Does the RCC have An Inferior View On the Bible?

[Michael Wrenn]

Some of you are separating the two natures of Jesus; this was declared a heresy early on.

 

[Yeshua1]

Some of you are separating the two natures of Jesus; this was declared a heresy early on.

What do you mean? Jesus was God, divine as to His Diety, that was from God from all etrnity, while from Mary received ONLY his humanity?

 

[Walter]

Personal attacks are not tolerated and do your case no good

Your statement is a false accusation, and in and of itself is a hateful statement. Why do you direct hate toward me. What you perceive as "hate" is not directed toward any person, but to the doctrine of the RCC. Therefore you are in the wrong, not I.

You defeat your own argument. What is an apologist? You quoted my definition and used it as your own OP for this post. Here is what you said an "apologist" is:

"one who would make sure that he knows what he is talking about."
--You fit into that category don't you? So does TS. And so do many others.

You lied. The only statement I made (that I can find) about Catholic apologists), is the one that you quoted. It says nothing about "the most able apologists." Why are you lying and being deceptive. It is statements like these that earn a person infractions and eventually get them banned. Tell the truth if you are going to debate.
Remember, I am going by the definition of apologist that you posted.
Examine also the posters on this board. There are no "Baptist apologists" on this board of the caliber that you have in mind. Josh McDowell is not here. Neither is Norm Geisler. Nor any of the other apologists that travel simply for that purpose. The men and women here are either pastors, or, like Ansi and Amy, have studied on their own accord the doctrines of their own faith and the RCC faith and have become quite knowledgeable about it. You would call them, by your definition, apologists. Many of us are former Catholics, and quite aware what the Catholics teach contrary to the stomping of your feet and pounding of your fists.

Talking with Carson was one of your first big mistakes. Perhaps if you had not done that you would not be in the mess you are in today. He misrepresents many things including Scripture.

Many of them are apologists. They do have a handle on the Bible--to their own destruction:

2 Peter 3:16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; wherein are some things hard to be understood, which the ignorant and unstedfast wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
--For example, any one who equates the new birth with baptism is ignorant (of the Bible) and they wrest the Scriptures to their own destruction, for that is not what the new birth is, and yet it is one of the most important doctrines of the Bible. Yet that is what the RCC Catechism teaches.

Any person not understanding the Bible would say that.

When Catholics are not allowed on the board, their registrations denied, what conclusion would you like me to come to?

You could always ask an administrator to change your profile, explaining your situation, but you haven't done that. So the deceit is on your part, isn't it? There are many on this board who have changed their profiles. Why isn't it a problem for them, but it is for you?

It is absurd. It is the harlot church. You will find that conclusion in any 18th or 19th century Protestant commentary. Most of the Presbyterian ones come to that conclusion.
It is a religion of works that deny salvation by faith.
You cannot be a Christian and believe what the RCC teaches at the same time. It remains an impossibility. The two are at antipodes with each other.

You have accused me of lying. Yet YOU did make that statement! Here is that post that YOU made!

08-17-2009 12:11 PM
DHK Yes it is true. A decision was made by the administration some years ago to purge the board of Catholics and not allow any others in. The Catholics were using the BB as a sounding board for their religion, an advertising center, and a recruitment center. They sent some of their most able apologists here.

And for the record, I have never attacked you personally. To say something you said is 'hooey' is no more a personal attack than yours saying something I said is 'hogwash' is it? It seems you have one standard for Catholics (who you are always very quick to accuse of lying and acting in an un-Christlike manner) and quite another for yourself and the other Baptists on the board. Will you apologize for accusing me of lying?

 

[DHK]

You have accused me of lying. Yet YOU did make that statement! Here is that post that YOU made!

08-17-2009 12:11 PM
DHK Yes it is true. A decision was made by the administration some years ago to purge the board of Catholics and not allow any others in. The Catholics were using the BB as a sounding board for their religion, an advertising center, and a recruitment center. They sent some of their most able apologists here.

Walter I will just refer to this as more deceit. I went through this entire thread and said no such thing. Then I noticed that you had taken a quote from three years ago!! That is unethical. The context of this discussion is in this thread, not of what I said three years ago. In fact most of this discussion revolved around you quoting me from another poster who had not even been a member for two weeks and had only made about 100 posts. Your deceit is noted.

And for the record, I have never attacked you personally. To say something you said is 'hooey' is no more a personal attack than yours saying something I said is 'hogwash' is it? It seems you have one standard for Catholics (who you are always very quick to accuse of lying and acting in an un-Christlike manner) and quite another for yourself and the other Baptists on the board. Will you apologize for accusing me of lying?

I have pointed out the places where you made personal attacks. I have also warned you that you are defending the Catholic faith on a Baptist board. When you attack the Baptist faith on a Baptist board, you are attacking all of us, not just me. Please tread carefully.