Featured Does God Want Children To Be Abused?

[snipped] which neglects human responsibility as per their divinely given design along with a demonstration of a carnal mentality that would attempt to cast blame and attribute evil onto an Omnibenevolent God – all for sake of trying to uphold a false doctrine of a Deterministically Sovereign god! Sad…

Deu 32:39
(39) See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.

See now that I am He – learn by your sad human freedom experience, [snipped] that God alone can destroy and your idols can’t help you neglect your responsibilities.

I (God) kill and I make alive, wound and heal, - for His Mercy is as great as His justice and He will punish the rebellious [snipped] Deu 32:4 He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.

 

Why thank you Bob...:thumbs:

I'm so sorry, I thought I was attacking the view not the person similar to this example:

But, to get past any notion by me that there "could" be some kind of bias and/or hypocrisy in this I’ll certainly give you the benefit of the doubt and humbly repair my post as per “your” upstanding monitory guidelines while being sure to leave enough in as to maintain my full point which I’m afraid you "inadvertently" might have cut out in your endeavor to maintain the high standards of ethical debate on this board. Thanks again. :thumbs:

I feel much better now that we've gotten this problem straightened out.:love2:

 

I agree, personal attacks seem to be running wild around here and people don't seem to understand the difference between a personal attack (Ad Hominem) and one on the position and simply fire back as if it was personal and feeling justified in doing so.

One "rule" it would be wise maintain is to be careful not to "offend" the "authorities" that be when doing their... "job" ...here, that might put one over the line. You wouldn't want to give an excuse, if you know what I mean, to justify banning you ...that is if you care.

FYI, Another rule that could quickly get one banned here is to call another a "heretic" directly or even at the position, but I do not believe any true Christian would object to calling an actual heresy a "heresy" such as "if" one was going about to directly attribute evil to God. (yep, been here a while and actually remember a time when directly attributing evil to God would get one banned (because such is an heresy), but that seems to have gone out the door)

Of course, abuse of such a "lethal" rule (such as the dreaded "heresy" word) "could" be taken advantage of by a moderator if he one were of that mindset to do so.

But, I'm sure none of the moderators on this board would do that!

 

Which, being interpreted, meaneth......Motherrrrrrrrrrr!

 

Answer is NO!
Exo_21:22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Deu_22:25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die:

As far as children are concerned Christ said;

Mat_18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
We should be mindful of the fact that any harm offends.
MB

 

You claimed to have been a Calvinist and you spew this kind of nonsense. There is a distinct difference between the STATE of salvation and the STATE of a theological mind. One can be totally deceived mentally and yet be saved. You can fall from the TRUTH of grace without falling from the STATE of grace.

I don't know of many children of God at their salvation who even knew who Calvin was much less any doctrine. Teaching comes after salvation (Mt. 28:20).

You can be saved and not know a thing about Calvinism or Arminism. However, if you are saved you were not saved contrary to the doctrine of Grace.

However, for you to spew the nonsense that a lost person who is completely ignorant of any systematic doctrine must believe in any systme of teaching in order to be saved is rediculous. If you don't know the difference then you need to be taken back to sunday school and taught the basics. However, I think you do know the difference and you are intentionally spewing this nonsense because it suits your purpose.

 

Salvation comes after hearing and genuine faith from your own heart. (Eph 1:13, Rom 10:9)

That question begging rhetoric is supposed to logically mean something to prove your "grace alone" claim???


P.S.

(Rom 10:9) If you declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

Note: You is used 4 times in this verse. You'll be surprised by how much "you" there is in a book that supposedly says that we do nothing.

 

Your inference is rediculous as you fully well know that God determinately permits evil but never delights in evil (Psa. 76:10). So it is never a question about God delighting in evil and evil things but only a question of determined permission of what he hates in order to rule and overrule to the utlimate good of His people and His glory.

God uses evil to chasten his people and nations. He uses evil to render justice upon the guilty. God never delights in evil but He most certainly DETERMINED to permit it.

 

<SIGH...>

Question posed was not about God permitting or delighting in evil. You are not addressing the OP. Fail.