Dead Man's Choice?

[Silverhair]

I don't think that it would go over well with the moderators on this board if in thread #41 I had posted the entire Bible from Genesis 1:1 through Revelation 22:21. That would have been a really, really, really, really, really, really long post.

That is a rather silly response. But I have come to expect such from most calvinists.

 

[KenH]

That is a rather silly response.

So to make the point I made in post #41, instead of quoting the Holy Scriptures, what method would you have me to do?

 

[Revmitchell]

intentional?!? Ken posted this article… why May I ask? Should he continue in his common intentional misrepresentation posts?

If Ken agrees with that misrepresentation he should prove that is what others claim and believe. Until he or any other calve can do that they are intentionally misrepresenting other with whom they disagree. It is evil. It is bearing false witness. Who believes that they are any portion responsible for their salvation? Who? Who on this board believes that? No one.

It is a false characterization. Calvies have a habit of telling other what they believe and when they debate that calves say "but that is what it means when you say that" then have the nerve to say that everyone else gets them wrong. Well it's time for more honesty in debates. No one believes they contribute to their salvation contrary to what the op says.

I can't believe someone has the nerve to defend such junk.

 

[kyredneck]

Read post # 41 What did you do there but post cherry picked verses out of context to support your view.

ROFguffawing

 

[KenH]

calves

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

If Ken agrees with that misrepresentation he should prove that is what others claim and believe. Until he or any other calve can do that they are intentionally misrepresenting other with whom they disagree. It is evil. It is bearing false witness. Who believes that they are any portion responsible for their salvation? Who? Who on this board believes that? No one.

It is a false characterization. Calvies have a habit of telling other what they believe and when they debate that calves say "but that is what it means when you say that" then have the nerve to say that everyone else gets them wrong. Well it's time for more honesty in debates. No one believes they contribute to their salvation contrary to what the op says.

I can't believe someone has the nerve to defend such junk.

Are you suggesting that I’m defending it. Regarding content, I emphatically am not. I can show you evidence that the original Baptists did not support it. However if Ken wants to disclose his beliefs, let him. There is no harm in frank discussion on the subject. When was the last time anyone had a dialog on Hyper Calvinism?

 

[Silverhair]

So to make the point I made in post #41, instead of quoting the Holy Scriptures, what method would you have me to do?

Quoting scripture is not the problem. Taking them out of context is. The use of Proverbs or Psalms to build your doctrine on is not what one would call a sound approach.

So you cherry pick verses that you think support your view. But you should expect people to question what you say.

 

[KenH]

. The use of Proverbs or Psalms

Proverbs and Psalms are as much a part of God's Word, the Bible, as all of the other books of the Bible.

 

[Revmitchell]

Are you suggesting that I’m defending it. Regarding content, I emphatically am not. I can show you evidence that the original Baptists did not support it. However if Ken wants to disclose his beliefs, let him. There is no harm in frank discussion on the subject. When was the last time anyone had a dialog on Hyper Calvinism?

And I am being pretty frank

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

And I am being pretty frank

I’m aware of that.