• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do ALL Calvinist Say that faith Itself Comes From God, is A Gift Directly?

Status
Not open for further replies.

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
We can and do "see" the effects of God, but we don't or can't know that those effects are produced ex nihilo from the God of the Bible, who has revealed Himself to us. Without His special revelation, we would be as blind as naturalistic evolutionists. There is nothing in creation that spells out our need for salvation and/or God's provision thereof.

I agree fully with you on that, point trying to be made is that all men are without excuse before God, regardless if they are "elect" or not, as general revelation shows them God exists, but they will choose to reject/ignore Him, making up their own religion and god...
 

glfredrick

New Member
I agree fully with you on that, point trying to be made is that all men are without excuse before God, regardless if they are "elect" or not, as general revelation shows them God exists, but they will choose to reject/ignore Him, making up their own religion and god...

Certainly!

That is, in essence, how total depravity works out.
 

glfredrick

New Member
The point is however, that if natural man can clearly see and understand the divine nature and eternal qualities of God through this "general" or natural revelation, what would prevent him from clearly seeing and understanding the even clearer more detailed revelation of the gospel?

Also, the reason men are without excuse is because they rejected what was clearly known and understood. If you insist that most of humanity cannot know or understand the gospel due to Total Depravity then you undercut the clear intent of the text by suggesting that men can't ever clearly see or understand God's revelations, general or special. You give men the perfect excuse.

How are they going to see it unless it is revealed? And who can reveal it, save God?

They can know "of" salvation, but knowing of (head knowledge -- which seems to be your requirement) and becoming born again from above are two different things. Or, do you disagree? To paraphrase Nicodemus, "How can we be born again?" Of course, Jesus took him to task for asking such a silly question. God can do anything God wants to do, when He wants to do it, and to whom He wants it done to. And more, we won't kick and scream. We will bow down and worship Him for allowing us the chance!

A thought... How do you deal with Romans 14:11. Surely God will be dragging every single sinful human being into His divine presence, and He WILL exert His divine sovereignty, whether or not they like it. Or, perhaps you side with Rob Bell here, and see human freedom existing to the levels where we can elect ourselves into or out of heaven or even hell...
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
How are they going to see it unless it is revealed? And who can reveal it, save God?

They can know "of" salvation, but knowing of (head knowledge -- which seems to be your requirement) and becoming born again from above are two different things. Or, do you disagree? To paraphrase Nicodemus, "How can we be born again?" Of course, Jesus took him to task for asking such a silly question. God can do anything God wants to do, when He wants to do it, and to whom He wants it done to. And more, we won't kick and scream. We will bow down and worship Him for allowing us the chance!

A thought... How do you deal with Romans 14:11. Surely God will be dragging every single sinful human being into His divine presence, and He WILL exert His divine sovereignty, whether or not they like it. Or, perhaps you side with Rob Bell here, and see human freedom existing to the levels where we can elect ourselves into or out of heaven or even hell...

Won't God "cause" EVERY knee to bow EVERY tongue confess jesus is Lord, to glory of God the Father?
 

Alive in Christ

New Member
Do all "camps" within the ranks of calvinism hold and teach then that faith itself is a direct Gift from God, that we Cannot exercise free will at all, that we MUST be giving it in order to believe and receive in Jesus Christ?

Well, I *believe* the answer to that is yes. There might be some fringe calivinists that understand the truth of free will, but if so, it would be a very small minority.

Probably 98% of the calvinist are blinded to the truth of free will.

Their truth standard is Calvin, rather then the scriptures.

God help them.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Well, I *believe* the answer to that is yes. There might be some fringe calivinists that understand the truth of free will, but if so, it would be a very small minority.

Probably 98% of the calvinist are blinded to the truth of free will.

Their truth standard is Calvin, rather then the scriptures.

God help them.

Depends in HOW one defines the concept of "free will"
believe ONLY Adam and jesus had "real" free will, as both had sinless human natures, and actually could make "free decisions"

Once Adam fell, ALL are in Him, except Jesus, and so are sinners, unable to come towards God, not even willing to, until/unles GOd intervines on their behalf...

