Why is that?
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Eight Democrat Presidential Hopefuls Who Plan to Come for Your Guns
- Thread starter kyredneck
- Start date
"
I would think you would know the posting rules.
I'm passing along a blog by my favorite Arminian, Roger Olson, who holds that a principle of debate should be "do not impute to others beliefs you regard as logically entailed by their beliefs but that they explicitly deny."
"There is no logical fallacy in saying that a person's belief logically entails a belief they do not hold. Logical fallacy only appears when it is said that because the person holds belief A he or she must also hold belief B which is explicitly denied."
A New Name for an Old Fallacy: "Assailment-by-Entailment"
There is a fine line here.
If someone suggested all democrats advocate abortion they would be wrong. Many are pro-life.
But members can ask how Democrats (one who supports the DNC either financially or by vote) reconcile supporting abortion when it is not in accord with their personal values.
The answer will probably be one of priorities. That is why I will never vote Democrat regardless of the candidate.
If someone suggested all democrats advocate abortion they would be wrong. Many are pro-life.
But members can ask how Democrats (one who supports the DNC either financially or by vote) reconcile supporting abortion when it is not in accord with their personal values.
The answer will probably be one of priorities. That is why I will never vote Democrat regardless of the candidate.
Yea, I have not broken any posting rules. Again if you support the party you support the platform. The platform of the DNC us unfettered abortion.
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath!!!!!!!!
Do U.S. Gun Deaths Since 1968 Outnumber Deaths in All American Wars?
FACT CHECK: Do U.S. Gun Deaths Since 1968 Outnumber Deaths in All American Wars?
Again for arguments sake let's say your post is true. Why do you think taking guns away from law abiding citizens will fix it.
The graphic was deaths "on battlefields".
obviously does not include holocaust, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Berlin firestorm, etc...
Abortion Causes 25% of All Deaths in United States, Guns Just 1.5% | LifeNews.com
Let’s see.....25% of deaths waged on the most innocent vs 1.5% gun deaths, which includes gang bangers taking each other out. What should we be more outraged about?!
Let’s see.....25% of deaths waged on the most innocent vs 1.5% gun deaths, which includes gang bangers taking each other out. What should we be more outraged about?!
Remember your statement this is is based on: "So-called "law abiding citizens" have killed more people in domestic (US) gun violence than have died in all of our wars." These numbers would assume, in the way you posted them to back you up, that those deaths are caused by "so-called 'law abiding citizens.'" It appears hard to find the numbers on how many of these are cleared by self-defense or "justifiable homicide," (including police shootings) and how many are done in gang violence, robberies and rapes to silence the victims, and just a desire to kill, as in the "shooting sprees."
And according to the New York Times (yukk), " When Americans think about deaths from guns, we tend to focus on homicides. But the problem of gun suicide is inescapable: More than 60 percent of people in this country who die from guns die by suicide" [ Gun Deaths Are Mostly Suicides]. Obviously there are many methods of suicide, but the gun-to-the-head is probably seen as the surest way. And suicide is technically illegal-- but survivors of suicide attempts are not sentenced to prison, but psychiatric treatment, if anything.
But all this does wipe out your contention that it is law-abiding citizens causing all the gun deaths, as you so obviously try to indicate.
