• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Donald Trump Is Proving Too Stupid to Be President

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I missed it. There is a lot I disagree with her on, but I have never heard her deny The Trinity.

At 2:30, Huch makes the statement that "Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God", and she agrees. The claim is made again and agreed to by her again at 2:38.

That expressly conflicts with John 3:16.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I know you will never admit your lies, but in your previous post you repeated several.

Trump is a horrible example of what a husband should be. Obama is a good example of a good husband and father.

You know about Trump's divorces and adulterous affairs ... right? How can that be a good example or in anyway Christ-like?

While the public has great interest in numerous matters concerning a potential President or sitting President, the legal requirement does not include anything regarding marriage, the lack of being married, affairs during marriage or the severance of a marriage.

Certainly questions may arise among the public at large, and feisty reporters that lead to implications and conspiracies on numerous matters; that fester into the intended result; of ie, a scandal (including things regarding marriage). However, the so call scandal only remains a scandal when it continues to be, or attempted to be; "covered up" or is "lied about under oath".

Trump's marriage matters, are not secret, not covered up, admitted, and resolved privately as marriage matters should be.
The same was true for Kennedy.
The same was NOT true for Clinton.
The same is true for Obama.
The same is true for Trump.

So while you think Trump's marriage matters are a concern for you; His marriage matters are of no legal concern regarding his Presidential service.

A legal matter that was and is of concern for some people is; Obama's time being seated in the People's National Office, and the specific known person who conspired with Obama for him to be positioned to sit in such Office.

Because the Legal requirement for a lawful sitting POTUS does include a specific type of citizenship that is void of foreign influence.

Trump meets the legal requirement for a person to be seated as POTUS.
Obama did not meet the legal requirement for a person to be seated as POTUS.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
At 2:30, Huch makes the statement that "Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God", and she agrees. The claim is made again and agreed to by her again at 2:38.

That expressly conflicts with John 3:16.

And?

Would you say she is ignorant of the understanding of what "begotten" means?
or
she is believing men can "become" sons of God?
or
something else?
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That salvation is by Christ alone (Romans 10:9-10) and cannot be bought with 'seed money', for a start.

Televangelist Paula White Hawks 'Resurrection Life' for $1,144 'Seed'

Longtime televangelist and senior Pastor of New Destiny Christian Center in Apopka, Florida, Paula White offered her followers an Easter Sunday deliverance from a spiritual death sentence for a $1,144 "resurrection seed" she says was set by God.

Preaching the story of Lazarus who Jesus resurrected from the dead in John 11:38-44, White promised believers in a video appeal that if they would sow the seed and have faith, she believed deliverance would come.

"I don't know what is dead. I don't know what the enemy sent a death to. I don't know what decision that caused death to come upon whatever the situation you're facing, but I do know that God has sent me to you to bring resurrection life. To tell you that I believe that as we put our faith together before Easter Sunday on March 27, there's gonna be resurrection life in your life," said White.


Televangelist Paula White Hawks 'Resurrection Life' for $1,144 'Seed'
That is a good answer.

HankD
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Happy, do you lack the ability to comprehend the topic at hand? Is your attention span defective? Why can't you stay on topic?

Let's look at a typical response by Happy.

Here was the question asked by crabtownboy:

You know about Trump's divorces and adulterous affairs ... right? How can that be a good example or in anyway Christ-like?

And here is Happy's response:

While the public has great interest in numerous matters concerning a potential President or sitting President, the legal requirement does not include anything regarding marriage, the lack of being married, affairs during marriage or the severance of a marriage.

So while you think Trump's marriage matters are a concern for you; His marriage matters are of no legal concern regarding his Presidential service.

A legal matter that was and is of concern for some people is; Obama's time being seated in the People's National Office, and the specific known person who conspired with Obama for him to be positioned to sit in such Office.

Because the Legal requirement for a lawful sitting POTUS does include a specific type of citizenship that is void of foreign influence.

Trump meets the legal requirement for a person to be seated as POTUS.
Obama did not meet the legal requirement for a person to be seated as POTUS.

See what I mean?


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, its me typing on a tiny key board. On top of that my phone has a need to auto correct everything I write for some reason.

I can imagine. Using a phone as a means to post comments is definitely not on my list of likes!

