Cruz: I call upon every believer, every constitutionalist, every lover of liberty to

[Earth Wind and Fire]

Herein is the primary fallacy, that homo and heterosexuality are identities. They are not. They are behaviors. The terms are Freudian inventions. The term heterosexual was first applied to those that had an unnatural sexual appetite for those of the opposite sex, and the term homosexual was applied to those who had an unnatural sexual appetite for those of the same sex.

Both homosexuals and heterosexuals were deviants.

There really are no such things as heterosexuals or homosexuals. There are those who revel in sodomy.

FREUDIAN INVENTIONS ........
Really, Ive honestly never heard of that one. Can you reference anything to support that supposition?

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

My country tis of thee, sweet land of liberty.....do you recall that song. My generation sang it daily in school. I haven't thought about it in years to be honest. Not when our liberties are being ripped from us and our sense of Christian values and morality are being reduced and mocked. The deffinition of marriage is...well you know what it is to a practicing Christian. Thus I stand with Ms. DAVIS in her refusal to be a party to moral and spiritual decay. Good for you sister and you go girl:thumbs:

 

[Rippon]

My country tis of thee, sweet land of liberty.....do you recall that song. My generation sang it daily in school. I haven't thought about it in years to be honest. Not when our liberties are being ripped from us and our sense of Christian values and morality are being reduced and mocked. The deffinition of marriage is...well you know what it is to a practicing Christian. Thus I stand with Ms. DAVIS in her refusal to be a party to moral and spiritual decay. Good for you sister and you go girl:thumbs:

We are strangers and pilgrims here on the earth. Heaven is our real home.

But speaking in a secular sense I wish we could start America over again somewhere else. But where?

 

[righteousdude2]

In other words, rather than being a man and answering a difficult question, you just changed the question to something you found more palatable and answered your own question.

The man is "gifted" at doing exactly what you accused him of. If he isn't working for obamanation, he should be :laugh:

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

We are strangers and pilgrims here on the earth. Heaven is our real home.

But speaking in a secular sense I wish we could start America over again somewhere else. But where?

In your hometown....if its like mine, then its primitive. Grow where you are planted......never mind that the soil is rocky and claylike. Cultivate, cultivate, cultivate.

But let me ask you a question, what is and where is the kingdom of God?

 

[Aaron]

FREUDIAN INVENTIONS ........
Really, Ive honestly never heard of that one. Can you reference anything to support that supposition?

Google "Against Heterosexuality" and a "First Things" article should pop up. Read it. I posted it sometime ago here but was accused of discussing human sexuality and it got closed or zapped or both.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

Google "Against Heterosexuality" and a "First Things" article should pop up. Read it. I posted it sometime ago here but was accused of discussing human sexuality and it got closed or zapped or both.

Yea I will...funny though, I have a degree in it but never heard of it....so it will be interesting to read.:thumbsup:

 

[Lewis]

That's not comparable. So why don't you try asking a question that is comparable to the situation at hand instead of trying to manipulate the conversation so that you can make a point?

Here is a question that is comparable.

The law of the land in the 1850's required that runaway slaves be returned to their owners. Even if they were residing in non-slave states.

Is it your honest belief that, when confronted with a situation where an official was aware that an escaped slave was within his jurisdiction, that he must either return the slave to the owner or resign? Any official or officer of the law?

 

[just-want-peace]

Here is a question that is comparable.

The law of the land in the 1850's required that runaway slaves be returned to their owners. Even if they were residing in non-slave states.

Is it your honest belief that, when confronted with a situation where an official was aware that an escaped slave was within his jurisdiction, that he must either return the slave to the owner or resign? Any official or officer of the law?

Thinking hard, thinking hard; will not answer until I can reword and/or come up with a D approved answer!

Till then-------!:sleep:

 

[Lewis]

Thinking hard, thinking hard; will not answer until I can reword and/or come up with a D approved answer!

Till then-------!:sleep:

That is for sure.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

I agree. The conditions under which free state government officials and residents lived in the days of the Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott Decision are the closest to what we are facing with same sex marriages.

History may not repeat itself, but it can and does rhyme.

Here is a question that is comparable.

The law of the land in the 1850's required that runaway slaves be returned to their owners. Even if they were residing in non-slave states.

Is it your honest belief that, when confronted with a situation where an official was aware that an escaped slave was within his jurisdiction, that he must either return the slave to the owner or resign? Any official or officer of the law?

 

[Lewis]

I agree. The conditions under which free state government officials and residents lived in the days of the Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott Decision are the closest to what we are facing with same sex marriages.

History may not repeat itself, but it can and does rhyme.

Yes, and I think that many today would applaud officials of those times who ignored the Fugitive Slave Act, and also refused to resign their positions. In that respect it is the same.
Kim Davis is just on the wrong side of political correctness.