• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Drinking Question......

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why does the Bible say to not even look on wine .... when it moves in the cup? Because when it's moving, you're drunk. Then it's time to put it away.

Know when to say when.

When is when?

When you're drunk!
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think that is a cop out for one and against the scriptures for another because we do have some informating in EPH., but let me ask do you think the Spirit of God has one standard or many in this area?

You asked: "If drinking is for the child of God at what point should he/she stop or put a limit on amount?"

I said that it is between the Holy Spirit and the person.

Now you say it's a cop out? Why? The Holy Spirit is not involved in a believer's life? Yes, we are told to watch ALL we do so that we don't cause another person to stumble but you know what? I've seen people stumble because of the happiness of others. Does that mean we should not be happy? I don't think so.

God gives us wisdom to use His gifts wisely. He has given us wine as a blessing but we must be wise in how we use that blessing. He has also given us prosperity as a blessing but we need to be wise in how we use that blessing as well.

But bottom line: The Bible does not give an across the board condemnation against the use of alcohol so we should not either.
 

Amy.G

New Member
You know when to say when...and if you don't, you have much bigger problems than consuming alcohol.

WD, I didn't learn when to say when until after the 1st time I got drunk. Up until then, I didn't have a clue how much was too much.

This was in my previous life.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
WD, I didn't learn when to say when until after the 1st time I got drunk. Up until then, I didn't have a clue how much was too much.

This was in my previous life.
...but there was a point you began to realize you were becoming "altered" (buzzed) so to speak. If you continue to drink beyond that point you have gone past "when". Nobody goes from sober immediately to drunk.
 

Amy.G

New Member
...but there was a point you began to realize you were becoming "altered" (buzzed) so to speak. If you continue to drink beyond that point you have gone past "when". Nobody goes from sober immediately to drunk.

Well yeah, but I was 21 yrs. old and didn't know that after the cool buzz I would be drunk until I was. It happens all the time when someone drinks for the first time. Or especially when young people go to parties and everybody's doing it. It sneaks up on you and the next thing you know you're puking. That's why we teach our youth to stay away from it. I'm sure you will teach your daughters the same thing, but don't be surprised if one them comes home late one night inebriated and says she didn't mean to get drunk.
 

freeatlast

New Member
I would suggest that we are not to allow anyone or anything to influence the total control that we are to allow the Lord to have except where medical treatment may need to sedate us or use certain drugs to help in a cure. Now with that we need to ask at what point does alcohol have influence in our lives?
I would point to this link for information http://www2.courtinfo.ca.gov:80/stopteendui/teens/facts/blood-alcohol-content.cfm
When scrolling down we see three links and they explain when alcohol starts to influence us. If we are not to be ingesting substances that influence us then there is no possible way to even have one glass of wine, one beer, or one drink without coming under some influence other then the Spirit of God.
It is impossible to discern individually on our own when the outside force of alcohol starts to influence us, but the scientific stats do give evidence that it is at the first drink.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Well yeah, but I was 21 yrs. old and didn't know that after the cool buzz I would be drunk until I was. It happens all the time when someone drinks for the first time. Or especially when young people go to parties and everybody's doing it. It sneaks up on you and the next thing you know you're puking. That's why we teach our youth to stay away from it. I'm sure you will teach your daughters the same thing, but don't be surprised if one them comes home late one night inebriated and says she didn't mean to get drunk.
I'm sure that will happen, but it won't be because she didn't know. I was always taught by my parents how evil alcohol was...but I want to instill the biblical view to my kids. They will know who it is for, what happens when you drink, when they should exercise judgement to stop, etc. We need more education on alcohol and less demonizing of it. Just "stay away" doesn't work, in fact with our sin nature it makes you want to do just the opposite (I speak from experience). "Let us reason together" is the correct approach, IMO.
 

Steadfast Fred

Active Member
...but there was a point you began to realize you were becoming "altered" (buzzed) so to speak. If you continue to drink beyond that point you have gone past "when". Nobody goes from sober immediately to drunk.
When one notices one is 'becoming altered (buzzed)', one is already drunk.

It appears your definition of drinking in moderation would have one drunk before one stops.
 

Steven2006

New Member
Well yeah, but I was 21 yrs. old and didn't know that after the cool buzz I would be drunk until I was. It happens all the time when someone drinks for the first time. Or especially when young people go to parties and everybody's doing it. It sneaks up on you and the next thing you know you're puking. That's why we teach our youth to stay away from it. I'm sure you will teach your daughters the same thing, but don't be surprised if one them comes home late one night inebriated and says she didn't mean to get drunk.

You make a good point. I think you could even say that anyone who drinks most likely has at some point been drunk. I really doubt you can find someone who drinks that could say they have never been drunk once.
 

Steadfast Fred

Active Member
I would suggest that we are not to allow anyone or anything to influence the total control that we are to allow the Lord to have except where medical treatment may need to sedate us or use certain drugs to help in a cure. Now with that we need to ask at what point does alcohol have influence in our lives?
I would point to this link for information http://www2.courtinfo.ca.gov:80/stopteendui/teens/facts/blood-alcohol-content.cfm
When scrolling down we see three links and they explain when alcohol starts to influence us. If we are not to be ingesting substances that influence us then there is no possible way to even have one glass of wine, one beer, or one drink without coming under some influence other then the Spirit of God.
It is impossible to discern individually on our own when the outside force of alcohol starts to influence us, but the scientific stats do give evidence that it is at the first drink.
Great link. Thanks.
 

Gwyneth

<img src=/gwyneth.gif>
I would say that my friends both in England and Germany would disagree with you. There is life in those countries. The Gospel is being preached and the name of God is being lifted up for His glory.

:thumbsup: Thankyou Ann :applause:

I was going to make some remarks in this thread, but think I may accuse some of being judgemental , so I`ll keep out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Dangers of Moderate Drinking

By John B. Gough​

John B. Gough (1817-1886) Born in Sandgate, Kent, England in 1817, Gough immigrated to the United States when he was only twelve years old. His mother and sister also came to America. His mother died of a stroke and Gough, despondent, began to drink. He married in 1838. The couple had a daughter but unfortunately, both mother and child died within days of each other. By the age of 25, Gough was unemployed, homeless, and a confirmed drunkard. In 1842 he attended a temperance meeting in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he took a pledge to totally abstain from liquor. He began to tell his story to eager audiences and soon embarked on a career of lecturing against the evils of drink. During his career, Gough delivered some 9,600 lectures to more than nine million people in America, Canada, England, Scotland, and Ireland.

When he died in 1886, the New York Times wrote that he "was probably better known in this country and in Great Britain than any other public speaker." Mr. Gough was one of this country's most influential social reformers who helped to solve one of America's most pressing problems. He was a witnessing Christian, a personal friend of Charles Spurgeon, and shared the pulpit in Boston (1877) during a "Temperance Day" meeting with D. L. Moody.

One favorite argument of young men in reference to the use of intoxicating drink is, "When I find out that it is doing me an injury, then I will give it up." That is making an admission and coming to a conclusion.

The admission is true; the conclusion is false. You admit it may injure you, and when it has injured you, then you will quit it. You won't use such an argument in reference to any other matter. "I will put my hand into the den of a rattlesnake, and when I find out that he has stuck his fangs into me I will draw it out and get it cured as quickly as possible." There is no common sense in that.

Young men, beware of this thing, because it is a snare. It is fearfully deceptive. Every man who drinks intends to be a moderate drinker. I have said this over and over again, because I believe it to be important. Every man who becomes intemperate does so by a course of argument from the beginning all the way down to ruin. Young men, you say, "When I find out that it is injuring me, then I will give it up." Is that sensible?

I once heard of a pilot who said he could pilot a vessel into Boston Harbor. "Now," said he to the captain, "I'll stand 'midships, and you can take the helm. I know every rock in this channel - every one of 'em - I know 'em all, and I'll give you warning." By and by the vessel struck upon a rock, and the shock threw everybody down upon the deck. The poor pilot got up, rubbing himself, and said, "Captain, there's one of 'em."

Now we say to young men, "There 's one of them. Hard up your helm before you strike!" That is sensible. If you have struck, haul off and repair damages, and then strike again. Is that sensible? In time the poor old battered hulk will not bear any more damages, and men will bury you, a broken wreck. That is the end of it in many cases. "When I find out that it is injuring me, then I will give it up." Gather all the drunkards of this country together, and ask them every one, "Are you drinking enough to injure you?" A large proportion will declare that they are not. Each one of them has become a drunkard in the sight of God and man before he has become one in his own estimation.

Intoxicating drink is deceptive in its very nature. It reminds me of the fable of the serpent in a circle of fire. A man was passing by, and the snake said to him, "Help me out of my difficulty." "If I do, you'll bite me." "Oh, no, I won't." "I'm afraid to trust you." "Help me out of the fire, or it will consume me, and I promise on my word of honor I won't bite you." The man took the snake out of the fire, and threw it on the ground. Instantly the serpent said, "Now I'll bite you." "But didn't you promise me you wouldn't?" "Yes, but don't you know it's my nature to bite, and I cannot help it." So it is with the drink. It is its nature to bite; it is its nature to deceive.

Young men say (and I have heard them more than once) that they "must sow their wild oats." Remember this, young gentlemen, "Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." If you sow corn, you reap corn. If you sow weeds, you reap weeds. If you sow to the flesh, you will of the flesh reap corruption. But if you sow to the spirit, you will of the spirit reap life everlasting. Ah, young men, look at that reaping, and then contemplate the awful reaping of men today who are reaping as they have sown, in bitterness of spirit and anguish of soul. "When I find out that it is injuring me, then I will give it up."

Surely that is not common sense. Such is the fascination thrown around a man by the power of this habit, that it must have essentially injured him before he will acknowledge the hurt and consent to give it up. Many a man has been struck down in his prosperity, has been sent to prison for crime, before he acknowledged that his evil habit was injuring him. I remember riding from Buffalo to Niagara Fails, and I said to a gentleman, "What river is that, sir?" "That," he said, "is Niagara River." "It is a beautiful stream," said I, "bright, smooth, and glassy; how far off are the rapids?" "Only a few miles," was the reply. "Is it possible that only a few miles from us we shall find the water in the turbulence which it must show when near the rapids?" "You will find it so, sir." And so I found it, and that first sight of Niagara Falls I shall never forget. Now, launch your bark on that river; the water is smooth, beautiful, and glassy. There is a ripple at the bow of your boat, and the silvery wake it leaves behind adds to your enjoyment. You set out on your pleasure excursion. Down the stream you glide; oars, sails, and helm in proper trim. Suddenly some one cries out from the bank, "Young men, ahoy!"

"What is it?"

"The rapids are below you."

"Ha, ha! We have heard of the rapids, but we are not such fools as to get into them. When we find we are going too fast, then we shall up with the helm and steer to the shore; we will set the mast in the socket, hoist the sail, and speed to land. Then on, boys, don't be alarmed, there's no danger." "Young men, ahoy there!" "What is it?" "The rapids are below you." "Ha, ha? We will laugh and, quaff; all things delight us. What care we for the future? No man ever saw it. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof. We will enjoy life while we may; we will catch pleasure as it flies. This is enjoyment, time enough to steer out of danger when we are sailing too swiftly with the current." "Young men, ahoy!" "What is it?" "Beware, beware! The rapids are below you." Now you feel them! See the water foaming all around! See how fast you pass that point! Up with the helm! Now turn! Pull hard; quick, quick! Pull for your lives! Pull till the blood starts from the nostrils and the veins stand like whipcord upon the brow. Set the mast in the socket, hoist the sail! Ah, ah, it is too late; faster and faster you near the awful cataract, and then, shrieking, cursing, howling, praying, over you go. Thousands launch their barks in smooth water and realize no danger till on the verge of ruin, boasting all the while to the last, "When I find out that it is injuring me, then I will give it up." The power of this habit, I repeat, is fascinating, is deceptive, and men may go on arguing and coming to conclusions while on the way down to destruction.

-Taken from Platform Echoes, John B. Gough. Pages 93-97, 1886.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
You make a good point. I think you could even say that anyone who drinks most likely has at some point been drunk. I really doubt you can find someone who drinks that could say they have never been drunk once.
Is that because alcohol is the sin, or the persons non control over it's consumption?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
When one notices one is 'becoming altered (buzzed)', one is already drunk.

It appears your definition of drinking in moderation would have one drunk before one stops.
Wrong. Being "buzzed" is not being drunk. When you are drunk you lose control of basic motor functions like speech, walking, etc. Using your logic the "caffeine high" you get from having a cup of coffee on an empty stomach or from having a couple cups is the same thing as being drunk.
 

Steven2006

New Member
Is that because alcohol is the sin, or the persons non control over it's consumption?

It is because of the person. However if you agree with the point, why would you support using something that one could argue 100% of the time will lead to sin, and the dangerous consequences that could come from a young person being drunk. Shouldn't the mature Christian advise against anything that realistically will bring about certain sin?
 

Steadfast Fred

Active Member
A 200 pound male, after 1 beer has a blood alcohol content of .02

At .02, intoxication is manifested in the following characteristics:
Reduced Awareness, Information Processing, and Visual Acuity
Stages of Intoxication

(BAC = 0.01 to 0.12 percent)
Increased Probability of Causing a Crash
0.06%−2X
0.08%−3X−4X
0.10%−6X
0.16%−35X
• More self-confident or daring
• Shortened attention span
• Overconfident
• Poor judgment—may say or do the first thing that comes to mind,
rather than an appropriate response or action for the given situation
• Unpredictable, impulsive, careless, distractive

Reduced Muscle Coordination (BAC = 0.09 to 0.25 percent)
• Loss of judgment
• They have trouble understanding or remembering things (even important events)
• Does not react to situations as quickly
• Body movements uncoordinated—small and large muscle coordination loss
• Poor balance
• Blurry vision, side vision impaired, loss of glare recovery
• May have trouble sensing things (hearing, tasting, feeling, seeing)
• Indecisive, unreasonable
-- http://www2.courtinfo.ca.gov/stopteendui/_pdf/stages_of_intoxication.pdf
one drink makes one drunk whether one thinks one is or not.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
A 200 pound male, after 1 beer has a blood alcohol content of .02

At .02, intoxication is manifested in the following characteristics:
one drink makes one drunk whether one thinks one is or not.
That says stages of intoxication, not being inebriated. Notice not until you were at .06 were you twice as likely to experience those on the list. Under that amount was normal behavior. Harldy "drunk" at .02.

Using this logic you are a glutton for eating one bite of a hamburger.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
It is because of the person. However if you agree with the point, why would you support using something that one could argue 100% of the time will lead to sin, and the dangerous consequences that could come from a young person being drunk. Shouldn't the mature Christian advise against anything that realistically will bring about certain sin?
I should have been more clear...I don't agree with that point.

Like I said to SFF, a person with a gluttony problem should not be encouraged to never eat again. Gluttony and drunkeness go hand in hand and are a heart problem, not a substance problem.
 

Steven2006

New Member
I should have been more clear...I don't agree with that point.

.

How many people do you know that regularly drink that can honestly say that they have never once been drunk? I have never met one in my entire life, yet I have met thousands of people that have or do drink.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top