Did Paul teach the Pre-Trib view?

[Calypsis4]

DHK
No, not at all.


That presupposes that you are the one with the truth which makes your statement all the more arrogant.

Still the same ugly accusation.
You lump is in with "millerites" (the SDA), and all the others whom we steadfastly have told you that we have not obtained our doctrine from. Therefore you are perpetuating lies and false accusations. Why?

There is nothing general about that specific accusation that was made.

nope.

Mr.Moderator, I am still pretty new here and I don't know just how far a person can go before being eliminated from the board for attitude or violating the rules, but these individuals you are debating with have insulted you repeatedly for many days. I am just curious; how far is too far? It's not just that they are in theological error but the attitude they have is atrocious.

I might add that I agree with you on this issue very strongly and you have done well in pointing out the errors.

God bless.:flower:

 

[Iconoclast]

Take a poll on it DHK....you will see how many will respond that what I have said is accurate.....

You do not like it because it is me who is the messenger....so ask the others if this is so....

better still read your own posts just in the last few weeks and hold your posts up to the same standard of judgment that you apply here.

 

[Iconoclast]

Mr.Moderator, I am still pretty new here and I don't know just how far a person can go before being eliminated from the board for attitude or violating the rules, but these individuals you are debating with have insulted you repeatedly for many days. I am just curious; how far is too far? It's not just that they are in theological error but the attitude they have is atrocious.

I might add that I agree with you on this issue very strongly and you have done well in pointing out the errors.

God bless.:flower:

You have accused board members of being heretics twice that I know of and are posting perverted things about human/ angel sex on the other denomination forum...you have already gone too far.

 

[Rippon]

There is nothing neutral about that statement no matter who are you are speaking TO. Either way it includes us.

What have you done? You have told us that we need to step away from these terrible books and look at our Bibles instead.

You are quite the hypocrite DHK. For scores of times you have told me personally and Calvinists in general to believe the Bible and not John Calvin. You have said that you believe the Bible instead of The Institutes of John Calvin.

You have brought up the man of Geneva scads of times out of the blue on threads that his name was mentioned by no one.

You have the audacity to level at others the very thing you have regularly practiced on the BB for more than a dozen years.

You have charged Calvinists with belief in false doctrine --even damnable heresy. And then you make claims that in conterdistinction you follow the Bible. You stink with your hypocrisy.

 

[Iconoclast]

You are quite the hypocrite DHK. For scores of times you have told me personally and Calvinists in general to believe the Bible and not John Calvin. You have said that you believe the Bible instead of The Institutes of John Calvin.

You have brought up the man of Geneva scads of times out of the blue on threads that his name was mentioned by no one.

You have the audacity to level at others the very thing you have regularly practiced on the BB for more than a dozen years.

You have charged Calvinists with belief in false doctrine --even damnable heresy. And then you make claims that in conterdistinction you follow the Bible. You stink with your hypocrisy.

:thumbs::wavey::thumbsup::thumbs:

 

[DHK]

You are quite the hypocrite DHK. For scores of times you have told me personally and Calvinists in general to believe the Bible and not John Calvin. You have said that you believe the Bible instead of The Institutes of John Calvin.

Why must I feel compelled to respond to you also, and more importantly why must you be compelled to enter into something that is totally off topic, now on a thread that has been completely derailed and thus will shortly be shut down.

I always compare any teaching to the Bible. Whether it be Calvinism or any other doctrine I compare it to the Bible.
The difference here is that I can't compare what I have never read to the Bible. I have my beliefs concerning dispensationalism from the Bible not from Darby whom I have never read, or any other of their sources. Thus I and the others who have basically said the same thing, are falsely accused. That is unlike you who constantly quote Calvin, Spurgeon, the Puritans, other Calvinists and even the ECF. There is a world of difference.

You have brought up the man of Geneva scads of times out of the blue on threads that his name was mentioned by no one.

Yes, and we can compare what he believes and what he says to the Bible, especially since you claim to believe in his writings.

You have the audacity to level at others the very thing you have regularly practiced on the BB for more than a dozen years.

A false accusation.

You have charged Calvinists with belief in false doctrine --even damnable heresy. And then you make claims that in conterdistinction you follow the Bible. You stink with your hypocrisy.

I believe Calvinism to be in error. However I can compare the writings of Calvin--writings which you quote and you believe--to the Bible.
I don't affirm the writings of Darby, and yet am accused of believing them.
That is the difference. I hope you understand that.