You repeatedly reply, yet you offer nothing to elaborate on why you
specifically mentioned those people
AT South Carolina. Apparently, you see no problem with just inserting these people into a discussion about "communists leading our Universities." How is it that your conscience allows you to this without regard for the foolishness this demonstrates? Now you felt compelled to add some instant graemlins to the discussion. I guess we can add immaturity to the list.
So, let's recap: in the post where you attempted to make a "point," you introduced 11 individuals
AT South Carolina into this discussion about "communists leading our Universities." You offered no insight as to why you did this, and have seemingly refused to do so (
claiming it ain't proof [sic]). When I continued "taking you to task," you attempted to make this personal with your comments about Richmonders (unfortunately for you, it exposed a geographical challenge). Then, despite not lending any insight into why you wrote about the 11
AT South Carolina, you did write about Judge Roberts and Senator Biden. Now you offer this post that is reproduced at the top of this response.
So, as this discussion is about to draw to an end, I guess we will never know why you felt the need to tell us about these 11 people
AT South Carolina in this discussion about "communists leading our Universities." Perhaps you will give us the proof for bringing them into the discussion. Perhaps you will offer evidence as to why they were brought to our attention in this discussion. After all, this IS a discussion about "communists leading our Universities."
To quote Army attorney Joseph Welch — "
Have you no shame, sir?"
[ September 15, 2005, 08:22 PM: Message edited by: Baptist in Richmond ]