I did not take it as an attack, but to be honest, I did not know how to read the "tone".
Dave, Id never give a valued friend a frontal attack....I'd PM you if I had issue.:godisgood:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I did not take it as an attack, but to be honest, I did not know how to read the "tone".
Self Esteem? Self esteem originates from self. God esteems man in a pure and holy way and that originates from Him.No humanist BS, however they teach you that at Annapolis & West Point ... Its called leadership. Besides my self esteem comes naturally when I'm aligned with who-I am-in God. Again you should try it some time.
Dave, Id never give a valued friend a frontal attack....I'd PM you if I had issue.:godisgood:
Self Esteem? Self esteem originates from self. God esteems man in a pure and holy way and that originates from Him.
I find the Bible to do a better job of theology. I am waiting for one of them to come up with a theology of evil considering 1 Sam 16:14-23.In other words the Calvinists are right about Gods Sovereignty.
I humbly do not agree....Rather we should know ourselves, our beliefs etc & hold ourselves & our beliefs in the highest esteem. If you do not have superb self esteem , others will have no esteem for you.
Uh-oh. hot-button alert! New thread topic: Can you be humble and and have a superb self-esteem at the same time?
EWT, since you pushed the button, would you care to move this discussion to another thread. Probably the General Baptist section would be a good place for it.
I find the Bible to do a better job of theology. I am waiting for one of them to come up with a theology of evil considering 1 Sam 16:14-23.
I have and it is interesting to see the dance.Id say there is another good thread to start if you want discussion on it.
Curious about your implication here. Are you saying that Arminians deny that God is sovereign?In other words the Calvinists are right about Gods Sovereignty. Thank You!:thumbs:
The point of the OP was to consider the FACT that if we (non-Calvinists) are wrong, then no eternal harm is done. We are only doing what God decreed for us to do and we ultimately couldn't have done otherwise. The same number of people will be saved regardless of our "false" teaching.
BUT, if Calvinists are wrong just consider the damage they have done. How many people have they lead astray? How many people have they distracted with their false teaching? How many people have they repulsed from Christ with their difficult doctrines? How many churches have they split? etc etc...
Again, I'm only supposing the eternal effect that each camp would have IF it is wrong. Calvinists, you need to consider that your error is much more grave than ours, so tread lightly and carefully brethren.
naaaa, I will drop it....from what I understand Baptists dont have self esteem.
Balderdash !
The point of the OP is right there !
Calvinists, and consequently, those of the Doctrine of Grace persuasion are leading people to perdition, and your persuasion is the true God-leaning one.
If I can return to the OP, the answer it yes, it does matter if you're a Calvinist. It matters if you're not one.
It matters because each soteriology contains certain assumptions, from which each presents the gospel.
For instance, non-Calvinists believe that God has given everyone free will, and the ability to make choices. They believe that as a result, it is possible to persuade men, starting with the preaching of the gospel, followed by any number of methods to get one to make a "decision" for Christ.
Calvinists believe that God employs all the means necessary to bring his elect to salvation--including the work of the Holy Spirit in illuminating, convicting, drawing and regenerating. Even repentance toward God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ are gifts from God to his elect. Thus, the gospel is preached, the lost are exhorted to repent and believe, and the results left to the work of the Holy Spirit.
Let's don't get sidetracked here by a debate on the extent of the atonement. The point is that salvation is all of God and none of man. The debate is not over the ability to choose; it is over when that ability is given.
But that difference makes the difference in how each presents the gospel.
In fact, if you visit a church, but don't know whether the pastor is a Calvinist or a non-Cal, listen carefully to the exhortation (altar call, invitation). It will provide you enough for you to make a good guess. If no invitation is given, that's another clue.
Let me conclude this post by saying that God is not boxed in by our methods. Each soteriology can preach a pure gospel, and God is pleased to save the lost in Cal and non-Cal churches. But there is a difference in the way each calls men and women to Christ.
IMO, in the final analysis, I believe we are/will be judged on how well we live/lived 'the golden rule' while here on earth. Knowing the deep wonderful truths of the scriptures is for the benefit/joy of the Saints. But having your doctrines 'just right' has zilch to do with true religion.
Then tell me Brother, what is doctrine (DoG) & what are Confessions of Faith for? Why would anybody have even bothered to create them? ........
"Knowing the deep wonderful truths of the scriptures is for the benefit/joy of the Saints."
Isn't that enough reason to know the truth?
Or is it that you believe as Skandelon that correct head knowledge is what determines whether one will burn in hell for all eternity or not?
I think you are majoring on the minors here. Everything I have comes from God. Our attitudes should be as Paul's, "If I'm to boast, I will boast in Christ"....regardless of what the USMC teaches youI just wanted to point out a problem with this phrase. And, in giving you the benefit of the doubt, I wanted to point it out because I don't think you mean to be saying what you are saying.
If your trust rests entirely in God and something else, then you trust does not rest entirely in God.
Furthermore, it would seem that you are trusting in two things: 1.) God and 2.) Yourself--as evidenced in the "gifts" and "talents" you now wield.
Now, I don't think you mean to say this. I just wanted to point out that it may be taken way differently from what you intended to convey.
The Archangel