I am not a big fan of habitually tuning in to TV or particularly TV preaching. Which is not to say, I never have.
So, ya I have seen Paula White, and others preach on TV.

I would simply say, I think many people ARE attracted or distracted BY a Preachers "style" of Preaching, and at times that the "style" appears more important than paying close attention to the "script".

I see little difference in Paula's intent, from other Preachers, who use their own words to expound and capture the interest of the audience.

And every Preacher's "style" of delivery can be analyzed and accepted or rejected by the audience itself.
Jumping, shouting, pounding; IOW an over the top delivery (such as Paula, or a Rod Parsley) is extremely distracting IMO; as are People in the congregation who are talking, texting, whining, eating, etc.
Other Preachers who are monotone, feel-good, jokesters, story-tellers, entertainers, etc. bore me.

I completely understand, the intent of a Preacher to use their own words and develop a style of delivery;

However, personally I prefer taking advantage of having the text available to me, which I do, and having the advantage of having the supreme authority, Teacher of Scriptural Truth, Wisdom and Understanding, available to me 24-7, which I do, and daily exercise my right to take advantage of that opportunity provided to me VIA God Himself.

:)
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you have attention deficit problems? Why can't you stay on topic?

Subject matter is whether or not Paula White is heretical and here you are going off on a preacher's "style".

So, ya I have seen Paula White, and others preach on TV.

I would simply say, I think many people ARE attracted or distracted BY a Preachers "style" of Preaching, and at times that the "style" appears more important than paying close attention to the "script".

I see little difference in Paula's intent, from other Preachers, who use their own words to expound and capture the interest of the audience.

And every Preacher's "style" of delivery can be analyzed and accepted or rejected by the audience itself.
Jumping, shouting, pounding; IOW an over the top delivery (such as Paula, or a Rod Parsley) is extremely distracting IMO; as are People in the congregation who are talking, texting, whining, eating, etc.
Other Preachers who are monotone, feel-good, jokesters, story-tellers, entertainers, etc. bore me.

I completely understand, the intent of a Preacher to use their own words and develop a style of delivery;



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
At 2:30, Huch makes the statement that "Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God", and she agrees. The claim is made again and agreed to by her again at 2:38.

That expressly conflicts with John 3:16.
It does not deny The Trinity. It does not conflict with John 3:16 if you happen to know what she teaches and not just hear a sound byte.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Happy, do you lack the ability to comprehend the topic at hand? Is your attention span defective? Why can't you stay on topic?

Let's look at a typical response by Happy.

Here was the question asked by crabtownboy:



And here is Happy's response:



See what I mean?


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Do you lack the ability to comprehend the author of the OP himself deflected from the OP...?

Do you lack the ability to comprehend I gave one response to crabtownboy's post that had to do with marriage or dissolving a marriage....that YOU responded to with a "LIKE".

Secondly I responded to a post of ChirsTheSaved, in regard to Paula White and Pastors in general, from my perspective.

Perhaps you fail to comprehend when the OP author interjects a deflection from the OP, the OP becomes moot to a free-for-all discussion.

Perhaps you fail to comprehend when the OP is deflected from, and two posters are engaged in an exchange, of their own perspectives; YOU, the third wheel attempting to intrude and dictate the limit of the two posters, carries no baring or weight or necessary consideration.

IOW IF you do not like the conversation between two posters scroll on by, because your criticism is moot.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you lack the ability to comprehend the author of the OP himself deflected from the OP...?

Do you lack the ability to comprehend I gave one response to crabtownboy's post that had to do with marriage or dissolving a marriage....that YOU responded to with a "LIKE".

Secondly I responded to a post of ChirsTheSaved, in regard to Paula White and Pastors in general, from my perspective.

Perhaps you fail to comprehend when the OP author interjects a deflection from the OP, the OP becomes moot to a free-for-all discussion.

Perhaps you fail to comprehend when the OP is deflected from, and two posters are engaged in an exchange, of their own perspectives; YOU, the third wheel attempting to intrude and dictate the limit of the two posters, carries no baring or weight or necessary consideration.

IOW IF you do not like the conversation between two posters scroll on by, because your criticism is moot.

Wow, you totally schooled me.

<slinks away in shame>
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This entire thread is a joke.

Donald Trump may be many things, but stupid, he is not.
 
Top