The Calvinist position does not limit God as does the Arminian position. Primitive Baptists are not opposed to the spreading of the Gospel so long as it is done by Biblical means. By Biblical means I mean the evangelist is called and directed by the Spirit of the Lord. However, Primitive Baptists do not believe God is helpless to save souls without the efforts of His sinful creatures. Arminians, on the other hand, teach there is no salvation where there is no Gospel preacher. That, my friend, is limiting God! If God loves all His creatures equally and died for each one equally, it appears God would also give all an equal opportunity to hear the Gospel. Experience does not support that claim because multitudes die every day without hearing of the precious Son of God. The hands of the Almighty are tied because He can do nothing unless we do. Does that sound like the God of the Scriptures who declared, "My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure" (Isaiah 46:10)? Certainly not. God said, "And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh" (Ezekiel 11:19). I do not see the works of man anywhere in that declaration. I read the words of God that He would give one heart, and He would give a new spirit, and He would take out the "stony heart," and He would give "an heart of flesh." No where in that passage do I see anything that even gives the slightest hint that man would play any role whatever in this process. The Baptists of old stood for regeneration without means, and there is no need to depart from what the Baptist forefathers taught despite the missionary priestcraft of the religious world because it is the truth! The parable of Matthew 13:3-9 clearly teaches the soil (i.e., heart) must be already prepared before the Gospel is received and brings forth fruit.
[ August 12, 2002, 09:17 PM: Message edited by: Primitive Baptist ]