This was not my personal belief. Those who have questioned a persons original confession to me they are playing God because who can know a mans heart.
Those who believe in OSAS cannot explain the Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. What I heard on this thread was dealing with Jesus not the Holy Spirit. Nor can they seem to give a logical explanation for the scriptures that talk about a falling away and about Apostasy.
People say well if salvation can be handed back then it isn't worth anything and my reply is who are we as mere humans to question salvation no matter what God chooses to do.
OSAS to me is too close to predestination. I cannot except the doctrine that people are predestined to be saved or lost. That would take away the fact that man has been given a free will.
I know what scriptures people try to use but these scriptures are talking about the fact that salvation through the blood of Jesus was predestined to happen. From the foundation of the world this plan was conceived. From the foundation of the world was a book of life created.
I have read how scriptures have been twisted to fit this doctrine such as Jesus prayer to his father about his apostles and people have taken this and made it about future believers. They quote that Jesus said no man can remove a person but Jesus did not state the individual could not walk away. It sounds like peoples wills are overrided by God and God is going to force people into Heaven.
When you bring up Demas then you hear that he never was a real believer but I cannot agree with that. As great an apostle as Paul was who also performed miracles etc would be so blinded that he would not have known Demas had not made a real committment. Demas, and Rufus and Alexander, and others mentioned in the New TEstament who walked away are too inconvenient for those who believe in OSAS. All those whom Peter called Wandering Stars and Brute Beasts are too inconvenient.
So are those whom Jude refered to but again these people were never really believers because that is the only explanation those who believe in OSAS .
I know God's grace is sufficient. I also know we cannot sin more than God's grace. Yet we can make the choice not to repent and to continue to live in sin. We can rebel and totally turn away from God and never make an effort to serve him again. Even Peters words when he states it would be better for those who have believed this truth but turned away from God to have never known this truth is ignored because it hinders this doctrine.
There has been comparisons of salvation unto gifts. Then we hear about the sonship of a believer by stating a sonship cannot be revoked and that is true but why will not anyone admit that a Father can punish a son even unto death?
It has happened over and over again. Why did Jewish fathers kill their sons? They were disobedient and rebellious.
The scriptures state that God is not willing for anyone to perish so I believe the Holy Spirit deals with heavy conviction those who have gone astray. Yet if an individual ignores the conviction over and over and over again there is a limit to his mercy. Not his grace but his mercy.
Another thing I don't think those who believe OSAS refuse to deal with is that God never changes. How could God be just to have judged King Saul for his disobedience. He was called God's anointed. Then you have Nadab and Abihu who were priests unto the Lord. What were their sin. Disobedience.
What about Solomon. KIng of Israel. He turned to idolatry. Are we going to say he went to Heaven anyway? How could God justify judging people in the Old Testament like the above people and allowing people in the church to just go on through life living in rebellion and sin and take them to Heaven. He would have to apologize.
Those who believe in OSAS cannot explain the Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. What I heard on this thread was dealing with Jesus not the Holy Spirit. Nor can they seem to give a logical explanation for the scriptures that talk about a falling away and about Apostasy.
People say well if salvation can be handed back then it isn't worth anything and my reply is who are we as mere humans to question salvation no matter what God chooses to do.
OSAS to me is too close to predestination. I cannot except the doctrine that people are predestined to be saved or lost. That would take away the fact that man has been given a free will.
I know what scriptures people try to use but these scriptures are talking about the fact that salvation through the blood of Jesus was predestined to happen. From the foundation of the world this plan was conceived. From the foundation of the world was a book of life created.
I have read how scriptures have been twisted to fit this doctrine such as Jesus prayer to his father about his apostles and people have taken this and made it about future believers. They quote that Jesus said no man can remove a person but Jesus did not state the individual could not walk away. It sounds like peoples wills are overrided by God and God is going to force people into Heaven.
When you bring up Demas then you hear that he never was a real believer but I cannot agree with that. As great an apostle as Paul was who also performed miracles etc would be so blinded that he would not have known Demas had not made a real committment. Demas, and Rufus and Alexander, and others mentioned in the New TEstament who walked away are too inconvenient for those who believe in OSAS. All those whom Peter called Wandering Stars and Brute Beasts are too inconvenient.
So are those whom Jude refered to but again these people were never really believers because that is the only explanation those who believe in OSAS .
I know God's grace is sufficient. I also know we cannot sin more than God's grace. Yet we can make the choice not to repent and to continue to live in sin. We can rebel and totally turn away from God and never make an effort to serve him again. Even Peters words when he states it would be better for those who have believed this truth but turned away from God to have never known this truth is ignored because it hinders this doctrine.
There has been comparisons of salvation unto gifts. Then we hear about the sonship of a believer by stating a sonship cannot be revoked and that is true but why will not anyone admit that a Father can punish a son even unto death?
It has happened over and over again. Why did Jewish fathers kill their sons? They were disobedient and rebellious.
The scriptures state that God is not willing for anyone to perish so I believe the Holy Spirit deals with heavy conviction those who have gone astray. Yet if an individual ignores the conviction over and over and over again there is a limit to his mercy. Not his grace but his mercy.
Another thing I don't think those who believe OSAS refuse to deal with is that God never changes. How could God be just to have judged King Saul for his disobedience. He was called God's anointed. Then you have Nadab and Abihu who were priests unto the Lord. What were their sin. Disobedience.
What about Solomon. KIng of Israel. He turned to idolatry. Are we going to say he went to Heaven anyway? How could God justify judging people in the Old Testament like the above people and allowing people in the church to just go on through life living in rebellion and sin and take them to Heaven. He would have to apologize.