Brother Bob
New Member
twisted for sure but not the song
npetreley
I recommend that free-willers remain silent during songs like Amazing Grace, too. If you don't believe it, don't sing it, or you're being hypocritical. WoW!
It would CERTAINLY be hyprocritical for free-willers to sing this one by Isaac Watts: WoW!
Yes, I'm perfectly aware of the fact that people are free to change the lyrics of songs in the public domain, and many do in order to change what offends them. People do that even to the Bible. Again!
So if you were a feminist, you wouldn't be a hypocrite if you studied a Bible where the words were changed to remove fact that God is portrayed as male and Father. Likewise, you wouldn't be a hypocrite to sing this rewritten version of the song. Wow again!
But you would be a hypocrite to sing the original. Double WoW!!
The song does not blatanly espouse election, but yes, the song takes the tone of election. More so if you know about the author. "I once was lost but now I'm found" is not something that turns on our decision. Free willers can come up with a twisted explanation of how the two may coincide, but this was clearly not the author's intent. hmmmm!
Nevertheless, as I said above, since you can twist Amazing Grace into a song that embraces both free will and election, I offered another example by Isaac Watts that affords no such reinterpretation. People actually had to rewrite Isaac Watts words to get the election out of them.
It didn't flop, I just flip-flopped it back at you. Oh Well!!!
Must be the anger management class you took npet; The nerve of you thinking you can sit in judgement of free-willers even
singing a song, and call it "being Christian". Sounds like a Scripture that comes to mind, they will kill you and say they do God a
service. I honestly think you need to go back for some more counseling, for it is obvious that you can’t get along with no one
but Calvinist. If being a Calvinist is to condemn others as you do, then it is not being a Christian. There is more but I will let it
go at that, for the moment. There is such a thing as being a fanatic about something, and I think you have reached that level in
Calvinism. Are you trying to impress the others? Is that it npet? Well in doing so you have left your first "Love". You do flip
flop from post to post saying these kind of things to others and then say they got a problem getting angry about it. You got a
problem with having compassion, kindness and replace it with cruelty, condemnation always in judgement of others. I wonder
why you feel so qualified to be the judge of others when you have had to go to anger management classes yourself. We only
get angry when someone like you make remarks against us.
npetreley
I recommend that free-willers remain silent during songs like Amazing Grace, too. If you don't believe it, don't sing it, or you're being hypocritical. WoW!
It would CERTAINLY be hyprocritical for free-willers to sing this one by Isaac Watts: WoW!
Yes, I'm perfectly aware of the fact that people are free to change the lyrics of songs in the public domain, and many do in order to change what offends them. People do that even to the Bible. Again!
So if you were a feminist, you wouldn't be a hypocrite if you studied a Bible where the words were changed to remove fact that God is portrayed as male and Father. Likewise, you wouldn't be a hypocrite to sing this rewritten version of the song. Wow again!
But you would be a hypocrite to sing the original. Double WoW!!
The song does not blatanly espouse election, but yes, the song takes the tone of election. More so if you know about the author. "I once was lost but now I'm found" is not something that turns on our decision. Free willers can come up with a twisted explanation of how the two may coincide, but this was clearly not the author's intent. hmmmm!
Nevertheless, as I said above, since you can twist Amazing Grace into a song that embraces both free will and election, I offered another example by Isaac Watts that affords no such reinterpretation. People actually had to rewrite Isaac Watts words to get the election out of them.
It didn't flop, I just flip-flopped it back at you. Oh Well!!!
Must be the anger management class you took npet; The nerve of you thinking you can sit in judgement of free-willers even
singing a song, and call it "being Christian". Sounds like a Scripture that comes to mind, they will kill you and say they do God a
service. I honestly think you need to go back for some more counseling, for it is obvious that you can’t get along with no one
but Calvinist. If being a Calvinist is to condemn others as you do, then it is not being a Christian. There is more but I will let it
go at that, for the moment. There is such a thing as being a fanatic about something, and I think you have reached that level in
Calvinism. Are you trying to impress the others? Is that it npet? Well in doing so you have left your first "Love". You do flip
flop from post to post saying these kind of things to others and then say they got a problem getting angry about it. You got a
problem with having compassion, kindness and replace it with cruelty, condemnation always in judgement of others. I wonder
why you feel so qualified to be the judge of others when you have had to go to anger management classes yourself. We only
get angry when someone like you make remarks against us.
Last edited by a moderator: