the pastor do if someone comes down the aisle in the middle of the service?
Local Police and Sheriff's Departments sometimes will be delighted to provide help with emergency planning.
Think about installing security cameras with recording capabilities.
David Roach's article also recommends two books on the subject: "Keeping Your Church Safe" by Ron Agular, and "An Introduction to Security and Emergency Planning for Faith-Based Organizations" by Jeffrey Hawkins.
abcgrad94 said:We have a man who is armed at church. It doesn't bother me at all. In fact, I feel safer knowing he is there and prepared to deal with any potential threat. We have had drug users and bums walk into the church during services and you never know their intentions.
preachinjesus said:I'm personally against any kind of violence or retaliation on the part of Christians. God has taught us not to be avengers. Christ healed the man whose ear had been cut off by one of his disciples.
As soon as I heard this sad story I immediately shuddered at how many churches would soon allow some members to begin carrying firearms into their sactuaries and in the halls. I was sad. While we can, and should, encourage appropriate security measures by vigilant people we should never condone the carrying of weapons as a defensive measure.
Just my opinion. Again I say it having served in two churches where the senior pastor was guarded by at least two armed guards because of his noteriety and (in one case) over realized sense of self.
How many accidental shootings will it take to shift public opinion the other way? It seems to me the greatest testimony of a church community is what happened with the Amish shootings several years ago, and how this church is acting in light of the more recent tragedy.
Tom Butler said:The article quotes two security officers with some tips I hadn't thought of before. There's obviously more to this than just strapping a .38 police special on your belt.
A couple of points:
There needs to be a plan in place.
Security officers should sit in specific places.
What should the pastor do if someone comes down the aisle in the middle of the service?
Local Police and Sheriff's Departments sometimes will be delighted to provide help with emergency planning.
Think about installing security cameras with recording capabilities.
Certainly the same scenario CAN play out that way, but often it does not. Think back to the Wedgwood Baptist Church shootings here in Fort Worth. The gunman had a couple of minutes to shoot and murder while people were pinned down. A couple of minutes is certainly time to evaluate the situation and take appropriate action.blackbird said:The same scenero can be played out with "armed" men in church-----the "shooter" will come in---draw his weapon---shoot whoever---and it'll be over with before anyone can count to three-------and the "duffus" armed guard didn't have time to draw his weapon
Sorry, but your memory is faulty: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14817480/detail.htmlpreachinjesus said:I also reflect to the shooting at the New Life Church in Colorado about a year ago where (I believe) that shooter's gun also jammed before he could do more harm. That said I do realize the implication about an armed security force that goes with it. But isn't the point an interesting one?
Your points are valid. I've checked Kentucky law. I think one may carry a weapon, but may not conceal it without a permit.saturneptune said:I have no problem with the concept of protecting the local church. There are two issues in my mind that would have to be resolved before implementing such a plan. One, what do the state and local laws say? and two, is there really a person in the congregation who knows how to use a weapon well enough under a stressful situation that has a reasonable chance of hitting the target and not wounding or killing an innocent member? Former police and military police or security is good experience. Hunting is sometimes, but not always. As far as the concealed weapons class for a license goes, if one cannot hit the target thay require you to pass before you get your license, you need to have your eyes checked. So this is not always enough either.
RevGKG said:So as a Christian we should never call the police when we are the victim of a crime, especially a violent crime? Or in the name of being non-avengers we allow the criminal to go about his way.
AJ, our church welcomes everyone as is. My concern is for the safety of our church members when strangers come in, because you don't know their intentions for coming and whether or not they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. I'm not trying to pick on the homeless or jobless and if I sounded holier-than-thou I apologize.ajg1959 said:Actually my church invites drug users and "bums" in to hear the gospel. Isnt church where they should be? What are the requirements to attend your church?
Let me just say this. If I had to find a church that expected me to already be fixed before I went in, then I would still be lost.
