communists leading our Universities

So we have gone from the schools being run by communists, to schools being run by the radical left, to schools being run by Democrats.

Should the title of the thread be - "Democrats leading our universities?"

 

Please note BIR, I wrote two paragraphs. A new paragraph generally denotes a change in subject or emphasis. I made two different points. So kiss off!

 

BiR, are you feelin' the love!

 

Taking a page from BIR, prove there is a difference!

 

With the fall of communism in the Soviet Union, it turned out ten or fifteen years ago that the lasts communists left in the world were Commandant Fidel Castro and American university professors.

Freedom Cause is correct in pointing this out.

 

Valid point CMG

 

Which school? Which class? Which teacher? Which pornographic material?

 

When a conservastive student group at the University of Texas in Austin put out a list of professors who they considered to be pushing a leftist agend in their classrooms, one of the professors responded this way:

The only problem he had with the UT Business School was that the only economic system taught there was capitalism.

 

Please note BIR, I wrote two paragraphs. A new paragraph generally denotes a change in subject or emphasis. I made two different points. </font>[/QUOTE]Well, that certainly is interesting.

The topic in this discussion is "communists leading our Universities." Now, if you are not equating the two, and did indeed "make two different points," then exactly why did you offer them together? In other words, what does the political affiliation of these professors have to do with "communists leading our Universities?"

When I asked you to amplify your comments, you wrote the following:

Now, since you amplifed that point with this quote:
1. Are you saying that the 11 out of the 12 are not only democrats, but part of the "radical left?"
2. If the answer to 1. is "yes," then what is your proof for such a contention?
3. If you see "little difference between activists democrats and the radical left," then are you implying that the two are synonymous? If you are not saying this, then why did you state that "11 of the 12 faculty members are democrats?"

Indeed.
Exactly what is the source of your hostility here, OldRegular?
I asked you about statements that YOU made, and I made a point to ask you to clarify the reason why you made these comments. After all, you stated that you could "make the point," didn't you?

And no, MP, I am not feeling the love.....

Now this is confusing. You made the comment that started this exchange. I asked you to amplify your statements, and you said that you saw "little difference between activists democrats and the radical left." C4K is asking a question, and you want him to prove the counterpoint to a point that you may or may not have made, depending upon whether or not the "two different points" you offered are mutually exclusive.
You could really clear this up by answering these questions......
Regards,
BiR

 

I think denial of anyone's rights, even the right to be wrong, is not democracy, and frankly I thought McCarthy died a long time ago.

You seem to be so afraid of the communist system of government it is frightening. You prolly think that the UK is harbouring on communism with a socialist government, and certainly Canada is in great danger with its socialist party enjoying its strength.

Thank God for socialism, which gives us social responsibility, including medicare and old age security, something many of us grew up without and sadly paid the price.

By the way, the 18 families from La, now temporarily residing in Ontario will enjoy full medical coverage and other benefits. Praise God!

Cheers,

Jim

 

Amen Bro. Jim1999!

This rugged individualism, jingoistic irrational fear of any type of socialized program is amazing. We have socialist highways, socialist fire and police, why not other social programs?

 

Socialism has been a great success in Cuba. Commandant Fidel Castro has been able to abolish the 1940 constitution that allowed for individualism and individual rights as well as take the 3rd best economy in Latin America and turn it into one of the worst.

Russia only murdered 100,000,000 people and almost made socialism work. Perhaps if another 50,000,000 had been murdered by the government, the socialistic system could have been made to work. Afterall, it is based upon survival of the fittest wherein all resources are placed in the hands of the government and whoever controls the government thereby controls the resources.

North Korea and Viet Nam are also examples of socialistic paradises that people are begging to get into.

Canada not only has socialism but has made the great step forward of legalizing same-sex marriages, the very definition of modernism.

 

In hindsight was Joe McCarthy actually wrong?

 

And Indiana was the largest home for the KKK. Let's not forget that too!

The UK slaughtered half its population to introduce socialism, as did Canada, Sweden and a host of other countries. It is easy to name the 3rd world countries that embraced communism.

A democratic country has the right to introduce legislation of its own making. By the way, it was in the USA that the first gay marriage was performed. Don't pick and choose your data.

Cheers,

Jim

Proud to be a lifelong socialist.

 

Expanding on my earlier remarks:

I see little difference between activists democrats and the radical left. Really all one has to do is read the history of the growth of Socialism in this country beginning with the democrat Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt administration. Now if anyone is too inept or lazy to study the history of such growth they should not expect others to do it for them. But then that is the mind of socialism; enjoy the fruits of others labor!

 

Old Regular, Are you saying that I am lazy? I dare you to follow in the footprints on my 78 year history. Some Americans are great at namecalling, but can be quite ignorant and lazy in their own right.

Cheers,

Jim

 

Well, I don't know where you get your statistic about the KKK but it really doesn't matter because they are no longer except in the imagination of the leftists.

Europeans have a slowed economy and Canada does, too. You really can't afford to help the survivors of the hurricane. You are deporting people to the USA who have no jobs. My neighbor is a Canadian who could not find work up there. My doctor was a Jew who left Canada because of their bad treatment of Jews. You are so European that you almost don't realize that you are in the New World. Too bad.

Your socialized medicine is parasitical because it destroys medical research by giving all of the money to the government employees. We have never recognized same-sex marriage down here--and I notice that you call it gay marriage and not same-sex marriage--but you have joined Spain, Belgium, and Holland in legalizing same-sex marriage.

Your defense of socialism says that countries such as North Korea, Russia, Cuba, and Viet Nam are not important. Actually, they are. Most of the suffering of people at the hands of their own governments in the 20th century happened in socialized countries. It is socialism that has the worst record of human rights abuse. Therefore it is not surprising that socialism attacks Christianity. The human rights abuse in the name of socialism is best shown by the examples of Cuba, Russia, North Korea, and Viet Nam.

 

Good Evening, CMG:

If you are suggesting that the KKK are "no longer" in the sense that they no longer exist, you might want to do a google search on Morris Dees or the Southern Poverty Law Center. Perhaps you could google David Duke. Morris would definitely disagree with you if that is what you are saying.

Regards to you, over there in Indy (like I said before, I do love your city),
BiR

 

If you are a pastor then you should read this http://bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=21464