So you're saying that the doxology of 2 Cor 13:14 is not referring to the Trinity?
The consensus of every theologian in history is the same argument the Catholics use for their doctrines and practices that the Protestants, or Low Protestants, at least, do not agree with. That was the universal consensus before the Reformation, except for a few small groups, who were universally rejected as heretical. And people did question it, but then were not considered "orthodox" based on that; just like those small groups who differed from the other Catholic doctrines.
Yes, the scriptures acknowledge Father, Son and Spirit, and often in that order, but it was not made into such a precise formula until the fourth century, and that to confront the heretical views. Then, the scriptures and earlier fathers were interpreted in light of the later theological development. You can even see this stuff admitted in places like Kelley's Early Christian Doctrine, Harper's Bible dictionary, etc.
The consensus of every theologian in history is the same argument the Catholics use for their doctrines and practices that the Protestants, or Low Protestants, at least, do not agree with. That was the universal consensus before the Reformation, except for a few small groups, who were universally rejected as heretical. And people did question it, but then were not considered "orthodox" based on that; just like those small groups who differed from the other Catholic doctrines.
Yes, the scriptures acknowledge Father, Son and Spirit, and often in that order, but it was not made into such a precise formula until the fourth century, and that to confront the heretical views. Then, the scriptures and earlier fathers were interpreted in light of the later theological development. You can even see this stuff admitted in places like Kelley's Early Christian Doctrine, Harper's Bible dictionary, etc.