What is a "bum" anyway? I am currently looking for a job...does being unemployed make me a bum? What about mentally ill people that are homeless? Some of them cant work, and have noone to care for them...are they "bums"?
After all, we were all something else before we became christians.
Back to the OP....law abiding folk should be able to go armed anywhere, including church.
AJ
abcgrad94 said:AJ, our church welcomes everyone as is. My concern is for the safety of our church members when strangers come in, because you don't know their intentions for coming and whether or not they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. I'm not trying to pick on the homeless or jobless and if I sounded holier-than-thou I apologize.
In the past we had a guy under the influence of drugs wander inside for the purpose of stealing. He thought he could wander around the building while the rest of us were in the sanctuary. Another time this same person pulled a gun on me on the church's front porch and I had to talk to him calmly and diffuse the situation.
So, if I seems a little paranoid, please understand this is where I'm coming from on the subject.
Baptist Believer said:I can certainly understand the sentiment, but are we not also called to protect those who cannot protect themselves? Unless you are a total passivist (reject war, self-defensive, police forces, government order by force), I’m not sure how you can draw a hard and fast objection to all forms of response.
Baptist Believer said:I don’t think anyone has been talking about vengeance... just ending a situation before others get hurt.
Baptist Believer said:For what it’s worth, most of the time when a CHL holder pulls a weapon (a rare thing in itself), the incident ends without the weapon being used. It actually prevents violence because people don’t like to get shot. If you try to fight someone by hand, you will usually have more injury to innocents and well as the perpetrator.
Baptist Believer said:What we have been talking about (spree killers and persons who are mentally ill) are usually going to take their life at the end of their rampage anyway.
Baptist Believer said:Should we discourage people from using their bodies as weapons to forcibly take down people who are harming innocents?
Baptist Believer said:Everyone who takes a CHL course (at least in Texas) has extensive training on the proper and legal use of force, and it’s only used as a last resort. But when someone comes into a room and starts shooting people, it’s pretty clear that you need to resolve the situation quickly.
Baptist Believer said:Texas passed the law, and nothing of the sort happened. In fact, crime went down. Furthermore, conceal carry holders have stopped many acts of violence before they became much worse. I realized I was wrong and reconsidered the real evidence. And for various reasons, I have personally become trained and licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
Baptist Believer said:The Amish did well, but there is more than one manifestation of the way a church can honor and express the Kingdom of God.
RevGKG said:So as a Christian we should never call the police when we are the victim of a crime, especially a violent crime? Or in the name of being non-avengers we allow the criminal to go about his way.
Tom Butler said:What kind of security measures would you suggest?
I agree with this view. There's no Biblical issue with "rendering unto Caesar" the responsibility to protect the populace through the use of police protection. Jesus preached, however, that Christians should love their enemies and turn the other cheek when attacked.preachinjesus said:I'm not suggesting that Christians don't act accordingly with the law. Particularly when there has been a violent tragedy we have an obligation to seek out authorities and allow them to do the work that the God has given the state to do.
Nor am I suggesting that if you see a criminal walking down the street you don't try to find a police officer to pacify him.
What I am precisely saying is that there is, imho, no allowance for violent retaliation from Christians under the New Covenant.
We should allow the State to use the power granted by God. But the Church should never endorse nor applaud the use of warfare or violence as a means of accomplishing the Kingdom of God.
But can't I dodge bullets and out run an explosion like jet Li? Oh man... you've ruined my day.preachinjesus said:...
Besides, and this comes from experience and after counseling many in law enforcement post shootings, "shoot outs" usually only last a few seconds and are over before most armed security can even draw their weapons. Life happens faster than Hollywood wants us to believe.
Taking security measures to protect yourself against danger is NOT retaliation.preachinjesus said:What I am precisely saying is that there is, imho, no allowance for violent retaliation from Christians under the New Covenant.
We should allow the State to use the power granted by God. But the Church should never endorse nor applaud the use of warfare or violence as a means of accomplishing the Kingdom of God.