Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Do we all have the SAME Free Will To choose As Adam Had? yes or no?
No; no tree of life here. But there could, of course, be a woman as a bad influence.
Our wills prior to redemption are not free. See John 8.
In short with a yes or no answer?
No.
I've witnessed many preachers assure a person they are saved because they 'chose' by free will long ago, and said persons say 'I know what I believe in my heart!' :sleep: whilst they live lives that deny they are born from above.
BUT some PREACHER told them if they say this prayer and mean it they're going to heaven and take them back to that time again and again.
Utter foolishness.
Our wills are not undamaged, as Adam's originally was, but our wills are still free, in that we still have the ability and right to choose.
:thumbsup:
:thumbsup: Our wills are already pre-disposed towards corruption unlike Adam's, but as far as the capacity to make either right or wrong choices, they are still free.
Yeshua....let's take this line by line:Adam though had true free will, while we are sinners by nature, so we would bre restricted to wht we can actually choose to do!
!Freedom to decide to do something, but limited to what the options actually are that we can choose to do
Our status as a "sinner by nature" (you are correct) does not effect whether or not libertarian "free-will" exists. We can choose in that nothing compels or requires or necessitates the choices we make. A persons will is "free" just in case he might have chosen to do otherwise. It isn't a question of what we are pre-disposed towards. You have an assumption about the classic compatibilist assertion that people choose only and always according to their "greatest desire" and moreover....that we cannot have wishes or preferences about what our desires might be. The compatibilist schema usually ignores the fact that we can desire/wish that our desires were other than what they are.....Just food for thought there.Adam though had true free will, while we are sinners by nature
Firstly, your definition is somewhat flawed in that the option either TO ACT or NOT TO ACT at all....is not represented...but also, all libertarianly free choices are limited. EVERY choice is "limited". I cannot "choose" to fly by flapping my arms. Freedom of will exists only in respect to the ability to choose between available options. The common (modern) Calvie schema pre-supposes that all "choices" are necessarily pre-destined by the condition in which the actuary (the human) finds themselves...ultimately, that means they are automatons.Freedom to decide to do something, but limited to what the options actually are that we can choose to do
yes or no?
Our will is free in that God has, by his sovereign plan, authority and power, given us the ability to choose Him or reject Him.
Our wills are not undamaged, as Adam's originally was, but our wills are still free, in that we still have the ability and right to choose.
Forgive me as I'm new here, but most of my Arminian friends would disagree with the statement that we have the right to choose. Most that I know would say that God graciously gave us prevenient grace in his mercy, not because he was obligated. That grace allows us the ability to choose something other than death.
Is that not the majority position?
Forgive me as I'm new here, but most of my Arminian friends would disagree with the statement that we have the right to choose. Most that I know would say that God graciously gave us prevenient grace in his mercy, not because he was obligated. That grace allows us the ability to choose something other than death.
Is that not the majority position?
Our will is free in that God has by his sovereign plan, authority and power given us the ability to choose Him or reject Him.
I am not Arminian.
I see that. How do you ground man's right to choose?