You think I was being humorous? What kind of silly question is that to ask?Be serious Rippon....what are they doing for God's Kingdom?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You think I was being humorous? What kind of silly question is that to ask?Be serious Rippon....what are they doing for God's Kingdom?
You think I was being humorous? What kind of silly question is that to ask?
You have in fact been lumping things together. To mix metaphors you paint with too wide of a brush. You think seminaries in general are lame. But that's just stinkin' thinkin'. Are you able to reel off names of respectable Christian seminaries? Or are you just comfortable throwing grenades? You need to amend your faulty remarks. Qualify them.
Because your Alma mater has departed from the Faith does not mean most have. Stop with your guilt-by-association thinking.
Princeton is old news. I mean 84 years ago Machen started Westminster Theological Seminary because of the liberalism of Princeton!I believe Princeton was named; I lump Claremont School of Theology in there too
The point is you stated it. You seemed to make it an issue that a seminary education is a lame idea. Since it is so rotten you have to think there is a substantial trend.I'm sure others on this board could give some names of seminaries that fall into the same group as Clremont and Princeton,
Good,you're making some progress. I never said you thought "all seminaries" are lame. But you have made a rather strong indication in your OP and since that most are.I am not saying, and never would say that ALL seminaries are lame, but there are some,
best example of 'caving in" has to be Yale/harvard, as both were founded to be intionally used to train ministers of the Gosspel, Bible knowledge and being able to know and present the Gospel manditoryfor ALL graduates, look at both now!
Princeton is old news. I mean 84 years ago Machen started Westminster Theological Seminary because of the liberalism of Princeton!
Claremont is off my rador --it's just a United Methodist Seminary.
Can't you go beyond these old and isolated cases?
The point is you stated it. You seemed to make it an issue that a seminary education is a lame idea. Since it is so rotten you have to think there is a substantial trend.
Good,you're making some progress. I never said you thought "all seminaries" are lame. But you have made a rather strong indication in your OP and since that most are.
I think that among Baptist seminaries the following are pretty good:
Detroit,Luther Rice,Mid-America,and SBTS.
Among non-denominational ones: Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Dallas,Bob Jones and Master's.
Among the Reformed ones:Geneva (SC.),Puritan Reformed,Mid-America (Ind.),Westminster (East and West),Knox (Fl),Whitefield,Reformed Theological Seminary in Fl,Geo,Miss,N.C.,D.C.
May more could be names in these three groups alone. I'm thinking of Beeson Divinity School,and Biblical Theological Seninary in Pa.
Having a seminiary education at these (and other) places would be a boon for preachers.
I do not mean in any way to demean those who have attended and graduated from a seminary!! However, I have to wonder if that secondary degree is all that necessary to make the man a better preacher.
I have three friends who graduated from Claremont School of Theology, and all three have said that they never had the need to open the Bible. That is scary, if, in fact, it is true, and I don't doubt their words. Of course, they did open their Bibles, but said they could have gone the entire two years without so much as reading from the Word.
What courses did they take?
Which degree did they earn?
....send me a few hundred dollars and I'll hire a PI to get the info for you :laugh: