OK so we can pay cops, Lawyers, Judges, Prisons. Bail Bondsman, pay for vehicles yadayadaAny laws about anything was the question?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
OK so we can pay cops, Lawyers, Judges, Prisons. Bail Bondsman, pay for vehicles yadayadaAny laws about anything was the question?
You know California, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, and a few others will. The key is not approaching abortion as a challenge to Roe V. Wade, but attacking it from the point of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme court could instantly make abortion illegal in all 50 states if they ruled that the 14th applied to the unborn baby.
Huh, they do now.Hopefully states will not legalize that kind of murder.
Interesting observation. So that would focus on providing "the equal protection of the laws" part of that amendment to the unborn?The key is not approaching abortion as a challenge to Roe V. Wade, but attacking it from the point of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme court could instantly make abortion illegal in all 50 states if they ruled that the 14th applied to the unborn baby.
I doubt that they were "rampant", as that smacks of liberal and fake media propaganda! We did not have the culture of death as we have today, so would have been seen as needing to carry the baby by majority, not kill it!We had that.....illegial abortions & deaths were rampent.
They would the right to pursuit of ahppiness and of having God given rights that the state itself could not restrict or abridge, correct?Interesting observation. So that would focus on providing "the equal protection of the laws" part of that amendment to the unborn?
Have you gone off the deep end?OK so we can pay cops, Lawyers, Judges, Prisons. Bail Bondsman, pay for vehicles yadayada
Yes.Interesting observation. So that would focus on providing "the equal protection of the laws" part of that amendment to the unborn?
Yes.They would the right to pursuit of ahppiness and of having God given rights that the state itself could not restrict or abridge, correct?
This is why SO important to have judges trictly go by what was written and not make the law as they go, as the Founders did not see babies as anyhting other than fully human, and entitled to all of their God given rights...Yes.
So? If you kill a baby, it should put you in grave danger to do so.We had that.....illegial abortions & deaths were rampent.
I think it is only the Declaration of Independence that mentions the pursuit of happiness. The words in the 14th amendment are "...nor shall any state...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." So if the unborn is recognized as a person, under the U.S. Constitution no state could deny that person equal protection of its laws. Upshot of that is abortion would be unconstitutional/illegal in all 50 states and U.S. territories, if I understand the argument correctly.They would the right to pursuit of ahppiness and of having God given rights that the state itself could not restrict or abridge, correct?
Judges that respect the intent of the Constitution. Sometimes the exact wording is ambiguous, but the records of the debate on the issue at time of ratification make the intent clear.This is why SO important to have judges trictly go by what was written and not make the law as they go, as the Founders did not see babies as anyhting other than fully human, and entitled to all of their God given rights...
That was then this is now.Well Donald Trump asked Marla Maples to get an abortion, right. If you were to find out that Trump had sent some of his other mistresses to get abortions, would it then change your mind about him?
Right-wing ideologues like you think anything just slightly to the left of Attila the Hun is "communist/socialist in nature".
Is not the infant in the womb alive then? I find it MUCH easier to find support that the Infant is a person under that clause than a woman has an abortion right to privacy!I think it is only the Declaration of Independence that mentions the pursuit of happiness. The words in the 14th amendment are "...nor shall any state...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." So if the unborn is recognized as a person, under the U.S. Constitution no state could deny that person equal protection of its laws. Upshot of that is abortion would be unconstitutional/illegal in all 50 states and U.S. territories, if I understand the argument correctly.
I doubt that they were "rampant", as that smacks of liberal and fake media propaganda! We did not have the culture of death as we have today, so would have been seen as needing to carry the baby by majority, not kill it!
“Deaths from illegal abortions in this country ran between 200,000 and 1.2 million … so, a lot of women died in that period,” Feinstein claimed. “I don’t want to go back to those death tolls in this country.”
LifeNews quickly fact-checked Feinstein’s comments. But surprisingly at least two mainstream media outlets also called out her error.
The Associated Press reports Feinstein “vastly overstated” the number of women who died in illegal abortions prior to Roe v. Wade, while USA Today described her comment as “dramatically exaggerated.
I VERY much dount that they were more deaths when abortion was illegal than the 3000 babies murdered every day when it is legal!Oh, it's an old old lie by the pro-abortion lobby and DiFi just told it again yesterday:
Even the Liberal Media Calls Out Diane Feinstein for Lying About Women Dying in Illegal Abortions | LifeNews.com
awful argument anyways. People die from legal abortion, armed robbery and murder but that doesn't make those acts legal except one.
Horse ManureThat was then this is now.
Trump stated that he never felt the need to ask for God’s forgiveness, and yet repentance for one’s sins is a precondition to the Christian faith. So what can we Christians conclude?