Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What is your point?
So, I was curious as to the thinking of those who express that they are Scripturally free to consume intoxicants.
So, I was curious as to the thinking of those who express that they are Scripturally free to consume intoxicants.
It's also been shown that some personality types are more prone to gluttony and obesity. Because of this should we put sweets on the scripturally unacceptable list for all Christians too?I don't know if the folks on the forum are familiar that folks with attention deficit disorder have a high addictive rate because most have higher compulsive rates.
That is why so many of them fall into intoxicant abuse, and once that hold is in their life, find it nearly impossible to escape.
Who, here on the forum, considers it acceptable to drink wine or ingest some other intoxicant that is not prescribed by a doctor?
RESOLVED, That the messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention meeting in Greensboro, North Carolina, June 13-14, 2006, express our total opposition to the manufacturing, advertising, distributing, and consuming of alcoholic beverages; and be it further
RESOLVED, That we urge that no one be elected to serve as a trustee or member of any entity or committee of the Southern Baptist Convention that is a user of alcoholic beverages.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the messengers to the Georgia Baptist Convention meeting in Woodstock, Georgia, November 9-10, 2009, affirm our opposition to the consumption, manufacturing, and distribution of alcoholic beverages; and
. . . .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That we urge all Georgia Baptists to a life of total abstinence from the use of alcoholic beverages, so that we may cause no one to stumble (1 Cor.10:31-33), and so that we can remain worthy of imitation, as the Scripture commands in 1 Corinthians 11:1; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That we express appreciation to the leadership of the Georgia Baptist Convention for their commitment to nominate to places of service Godly individuals who abstain from the use of alcoholic beverages
Actually since you started the conversation why don't you show us where it is absolutely prohibited.
=agedman;1753616
Secondly, is that unless a person has "no hope" there is no other reason to give them "strong drink." Therefore, it is not appropriate to give it to yourself (if one is a believer) even in private - unless you have no hope in Christ.
A person has to come to terms with what is the purpose and meaning of the description in Scriptures of what wine and strong drink really are.
The Scripture puts them in the unique position of having human characteristics of mocking and raging. Both are not at all part of the character of Christ, but of the demonic world order. We are implored not to be deceived in this matter.
Secondly, is that unless a person has "no hope" there is no other reason to give them "strong drink." Therefore, it is not appropriate to give it to yourself (if one is a believer) even in private - unless you have no hope in Christ.
Thirdly, I have read that some consider that Christ both made and drank intoxicants. That just does not fit with his character and holiness. If one in fact takes the Scriptures literally in that "wine is a mocker and strong drink is raging" then Christ would not be the pure lamb of God having consumed something that was purposed to control him. Nor would he provide what He (being the very Word of God) considered deceitful.
Some would say, but the legal level of being intoxicated ... It doesn't matter. Even if one micro cellular level was impacted by drink, The Christ would be blemished. He was offered drink twice on the cross. The first time it was water, but the second the water contained an intoxicant. He drank the first, the second he spit out. He could not allow the diminished capacity and enticement to evil at any level of the pure service He performed for His Father. How much of an example that presents to the believer in this day!
Paul (possibly under Dr. Luke's instruction) told Timothy to take a bit of wine to settle the stomach. That is medicinal purpose.
The last argument resides with those who would state that when a person took a long journey to temple, they were permitted to drink.
There is medical reasoning that could be applied. However that verse also states that the person can do "whatever his soul desires." What if he desired something morally degrading? The point is quickly stated that other scriptures would hinder that thinking. My point, too, for the balance of Scriptures is against the consumption of a intoxicant with the noted exceptions.
Some would say, but the legal level of being intoxicated ... It doesn't matter. Even if one micro cellular level was impacted by drink, The Christ would be blemished. He was offered drink twice on the cross. The first time it was water, but the second the water contained an intoxicant. He drank the first, the second he spit out. He could not allow the diminished capacity and enticement to evil at any level of the pure service He performed for His Father. How much of an example that presents to the believer in this day!
If this were true, then if Christ ever got food poisoning, He couldn't have died for our sins, as his cells would have been altered by an outside source (just like alcohol does).Even if one micro cellular level was impacted by drink, The Christ would be blemished
What scripture are you referring to here?
Thirdly, I have read that some consider that Christ both made and drank intoxicants. That just does not fit with his character and holiness. If one in fact takes the Scriptures literally in that "wine is a mocker and strong drink is raging" then Christ would not be the pure lamb of God having consumed something that was purposed to control him. Nor would he provide what He (being the very Word of God) considered deceitful.
Some would say, but the legal level of being intoxicated ... It doesn't matter. Even if one micro cellular level was impacted by drink, The Christ would be blemished.
Secondly, is that unless a person has "no hope" there is no other reason to give them "strong drink."