37818
Well-Known Member
Existence exists. Existence is fundamentally self evident. Anything that is self evident is self evident because it exists.Ahh, that’s changing with the Woke “Idiot” culture.![]()
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Existence exists. Existence is fundamentally self evident. Anything that is self evident is self evident because it exists.Ahh, that’s changing with the Woke “Idiot” culture.![]()
What?????? No, I’m not saying that. I’m not even sure what you are saying.So are you saying 1 + 1 equaling 2 does not need God to be true? In which case, there never needs to be any kind of god, let alone God. Whom we who are genuine Christians should know. John 17:3.
Acts of the Apostles 17:28, ". . . For in him we live, and move, and have our being; . . ."What?????? No, I’m not saying that. I’m not even sure what you are saying.
Y[o]u seem to be saying since 1+1=2, that is evidence God exist. I don’t recall any passage of scripture that supports that, but I am open to being educated.
peace to you
Man. That's true. I thought the world of JMac and his writings on Lordship Salvation had a big part in convincing me that there was something to this Calvinism stuff. I was blown away when I read a book on God's sovereignty written by top Calvinist academics of today that completely dismissed JMac's views.
I also have actually read a lot of Puritans and what they said was not even close to what the internet Calvinist warriors are saying. And if you really want a shocker, read Augustine himself. I'm not saying he's Catholic. But he wouldn't last a second in most Reformed churches today either.
Also, I have found that there is more diverse opinion among Calvinists than between a lot of moderate Calvinists and regular Baptists.
And the most helpful thing I have discovered is that most people's opinions are much more affected by the group that they perceive as being important to be member in good standing of than any real evaluation of the truth of the positions.
Your ignorance of scripture is breathtaking, especially for someone presenting himself as a guide for understanding scripture.In a thread about sticking to truth, I see this whopper has been posted:
Scripture tells us the truth of God’s existence should be obvious from His creation. We also know from scripture the effect of sin in the lives of humans has caused them, everyone, to reject this revelation of God found in creation.What scripture says everyone because of sin rejects the revelation of God from what He has made. That would mean we have an excuse, but we have none, because God has made Himself clear to us. See Romans 1:19
Your ignorance of scripture is breathtaking, especially for someone presenting himself as a guide for understanding scripture.
That's the key. People (well meaning Christians) mistake their understanding/ interpretation of Scripture as objective truth when in fact it is as subjective as it gets.Ignorance or different interpretation?
IgnoranceIgnorance or different interpretation?
It's either ignorance or a purposeful misinterpretation of scripture in order to spread a doctrine not held by any Baptist church.Ignorance or different interpretation?
Matthew 7:21-23, ". . . Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. . . ."
Note: Existence like God is omnipresent. In which we "live and move and have our being."RE; 'What is your understanding of God being a self-evident truth? Like the concept of 1 + 1;= 2?'
Yet another use of the fallacy of an against the person argument.Your ignorance of scripture is breathtaking, especially for someone presenting himself as a guide for understanding scripture.
peace to you
Ignorance or different interpretation?
I apologize for referring to Van as ignorant. I’ll bow outEWF, I dont think my answer is funny - It was a very serious post!
and I find calling a poster "ignornat" as a poor way to describe someone on this board.
I apologize for referring to Van as ignorant. I’ll bow out
In post #24, Van called me a liar. Does that offend you
peace to you
For the record, we were having a civil discussion in this thread about whether truth matters to us until Van introduced his usual personal attacks.YEs it does -
but I do not monitor this 24 hours a day -
proper action - hit report - then we will deal with it.
EWF, I dont think my answer is funny - It was a very serious post!
and I find calling a poster "ignornat" as a poor way to describe someone on this board.
You are misquoting Cana, he did not use the word ignorant to describe anyone… rather he used ignorance… specially, your ignorance of scripture as a declarative statement The first can be construed as an insult, why the other can be taken to mean that one does not have enough of something to make the comment… two very different situations. My laughter merely reflects that recognition.EWF, I dont think my answer is funny - It was a very serious post!
and I find calling a poster "ignornat" as a poor way to describe someone on this board.