Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Two presuppositions which Arminians (et al like them) bring into every discussion are, "Free Will", and God's "unconditional" love for every single person.
Does God love everyone in the same manner? Does He have electing love for every single person?
Why don't you start by quoting some actual non-Calvinist theologians (like, e.g., Leighton Flowers, a.k.a. Skandelon on this board) who discuss their views and then we can start from there, instead of creating and arguing against a strawman?
Do you love each of your children in the same manner?Two presuppositions which Arminians (et al like them) bring into every discussion are, "Free Will", and God's "unconditional" love for every single person.
Does God love everyone in the same manner? Does He have electing love for every single person?
Do you love each of your children in the same manner?
Are all people God's children?
Are they all His creation?Are all people God's children?
Are they all His creation?
I agree with Jesus; and I know the reference you're alluding to. Now, are all people created by God?Are they al His children? Jesus answered that question. Do you agree with Him?
I agree with Jesus; and I know the reference you're alluding to.
So God did not create you or me? Asking for clarity.Then that answers your question. God's loves His own - His elect, in a salvific manner.
God created Adam and Eve directly, and then they reproduced.
So God did not create you or me? Asking for clarity.
Not directly.So God did not create you or me? Asking for clarity.
I'll be curious to see how the Finneyists answer this one.
How much of Finney's Lectures in Systematic Theology have you read? What foundational tenets of the faith does he deny? Citations, please!
Leighton has tried and failed over and over. He is in the process of drifting into more error as we speak. It is a mistake to call him a theologian when he could not exegete romans 9 in his failed debate....He is a nice guy...but drifting....badly.Why don't you start by quoting some actual non-Calvinist theologians (like, e.g., Leighton Flowers, a.k.a. Skandelon on this board) who discuss their views and then we can start from there, instead of creating and arguing against a strawman?
No citations from Finney's Theology? Didn't think so.