BOTH Cals/Arms affirm this truth, just Arms see God extending common grace towards ALL mankind, and "makes it possible" for men to turn to Jesus can believe/reject Him as Messiah.
Cals tend to see it as God providing specific Grace to His elected out person, who WILL turn and place faith in jesus...

Both see faith as necessary, just differ on if ALL or SOME can actually turn to Jesus and become Christians...

ONLY the Hyper ends of Arms/Cal deny free will need to be exercised by person in order to be saved!
 

Winman

Active Member
What do the scriptures show?

John 20:29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

Do you see any magic here? Jesus himself said Thomas believed because he saw him.

John 1:50 Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

How about here? Do you see some magical regeneration that caused Nathanael to believe?

John 4:39 And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did.

How about here? Did the woman at the well have the supernatural ability to make the men of her town believe?

John 4:40 So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days.
41 And many more believed because of his own word;
42 And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.

Again, anything magical here, or does it say they believed Jesus simply because of his words?

John 2:23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.

It does say Jesus performed miracles here, but not that he supernaturally regenerated these persons, it says they believed because they saw his miracles.

John 8:30 As he spake these words, many believed on him.

What caused them to believe?

Acts 9:42 And it was known throughout all Joppa; and many believed in the Lord.

Peter had just raised Dorcas from the dead, and the news of this spread through Joppa. Did those who told others have power to regenerate others?

Acts 18:8 And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized.

Again, anything magical here?

I could probably show you at least ten more examples, but I think you get the drift.

Men have the ability to believe, although no man could possibly believe in Jesus unless they have heard of him. Men can believe by seeing miracles, men can believe by being convinced or persuaded by sound arguments from scripture, men can believe by hearing the testimony of others.

Men cannot believe in a vacuum, but men can believe in Jesus when he is revealed to them. This revelation comes from God, therefore God gets all the credit. Without this revelation all men would be in utter darkness and could not possibly believe. But God doesn't have to magically change a man's soul to believe, all men are created with the God given ability to believe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Skandelon

<b>Moderator</b>
How are they going to see it unless it is revealed? And who can reveal it, save God?
Exactly! And who sent the powerful gospel if not God?

They can know "of" salvation, but knowing of (head knowledge -- which seems to be your requirement) and becoming born again from above are two different things
I agree. They are two different things, but what keeps something as powerful as the truth of the gospel, that is known in your head from affecting your heart?
 

glfredrick

New Member
Exactly! And who sent the powerful gospel if not God?

I agree. They are two different things, but what keeps something as powerful as the truth of the gospel, that is known in your head from affecting your heart?

One's own "affecting your heart" is not the same as God in-dwelling (causing one to become born again from above in a supernatural sense) that individual. Can you not see the distinction, or is your system so centered on the actions of man that God is irrelevant, save for giving us a word and an example? You are drifting again into Pelagian waters... And that is not offered as some derogatory moniker. The more you argue FOR anthropocentric salvation the less you need God.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reply to Skandelon

Actually, I've debated many Calvinists here and read many Calvinistic scholars who are very careful to say that men do make a choice or a decision. They just believe that the choice is determined by their desire and that desire is always according to their nature, which is determined by God through His effectual working. It's called "compatibilism."

This is just yet another word game, a "moving the goal posts logical fallacy."

God arranged the Fall, and caused via the curse, as a consequence of Adam's sin that we were (1) made sinners and (2) were corrupted such that we are predisposed to sin. What Calvinism does is add to these biblical truths, that our corruption results in "always" desiring sinful stuff and "never" desiring God.

