Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Disagree.A poster wrote:
"A God who refuses to make salvation available to all is the cruel and unjust God."
Do you agree or disagree with that assertion?
Nope. God chose to use believers as ambassadors, and they have not made the gospel of Christ presentation to everyone who has ever lived. Further, some who were exposed to the gospel were, due to the hardness of their heart, unable to understand it, i.e. the first soil of Matthew 13.A poster wrote:
"A God who refuses to make salvation available to all is the cruel and unjust God."
Do you agree or disagree with that assertion?
No.A poster wrote:
"A God who refuses to make salvation available to all is the cruel and unjust God."
Do you agree or disagree with that assertion?
Do you believe humans are born perfect, like Jesus, but then sin later due to society teaching them to sin?No.
That is, unless they are born condemned for the sins of their forefathers before they ever drew breath.
If, however, they are only condemned for their own rebellion God is under no obligation to save anyone.
I believe they become sinners when they sin.Do you believe humans are born perfect, like Jesus, but then sin later due to society teaching them to sin?
Pelagianism is a heterodox Christian theological position which holds that the original sin did not taint human nature and that humans have the free will to achieve human perfection without divine grace. Pelagius (c. 355 – c. 420 AD), a British ascetic and philosopher, taught that God could not command believers to do the impossible, and therefore it must be possible to satisfy all divine commandments. He also taught that it was unjust to punish one person for the sins of another; therefore, infants are born blameless. Pelagius accepted no excuse for sinful behavior and taught that all Christians, regardless of their station in life, should live unimpeachable, sinless lives.I believe they become sinners when they sin.
I don't believe they are born condemned by the sins of Adam.
I believe Jesus was a human born like all other humans in respect to this question. I believe Jesus was not a sinner because Jesus never sinned.
If God was really that, would have provided and made salvation for NONE!A poster wrote:
"A God who refuses to make salvation available to all is the cruel and unjust God."
Do you agree or disagree with that assertion?
I know what Wikipedia says about "Pelagianism"....Pelagianism is a heterodox Christian theological position which holds that the original sin did not taint human nature and that humans have the free will to achieve human perfection without divine grace. Pelagius (c. 355 – c. 420 AD), a British ascetic and philosopher, taught that God could not command believers to do the impossible, and therefore it must be possible to satisfy all divine commandments. He also taught that it was unjust to punish one person for the sins of another; therefore, infants are born blameless. Pelagius accepted no excuse for sinful behavior and taught that all Christians, regardless of their station in life, should live unimpeachable, sinless lives.
Pelagianism - Wikipedia.
How did he view the effects of the Fall ?I know what Wikipedia says about "Pelagianism"....
I've known it for years.
I also don't care what Wikipedia says about "Pelagianism".
Pelagius wasn't a "Pelagian".
I've actually read Original works by Pelagius; Have you?
I didn't think so.
In fact, I know you haven't.
Would be Unjust to have Universalism , as how would there by justice and judgement upon sinners?I disagree with the statement. God would not be cruel or unjust had He refused to make salvation avaliable to all. God also would not be unjust to make salvation to all.
Maybe.Would be Unjust to have Universalism , as how would there by justice and judgement upon sinners?
Man died.How did he view the effects of the Fall ?
Do you believe you were saved because of "justness"?Would be Unjust to have Universalism , as how would there by justice and judgement upon sinners?
You have read his extant Latin writings?I know what Wikipedia says about "Pelagianism"....
I've known it for years.
I also don't care what Wikipedia says about "Pelagianism".
Pelagius wasn't even a "Pelagian". That term is tatamount to meaningless. Although it is obviously true that it is unjust to punish one person for the sins of another. God also clearly teaches that in his Holy Word, so I am in good company in that belief.
I've actually read Original works by Pelagius; Have you?
I didn't think so.
In fact, I know you haven't. Neither did R.C. Sproul, Philip Schaff, Lorrainne Boettner or any Calvinist legend you may worship.
None of them.......
None, ever read anything from Pelagius' own pen. I can know that, because his writings (other than the letter to Demetrias) weren't available when they coined the nonsensical cockamamie term "Pelagianism" I couldn't care less what they say. I certainly then, don't care what some fourth-hand flunky disciple of theirs posts on Wikipedia.
I simply believe the rather obvious point that it would be unjust for anyone to punish someone for the sins of another.
That includes God himself. Otherwise the term "just" means nothing.
God doesn't punish a son for the sins of the father either.
God is under no constraint to save anyone, but, he would be unjust to punish anyone for the sins of another.
You don't have to be a "Pelagian" to see that:
You merely have to be sane.
A poster wrote:
"A God who refuses to make salvation available to all is the cruel and unjust God."
further, some who were exposed to the gospel were, due to the hardness of their heart, unable to understand it, i.e. the first soil of Matthew 13.
You have read his extant Latin writings?
Since Pelagius is declared a heretic and his writings have been condemned by the Roman church, Coptic church, Eastern church and Protestant church, I find it interesting that you promote his beliefs as though the Bible actually supports his beliefs.
You make the cross of Christ unnecessary, thus I have nothing more to say to you regarding this subject. You have condemned yourself and thus there is no need for me to go any further. Good day.
It's their only argument."Ever and anon the non-Cal cries, why doth He still find fault?" Quote @Aaron