There have been a lot of posts in this thread that don't add to the discussion at all, even though the authors of the posts think that they do. When the question is asked, "Could life exist on Mars?", the answer "Who cares?" does not help. Further in, the answer "Only if God wanted it there" or "Only if God created it" doesn't help either. I don't think anyone is debating that it could have evolved there.
Which is why I wonder then why would having all necessary ingredients would make any difference whatsoever? Like I said, if all the ingredients for cement were there I wouldn't give that one iota of credible reasoning toward that I could expect to find concrete structures there.
Another answer that I am having a problem with is "It would be pointless for God to have put it there" or "It would be illogical. Pointless or illogical to us, maybe. But I personally do not presume to be able to read God's mind.
I've made claims and asked as to how the point of other life could add up truthfully given what we told of the beginning of creation and that logical reasoning and belief in truth (faith) go hand in hand, for without reasoning for truth there is not reason to believe, have faith. (It is my belief God is Truth so love of truth can be known by reasoning) Probably shouldn't have brought that up because it gets into a whole other involed subject relating to logic.
But I personally do not presume to be able to read God's mind.
But, of course you (should) know that is a strawman argument.
Originally Posted by Benjamin:
I don’t think other life is possible because I believe God is 100% Truth and has given us an account of the beginning of creation
What I am getting from this statement is that you say that if GOd had created it, he would have had to tell us about it, to tell 100% of the truth.
I suppose if you took that statement by its self you might be able to form that perception. But, I have been saying that God did tells how and why He created life and that what He has told us IS “truth” and must remain so, for God IS 100% Truth. As I have pointed to I see many problems with keeping His account of creation as being truth as other life does not relate to what we have been told is His purpose in creating it.
Well, God didn't tell us about a lot of things, He just lumped them in as a group. Bacterium, for instance.
Yet, God spoke of not touching dead things, washing hands and being clean. There are many hints in the Word that God not only knew how diseases began but that He told us ways to avoid them. I see no hints of the sort that other life could exist, do you? Again, I’m not saying it couldn’t, in fact, I’ve even said if it were to exist I expect that there would be ways to go back after such a discovery and explain it; I’m saying I don’t even see the possibility according to what we have been told in the Biblical account of creation for it to add up, as a matter of fact I have pointing to ways that couldn’t add up. (These claims have been avoided for arguments made from silence, nothing more.) This theory of other life existing elsewhere is what has simply been pulled out of the air; other than a belief in the "truth" of science, I have a problem with that, don't you?
They are just lumped in with the other animals. Just because God doesn't explicitly say that He created something, doesn't mean that He didn't.
On the same grounds nor does it prove they do exist.
And the point I’ve been making is that I see no way to “lump” in other forms of life on other planets and it adding up to what God has told us in His foundational plans and purposes of creation within the account of the “beginning” of creation He has given us (those made in His image and likeness). I’m not sure why so many are even so bent on trying to lump other life in to His creation, although I could speculate that the pastor I mentioned was on to something. :smilewinkgrin: Maybe, too much Star Trek fantasy to boot is a contributing factor? :tongue3:
After all, for Him to tell the "whole" truth, wouldn't He have had to explain things better?
No, that would be a false dilemma. God telling us truth does equate to telling us everything, it would be silly to even suggest we could understand everything, again, I made no such suggestion, but my point is that what He has told us IS “truth” and must remain so. I’ve asked several questions as to how the things He has told us could remain truth and related it to what we are told of the foundation and purposes of God, along with His character and yet add up to other life existing?
Light, for example. He just said that He created it. He didn't say how it worked, or what it was. He just said that He created it.
Taking that example, God explains to us the He made light and uses that to tell us in a complex way it brought forth life as part of His foundational plan. In His account of creation, in the beginning,... I've already made some unanswered claims to support my point reagrding that.
Now, I have already stated that I don't think sentient life will be found elsewhere. It's possible, but I think improbable due to God having to supply a seperate salvation plan, etc, for this other "race". However, I see no reason that other organisms (especially microscopic) couldn't have been created by God and placed on other planets, even other systems.
I’m glad you at least add that these possible existing organisms would have been created by God, at least shows some guts. :laugh: I think many in the world are out to enforce their argument that life didn’t have to come from God in such a discovery. Like I’ve said such a discovery would not shake my faith and conviction whatsoever and I’m sure it would not shake yours either, or shouldn’t. But, what I’ve continued to claim is that I don’t see any logical reason for it to exist elsewhere and have asked for one, I’ve also claimed that any other existing life would need to add up to the account of the beginning of creation (a “truth” God has given us) and have pointed out many difficulties in that other life could do so.
The fact of the matter is, that scripture is silent on the matter. And we don't have enough scientific evidence one way or the other to know. So, it's definitely not out of the question.
No, the fact of the matter is that God told us His purposes in creation (in truth) and we don’t in any way need scientific evidence to confirm or not what He has told us.
You’ve sorta just made my point that many seem to be in fear that science may disprove the Biblical account as we have been told and believe about creation based on what science might discover. I’ve also addressed that in this thread.
BTW, "Curiosity" is not the first rover we've had on Mars. It's the third. And we haven't found any evidence of life yet. But that's just one planet, in one system, in one galaxy, in the whole universe.
Well, I imagine this intriguing quest will never end and never be answered this side of heaven but it doesn’t change my view that it doesn’t add up to the Biblical account of creation, nor does vast infinite space change my opinion and won’t until these guys show up to my face and say otherwise: