37818
Well-Known Member
One has to have those literal words to begin with in order to that if needed."I must let the literal words go and . . .
Translation cannot be accurate without beginning the actual word of God, aka as literal.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
One has to have those literal words to begin with in order to that if needed."I must let the literal words go and . . .
Translation cannot be accurate without beginning the actual word of God, aka as literal.
The literal words are in the original languages --not English.One has to have those literal words to begin with in order to that if needed.
One still has to begin with God's words and know it's literal meaning and original usage to translate from God's word.The literal words are in the original languages --not English.
Translators are not able to translate words 'literally.' They have to translate them according to their meaning in context.One still has to begin with God's words and know it's literal meaning and original usage to translate from God's word.
Not always true. And in every case a translator must start with the original literal words.Translators are not able to translate words 'literally.' They have to translate them according to their meaning in context.
In addition to JJ's lack of proof regarding Existentialism in any modern English translation he has not demonstrated anything concerning neo orthodoxy in any Bible translation.Regarding post #100. JJ has yet to prove that existentialism is foundational in any Bible version of today. No mere assertion will do --only proof from the writings of present day translators and from the texts of English Bible translations.
Perhaps the quality of some Bibles are not very accurate. Perhaps they are way below the quality of what people have seen in other versions.In addition to JJ's lack of proof regarding Existentialism in any modern English translation he has not demonstrated anything concerning neo orthodoxy in any Bible translation.
It's funny. He cites Nida constantly, but can't document anything regarding all the evils supposedly out there in Bible translations.
His thesis has failed.