Now to create the illusion in the minds of the mislead, that the Calvinism view does not make God the author of sin, they say all mankind makes a "free-will" "choice" to sin. But if God's curse makes us unable to choose something other than sinful stuff, that just "moves the goal post" and attempts to hid the obvious in a cloud of arcane verbiage, i.e compatibilism.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reply to AresMan,

The difference is likely that you believe God has given every individual "faith" (i.e. an objectless attribute), and then each person has the autonomous ability to "place" it in whatever object. Either that, or you believe in Total Depravity that is overridden by "prevenient grace" once a person hears the gospel message.


I believe that when the Scriptures talk about "faith" in soteriological contexts, it is really a synonym for "faith in the gospel," "faith in God for Who He is", etc. "For all men have not faith" (2 Thessalonians 3:2).

If someone actually has "faith" (given by God) that person is a believer in the gospel (2 Peter 1:1; 1 Peter 1:21; Philippians 1:29).

Did not God create mankind and "give" mankind the capacity to rely and trust in what we believe is true? Yes.

Did not God give us the revelation of Himself and His Christ, and implore us to believe in Him? Yes

Thus "faith" used as a noun and meaning that which we put our trust in, the information, i.e the name of Christ, is "gift" and the capacity to trust in that revelation is a gift, but we autonomously "choose" to trust in Christ or not if we (1) are exposed to the gospel and (2) our heart is not so hardened that we cannot understand the gospel.

The NASB renders 2 Thessalonians 3:2, "and that we may be delivered from perverse and evil men, for not all have faith." So the actual idea is some men do have faith but not everyone.

The same Greek word, in verb form is usually translated "believe" (believed, believing) and refers to our autonomous choice to trust in the "faith" (noun meaning information provided by the gospel).

And finally the same Greek word is also translated as faithful when the context seems to indicate that is the idea, i.e the fruit of the Spirit is faithfulness.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reply to Savedbymercy

Faith an effect of New Birth



New Birth or Regeneration is inseparable from it's effect, one of which is Faith [For Faith is a fruit of the Spirit Gal 5:22], now without New Birth, a Spiritual Renewal Titus 3:5, we cannot savingly believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. This is so because the message of the cross, the gospel of His accomplishments, must be apprehended by a spiritual faith in order to be converted.

New Birth is God's act, particularly the Holy Spirit, but Faith or believing is the act of the regenerated person by the enablement of the Spirit of God Heb 13:21

21Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

The parable of the sower and the different soils illustrate a good point about subjective Faith, believing to the saving of the soul Heb 10:39.

Now Matt 13:23; Mk 4:20; Lk 8:15, The good ground is a New Heart or a Regenerated Heart given as a Covenant Blessing Ezk 36:26. Now the message of the Gospel, the seed, sowed on such a Heart or Ground Understands, keeps it, and bears fruit [ Gal 5:22]. Now one cannot believe they are Justified, unless they are Justified. The regenerated heart heart cannot but believe the message of the gospel, for thats the end for which the New Heart was given, to receive the good news of salvation Eph 1:13

Back up in Heb 13:21. It states that God works in us that which is wellpleasing in His sight.

Now what is it that is wellpleasing in God's sight ? The word well pleasing is the greek word euarestos:

well pleasing, acceptable

Now the word please as in Heb 11:6

6But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

The word please here is out of the root word for well pleasing.

Its the word euaresteō:


to be well pleasing

2) to be well pleased with a thing

So, Faith that which is well pleasing in God's sight is worked in us by the blessings of the blood of the everlasting Covenant by being given a New Heart.

I don't believe it can be made more plainer that Faith that pleases God has to be worked in us or given by His Spirit !

Actually two presalvation gifts are spoken of in scripture, before salvation we have the gifts of God's revelation and the gift of being able to autonomously rely and trust in that revelation.

And then when we are saved, by God spiritually placing us in Christ, and sealed in Christ with the Holy Spirit, we get more gifts. The fruit of the Spirit, applicable to all believers, is faithfulness. Every saved, born again, regenerated child of God gets this gift which provides not only our eternal security (1 Peter 1:3-5) but also enables us to bear the fruit of faithful service. We strive to utilize that part of the gift to an ever greater degree.

Additionally some but not all saved people are gifted with "faith" meaning they provide the body of Christ with solid examples of what we all strive to be, powerful servants of God whose reliance on God provides a lesson for all. 1 Corinthians 12:7-9 is talking about separate gifts of the spirit after salvation, and since the gift of faith in view here is not given to everyone, it can have nothing to do with salvation. Based on 1 Corinthians 13:2, the gift of faith appears to be strong trust and no doubt, so that (using Jesus’ hyperbole) they could move mountains. These people would lead the way in training others to grow in faith and lean not on their own understanding.

Regeneration, rebirth, being made spiritually alive, occurs when we are spiritually placed in Christ and not while we are outside of Christ in a spiritually dead state. That is the meaning of regeneration. Calvinism tries to say we are somehow made alive, regenerated, quickened before we are spiritually placed in Christ. But no support for that false premise will be forthcoming. So the order of salvation is God gives all the capacity to believe, and then provides the revelation for us to believe in, and if we autonomously choose to believe in Christ with all our heart, then God credits our worthless faith as righteousness and spiritually places us in Christ where we are made alive together with Christ, with a new heart and as a spiritual child of God we have the right to become physical children of God, our predestined inheritance, at the second coming of Christ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AresMan

Active Member
Site Supporter
Actually, I believe as Paul explains in Romans 10, that "faith comes through hearing" and "how will they believe in whom they have not heard?"
I agree. However, faith effectually comes from hearing (listening).

Jas 1:17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Jas 1:18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.


James 1:18 says that God regenerated by using the word of truth. "Of his own will" is a participle which means "counseling." Counseling (determinately, he brought us forth. Yes, God uses His Word! He does it effectually according to His own will.

I believe all our systems over complicate the simplicity of the Gospel. Someone being lost and hearing the way out; someone being an enemy and hearing an appeal to be reconciled; someone reaching the end of their rope and crying out for help. It doesn't need to be anymore difficult than that.
Yes, everyone's experience is different. The simplest way to say it is "God did it all!"
 

glfredrick

New Member
This is just yet another word game, a "moving the goal posts logical fallacy."

God arranged the Fall, and caused via the curse, as a consequence of Adam's sin that we were (1) made sinners and (2) were corrupted such that we are predisposed to sin. What Calvinism does is add to these biblical truths, that our corruption results in "always" desiring sinful stuff and "never" desiring God.

Now to create the illusion in the minds of the mislead, that the Calvinism view does not make God the author of sin, they say all mankind makes a "free-will" "choice" to sin. But if God's curse makes us unable to choose something other than sinful stuff, that just "moves the goal post" and attempts to hid the obvious in a cloud of arcane verbiage, i.e compatibilism.

Van, you have missed the mark in both directions with your comments on Calvinism. And, no, this is not just some put down because you have it all figured out -- it is a call for you to ACTUALLY figure some of this stuff out before you go and place your foot in your mouth once again.

Calvinism DOES NOT stipulate that "our corruption results in "always" desiring sinful stuff and "never" desiring God." You misunderstand total depravity. Calvinism does stipulate, however, that our choices will be in line with our nature, which is sinful. In any case, even if a great and godly "choice" is made by a person, that choice is of no consequence in the hierarchy of God, for God has made plain that our works are nothing but "filthy rags." (Isa 64:6, a concept picked up by Paul and carried forward into the NT era.)

Neither does Calvinism "say all mankind makes a "free-will" "choice" to sin..." We do not advocate "free-will" in that manner. Mankind sins because we are sinners. Really no choice in the matter at all. We just do what comes naturally. Also, God is NOT the author of sin. To even suggest such -- for the sake of argument or otherwise -- is blasphemy! No person claiming the name of Christ can say that there is ANY darkness within God! Using this as a means of argument means one of two things... 1) You need to repent, for you are carrying on the work of the enemy, becoming "the accuser of the brethren; or 2) You are simply misinformed and need to first learn the truth, then recant and make public the truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top