• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Equivocating Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism

Allan

Active Member
I still dont understand your commentary about 4 Point Calvinists in a Reformed Church. What reformed church....Dutch Reformed. I just visited with them & spoke to a pastor at a DRC & they stressed that inorder to be a Calvinist you MUST be a 5 pointer (or else the Doctrines of Grace cant work) Same as OPC Churches so Im wondering where you got that notion from. They wont even accept you into the church as a member unless your firing on all 5 Points. So, could you please advise?

Before there were Lutherians and Calvinists, there were was the Reformed views. It was the early way of showing a group of people who held to similar (though not specifically exact) views. Thus from Reformed theology you eventually had a divide of Lutherians (who are closer to Amyraldianism or 4 pointers) and Calvinists. Many of the early Reformers, who are noted as such (early Reformed Theologians), held to some differing views on Atonement (U and L), though all held to total depravity, scripture alone, God alone, Election, the call of God toward the sinner, justification by faith alone, perseverence/preservence of the Saints, as well as the rejection of the bodilly presense of Christ in the sacriments. Some definitions in the above might have some modification but for all intents and purposes they were much the same.

Thus Reformed Views, include Calvinism, but it was not historically understood as Calvinism, at least not initially. In fact, in is interesting to note that it was the Lutherians who first came up with the name Calvinists as a perjoritive. Another interesting factiod is that there is a theological view known as the Reformed Arminian view, which is much akin to Amyraldianism but with more emphasis on man's responsibility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Before there were Lutherians[sic] and Calvinists, there were was[sic] the Reformed views. It was the early way of showing a group of people who held to similar (though not specifically exact) views.

The Reformed view of theology = the Calvinist view. Calvinism could very well have been called Bucerism because Martin Bucer(1491-1551) held to the same things that his younger contemporary did.

Thus from Reformed theology you eventually had a divide of Lutherians[sic] (who are closer to Amyraldianism or 4 pointers) and Calvinists.

There was no divide within the Reformed camp which eventually led to Lutheranism. You have it backwards. Lutheranism came before Calvinism and were essentially two different forms of Protestanism.

Thus Reformed Views, include Calvinism, but it was not historically understood as Calvinism, at least not initially.

Reformed theology or the Reformed movement wasn't called Calvinism initially but the two terms are identifying the same entity.

In fact, in is interesting to note that it was the Lutherians [sic] who first came up with the name Calvinists as a perjoritive.[sic] Another interesting factiod [sic]is that there is a theological view known as the Reformed Arminian view, which is much akin to Amyraldianism but with more emphasis on man's responsibility.

Reformed Arminianism sounds oxymoronic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Edward63

Member
Good article by Thomas Ascol. It will be ignored by the offending party. John R. Rice got the ball rolling in that department and folks like David Cloud still propagate the same untruths.

Yes, and whatever possessed me to think I could return to such error and arrogance having left it so many years ago. I let myself hope that to the IFB, "fundamental" had gone back to mean fundamentals of Scripture as it once was, not vain traditions of men. I noticed when reading IFB posts it is about MEN: Rice, Jones, Hyles, Ryrie, Scofield, Cloud ...or certain Bible colleges: BJU, BBC, Temple, Moody, etc. Even the "thus saith the Lord" is distorted and twisted by the annotations of man at the bottom of the page of their study Bibles. Well, just one visit by an IFB Pastor and deacon(?), jarred me back to reality! I was so much seeking a church home, but I now see God must lead on that. I sure erred taking the lead. :D
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, and whatever possessed me to think I could return to such error and arrogance having left it so many years ago. I let myself hope that to the IFB, "fundamental" had gone back to mean fundamentals of Scripture as it once was, not vain traditions of men. I noticed when reading IFB posts it is about MEN: Rice, Jones, Hyles, Ryrie, Scofield, Cloud ...or certain Bible colleges: BJU, BBC, Temple, Moody, etc. Even the "thus saith the Lord" is distorted and twisted by the annotations of man at the bottom of the page of their study Bibles. Well, just one visit by an IFB Pastor and deacon(?), jarred me back to reality! I was so much seeking a church home, but I now see God must lead on that. I sure erred taking the lead. :D

Ed, I am sinserely sorry to hear your story....but it was far better that it was revealed sooner than later.

I myself have had my difficulties finding adequate churches to become a part if....so I keep myself open & Ive even considered the possibilities of starting one on my own. However I am finding more & more that the True Church of Jesus Christ is much more about me going out to people vs me going to a "Sunday Go To Meetin Facility." Now, I am not saying thats wrong, but perhaps God is calling you to much much more than what you have been previously used to. I urge you to pray about this....take it to Him.

God Bless
 

Edward63

Member
Ed, I am sinserely sorry to hear your story....but it was far better that it was revealed sooner than later.

God Bless

Very true... reminds me of what I told a young man recently concerning his fiancee. She up and left him and he was so broken-hearted. As you said, it is better to happen now than after he married and had children!
 
Top