Nelson: Therefore, my assertion that the objects of the Father's drawing are believers is taken from verses 29,35,36,40,47,64; the whole chapter explicates symbolically that faith required of those whom God draws.
Hamilton: I will agree with you, Nelson, to the extent that, yes, those that are drawn by the Father, believe. And, yes, those drawn by the Father must believe. Repentance and faith are necessary components of conversion.
The issue is are repentance and faith items that man has the natural ability to do or must God enable him to perform them. I believe it is God that enables him and God cannot fail.
(1) The argument Jesus presents John 6 contemplates those who are believing (as you agreed)
in contrast to the religious audience in the narrative who refused to believe. It should be noted further that the faith assumed, without reference to individuals in particular, is the faith that continues to he end.
(2) John 12:32 (cf. 3:16) contemplates all men without exception and while the faith in the above verse assumes believers in particular, this verse respects the general influence the Cross will have on all men. Note His invitation to the audience in verses 35 and 36 (yet, also, note no such invitation seems to be made in chapter 6; cf. 6:36).
Note also verse 24 where Jesus symbolically states that His death will result in “much fruit.” Then, in verses 25-26 and 44-48, the subjects contemplated are between those who trust in Christ and those who do not.
Note also, in comparison with verse 24, is verse 32 where Jesus states that His being “lifted up,” a necessary event (which is the main point of this saying and men being drawn is a secondary consideration, cf. verses 33-34), which will result in all men being drawn to Him though not necessarily believing in Him, as again taken in context with verses 25-26 and 44-48.
Therefore, recognizing the subjects of chapter 6 in comparison to chapter 12, I conclude:
1. In John 12:37 (cf. vs. 44), contextually considered, “all” recognizes those who believe in Christ and by their continuance in faith are saved, in direct contrast with Jesus’ audience who are refusing to believe (vss. 53-58).
2. In John 6:32, contextually considered, “all” contemplates all men without exception who will be drawn to the Cross by virtue of God’s desire to save all men though not all men drawn will necessarily have faith, or if they obtain faith will continue in it, so as to be saved (vs. 44f).
3. In both cases, the idea that “those drawn by the Father
must believe” finds no support. In the first case it is because those who are contemplated are nowhere identified as believers in particular as individuals but believers in particular in general; and, in the second case, it is not believers in particular who are contemplated but all men in general as sinners being drawn towards the Cross event.
4. In both chapters, there is no admission of a natural inability in man to turn in faith to Christ, however, it is everywhere assumed that the act of believing in Christ is for man to do: “he who believes;” “he who eats this bread;” "He who loves his life…and he who hates his life;” “he must follow Me;” “believe in the Light;” “This is the work of God, that you believe;” etc. Therefore, the idea that man has no ability to believe in Christ has no support, at least, in these chapters.
5. Nowhere in either chapter is God’s enabling beyond giving opportunity, influencing or providing the means (whether within the individual or without) whereby salvation can be had and maintained, and there is no enabling apart from the individual’s cooperation: “Walk while you have the Light;” “While you have the Light, believe;” “if I am lifted up from the earth;” “work for the food…which endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you;” “it is My Father who gives you the true bread out of heaven;” etc. As such, the idea that faith is something God gives, and only to particular individuals because they have none of their own to exercise, has no support, at the least, in these chapters under discussion.
6. Just as Israel’s refusal to fulfill God’s purposes did not reflect any failure on God’s part, so the possibility that one may be drawn to Christ and yet refuse to believe does not reflect a failure on God’s part but a failure on man’s part (Rom. 9:6; 10:3-5).
I appreciate the time taken to read this extended response.