Well now... the context to the verse is only the Apostles . So that might identify the problem as in your court. I can demonstrate that fo
r you very easily
It is surprising that snip you have missed this .
.
This is a good topic (one we will not have enough time to discuss here).
I believe that when the Spirit was sent He was sent as a helper to Christians. I do not believe that apart from God's Spirit one can discern spiritual things.
This is what some Baptists have referred to the "indwelling" of the Spirit. That you find this problematic is very interesting to me as I was not aware there were Baptists who denied this work of God in the lives of believers.
But this is a key (probably THE key) that separates us in how we view the "meat" of the Word. I do not believe the Holy Spirit revealed to the Apostles truth and His work was done. So the "meat" of the Word is not something I view as an apprehension of knowledge, but rather the working of God.
And once again I did not say anything that you just posted about.This is a good topic (one we will not have enough time to discuss here).
I believe that when the Spirit was sent He was sent as a helper to Christians. I do not believe that apart from God's Spirit one can discern spiritual things.
This is what some Baptists have referred to the "indwelling" of the Spirit. That you find this problematic is very interesting to me as I was not aware there were Baptists who denied this work of God in the lives of believers.
But this is a key (probably THE key) that separates us in how we view the "meat" of the Word. I do not believe the Holy Spirit revealed to the Apostles truth and His work was done. So the "meat" of the Word is not something I view as an apprehension of knowledge, but rather the working of God.
I said nothing about baptists who deny the work of the Spirit
I will post when I get online where we can have plenty of time to.post clearly