• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Covid Plandemic, New World order takeover

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
A link followed from the OP,
List of 32 'Elites' That Support and Promote Depopulation - Humans Are Free
Some things some people said about culling the numbers of people on earth.

The implantable forced sterilization device comment

Why Was an Advocate of Forced Abortion Invited to the Vatican? (hli.org)

22. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Merck’s deadly Vioxx playbook, redux: a debunked smear campaign against its competing drug—the FDA-approved, Nobel prize-honored ivermectin (trialsitenews.com

Since Ivermectin is now off patent, Merck does not want it used for covid, makes them no money.

On the science behind ivermectin and COVID-19, including clinical, animal, and molecular studies, see this recently published review.18 Its lead author is a prominent clinical researcher at Yale. Two coauthors are in the line of the only two Nobel prize-honored treatment breakthroughs for infectious diseases since the one for streptomycin in 1952. Notably, coauthor Thomas Borody in 1990 published the first clinical trial for the cure for H. pylori (peptic ulcers).31 That cure consisted of three repurposed inexpensive drugs: two antibiotics and bismuth.18 It was adopted immediately in Australia, in 1990, saving an estimated 18,000 lives.32 A decade later, after the patents for the billion dollar palliative drugs, Tagamet and Zantac, expired, that cure became the standard of care for peptic ulcers in the rest of the world.18

Ivermectin safety. Ivermectin is well tolerated even at ten times the standard dose of 200 μg/kg,33,34 and at high doses, in particular, for COVID-19 treatment.35,36 Cancer patients who took ivermectin at five times that standard dose daily for up to 180 consecutive days had no serious adverse effects from it, in experimental protocols with harsh additional drugs.

37. Of 19 patients who took extreme overdoses up to 1,000-fold that standard dose of either ivermectin or the closely related abamectin, all using veterinary forms, only one 72-year-old male who took 440 times the standard dose died.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Merck’s deadly Vioxx playbook, redux: a debunked smear campaign against its competing drug—the FDA-approved, Nobel prize-honored ivermectin (trialsitenews.com

Since Ivermectin is now off patent, Merck does not want it used for covid, makes them no money.

On the science behind ivermectin and COVID-19, including clinical, animal, and molecular studies, see this recently published review.18 Its lead author is a prominent clinical researcher at Yale. Two coauthors are in the line of the only two Nobel prize-honored treatment breakthroughs for infectious diseases since the one for streptomycin in 1952. Notably, coauthor Thomas Borody in 1990 published the first clinical trial for the cure for H. pylori (peptic ulcers).31 That cure consisted of three repurposed inexpensive drugs: two antibiotics and bismuth.18 It was adopted immediately in Australia, in 1990, saving an estimated 18,000 lives.32 A decade later, after the patents for the billion dollar palliative drugs, Tagamet and Zantac, expired, that cure became the standard of care for peptic ulcers in the rest of the world.18

Ivermectin safety. Ivermectin is well tolerated even at ten times the standard dose of 200 μg/kg,33,34 and at high doses, in particular, for COVID-19 treatment.35,36 Cancer patients who took ivermectin at five times that standard dose daily for up to 180 consecutive days had no serious adverse effects from it, in experimental protocols with harsh additional drugs.

37. Of 19 patients who took extreme overdoses up to 1,000-fold that standard dose of either ivermectin or the closely related abamectin, all using veterinary forms, only one 72-year-old male who took 440 times the standard dose died.
I think it is important to remember that with all medications (including vaccines) there are risks. For seriously ill covid patients some have recommended 50x the approved dose (600 mg for 5 consecutive days instead of 150 to 200 mg once every 3 to 6 months). Side effects have been blindness and death - but that does not mean this is expected at such levels (only that they can occur). Given the seriousness of covid when a person becomes critically ill with the virus I don't see that the risks associated with ivermectin are greater than other treatments.
 

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is, of course, not a valid line of reasoning. Unless you have an actual case, as contrasted with mere speculation, as to why we would have expected the pandemic to have "fizzled out", this is a nothing-burger.

I could equally well have said the following decades ago:

Did it ever occur to you that without the vax, polio would have indeed fizzled out?

or

Did it ever occur to you that without the vax, smallpox would have indeed fizzled out?
Redundant argument. Already addressed in another thread with you. This is how well leftists pay attention. They just put their talking points on auto rewind & disregard the rest. You will see lefties here arguing ‘conspiracy theory/conspiracy website’. That means they have absolved themselves of reading or addressing a point, because they would rather just chime in with disparaging remarks. They aren’t willing to learn. They don’t need to, the leftist establishment tells them what to think & that’s good enough for them. Useful idiots. That is what the left truly thinks about their own base.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
One thing I have noticed is that the Pro-vax element insists that the majority of doctors are on there side, but they overlook the basic fact that the nay-sayers have been largely stifled - certainly in the sources that they go to. Their seems to be a deep-seated unwillingness to even consider that our government and entities under their power are trying their utmost to muzzle free speech.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Redundant argument. Already addressed in another thread with you. This is how well leftists pay attention. They just put their talking points on auto rewind & disregard the rest. You will see lefties here arguing ‘conspiracy theory/conspiracy website’. That means they have absolved themselves of reading or addressing a point, because they would rather just chime in with disparaging remarks. They aren’t willing to learn. They don’t need to, the leftist establishment tells them what to think & that’s good enough for them. Useful idiots. That is what the left truly thinks about their own base.

Whenever I read "conspiracy theorist" I quit reading. It almost always means that what is written is a knee-jerk reaction, not the words of balanced and informed investigation.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Ok....working through this..

So the covid virus was part of a new world order takeover.

The virus and vaccine was ready in 2015.

This was discussed as early as 2008 (it was a long time in development).

The plan is to kill off at least 4 billion people (a little over half the world population).

The goal is to reduce the human population so that it is in balance with nature.



There is a documentary of sorts about this. It is series called 12 Monkies. It adds time travel (it is based on an earlier movie with Bruce Willis). I liked the series better.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
One thing I have noticed is that the Pro-vax element insists that the majority of doctors are on there side, but they overlook the basic fact that the nay-sayers have been largely stifled - certainly in the sources that they go to. Their seems to be a deep-seated unwillingness to even consider that our government and entities under their power are trying their utmost to muzzle free speech.

This is a first: Two typos that I can no longer fix. My "their" should be "there" and my "there" should be "their"!
 

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is a first: Two typos that I can no longer fix. My "their" should be "there" and my "there" should be "their"!
There’s a pretty short window of time when you can edit your post. Of course, not so if you are a moderator, then things can & do change anytime. I have even thought that taking screenshots would be valuable at times.
 

Andre

Well-Known Member
I trust America's Frontline doctors over Fauci anyday.
Another hanging curveball.

Dr. Merritt may be a fine orthopedic surgeon, but when it comes to the science of COVID-19, she is a bumbling neophyte.

Suspicion is immediately aroused when Merritt is identified as a member of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” a handful of conspiracy-minded physicians that include luminaries such as Dr. Stella Immanuel who alleges that alien DNA is being used in medical treatments and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. She also believes in a conspiracy by the “Illuminati” to destroy the world with abortion, gay marriage, and of all things, children’s toys. As far as gynecological diseases go, they can be caused by having sex with witches and demons that appear in dreams.

Come on, man - make it at least remotely believable.
 

Andre

Well-Known Member
Only 301 doctors were surveyed. Common sense tells me that at least 40% of doctors (and nurses, for that matter) are unvaccinated and will remain so,
First of all, if the doctors surveyed were chosen randomly, 301 might be an adequate sample size. In fact, according to my calculations, for a population of about 1,000,000 doctors in the USA, a sample of only 400 is needed get a valid finding with a 95% confidence level.

As for 40% of doctors and nurses, that is a tad misleading - it is the doctors who are much more qualified to offer an opinion.

In any event "common sense" is not a reliable guide.
 

RipponRedeaux

Well-Known Member
As for 40% of doctors and nurses, that is a tad misleading - it is the doctors who are much more qualified to offer an opinion.
Doctors are much more qualified to offer an opinion you say? That's funny. The doctors were surveyed to see how many were vaccinated. Does it take expertise for anyone to relate that they were vaccinated? LOL!! :)
 

Andre

Well-Known Member
Doctors are much more qualified to offer an opinion you say? That's funny. The doctors were surveyed to see how many were vaccinated. Does it take expertise for anyone to relate that they were vaccinated? LOL!! :)
The laugh is on you, of course.

The fact that the surveyed 301 doctors have been vaccinated obviously attests to their confidence that getting vaccinated is the right course of action.
 
Top