Amy.G said:
There is no question that we are saved by grace through faith and nothing else. I have never said otherwise. I am saying there is a change in a person when they are converted. How else can we examine ourselves if there has never been any change? If we stay the same what would be the comparison? If we stayed the same as the old man after conversion, were we really converted?
This is why we should examine ourselves.
2Cr 13:5 Test yourselves {to see} if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you--unless indeed you fail the test?
What does it mean to fail the test?
I'm still waiting for some scripture from you.
I gave you the single criterion for determining if you are saved or not. "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved"/
The test is have you believed the gospel or are you seeking salvation through some other means. If you believe then YOU ARE IN THE FAITH.
Again, if the criterion is single, faith in Christ. YOU are the one contending there is some unknowable additional numbers of measurements.
First you start out that there are certain measurements. Then you say you meant SPECIFIC and then you want to scratch it. All the while I have repeatedly said the same thing: There is one criterion, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved" Now that is what is called Scripture. That is the criterion. I don't hold to some mysterious multiple measures you hold to so I am not the one required to post additional Scriptures.
As far as the one you post about testing one's self, it only supports what I said. It states to examine if you are in the faith. One is in the faith...how? By believing on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Enough time for now has been devoted here. Sunday evening provides other fun at home than just posting so my attention will be elsewhere tonight. I have provided the Scripture clearly stating the criterion for determining one is saved is: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved". I realize you aren't satisfied but that is your problem, but the fact is, is that it is Scripture and it is the single criterion.
But if you ever can tackle it here is my question you have yet to answer:
Alex Quackenbush said:
But that aside of course a person can be saved and show no outward signs. But this begs the question. How long is a person allowed to go without showing an outward sign before they have to be declared UNSAVED by themselves? You see the dilemma you are producing with such an arbitrary standard?
Christians go seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months or years without outward signs. So when is the cut-off? Every time you sin you certainly aren't showing an outward sign. So does that make you unsaved. Oh but you might say, you rebound from that and return to spirituality. Okay. But for whatever time you committed that sin you showed no sign but that of a sinner. So again, how much time is a person permitted to be in sin after salvation and not show an outward sign before they must be declared unsaved by themselves?