Most people can not reconcile Pauls letters with the gospels or with James.
This is simply not true.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Most people can not reconcile Pauls letters with the gospels or with James.
This is simply not true.
It is if you think dispensationalism is doctrinal error.
A rather odd statement. This has nothing to do with dispensationalism. Night and day.
I think Paul was a little screwed up but one thing we can know for sure: Paul wasn't in it for the money.
What neither TS or BH understand is the simple gospel of Jesus Christ. They imagine that right terms (grace, believe, justification, eternal life; etc.) means right UNDERSTANDING of those terms. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The gospel of Jesus Christ includes not merely recognition of the right gospel terms but the right understanding of those gospel terms.
"Another gospel" does not repudiate the gospel terms but rather repudiates the proper understanding of those terms and redefines them to mean something completely contrary to the Gos and/or adds or subtracts to the gospel of Christ - Gal. 1:8-9; 1 Cor. 15:9-20; etc.
Bill you are the only one "screwed up" when it comes to Paul or your views. If Paul did not write by inspiration then he flat lied. If his salvation testimony was not true then he flat lied. There is no indication in history that any of the congregations he planted were rejected by the 12 apostles or that they rejected Paul's writings as inspired scripture. Peter certainly claimed they were "as other scriptures" - 2 Pet. 3:15-17.
Pauls books seem at odds with the gospels
Bob Hope...
Your kidding, right? You HAVE to be kidding.
The Pauline epistles can not be over emphasised.
The Pauline epistles, in regard to the gosple, are the Mount Rushmore of the scriptures.
Why would you say that?
The Pauline epistles contain much of the doctrine the Christian faith is built upon, especially in relationship to salvation. The Pauline epistles expound on the doctrines of sanctification, justification, redemption, and reconciliation. The Pauline epistles contain significant teachings on difficult theological issues such as: election, predestination, foreknowledge, the deity/humanity of Christ, God’s ongoing relationship with Israel, and the Judgment Seat of Christ. The Pauline epistles also get very practical in how the church should function, containing teaching on: spiritual gifts, qualifications of church leaders, the role of women in ministry, and the relationship between law and grace in the life of a Christ-follower.
The Pauline epistles are not to be confused with "Pauline Christianity," which is the unbiblical view that Paul’s teachings in the epistles are unique in Scripture and distinct from the gospel of Jesus. The “Pauline Christians” believe that what Paul taught differs from what is taught in the Gospels. This belief goes against some of the most fundamental beliefs of orthodox Christians, including the inerrancy of Scripture, the unity of the Bible and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. We know that “all Scripture is God-breathed,” inspired by the same Spirit. Therefore, it is a unified whole, preserved forever by God. The Pauline epistles are part of that unity and the teachings they contain are equally inspired and in complete harmony with the rest of the Bible
Because Paul, more than anyone else, is the singuler vessel, whom God chose to revel the monumental, and foundational truthes of the New Covenant.
This will be much better than my explanation....
.