1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

eschatology continued 2

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by prophecy70, Oct 7, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, that's what I said.
     
  2. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Clearly you still don't understand the point I was trying to make. Im sorry I can not use crayons and glitter to explain my threads on here. But alright, if you THINK you proved me wrong, ( I never made a statement to be proven right or wrong ) [​IMG]
    I was asking HIM to explain that verse. Not saying I only thought it meant the Big huge balls that are Stars today. I just picked one verse to see where he draws his conclusions on what is literal.
     
    #42 prophecy70, Oct 9, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Covenanter

    Covenanter Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    526
    Faith:
    Baptist
    NO!!! What John wrote was:
    "1. You are thinking in English. Hebrew grammar is quite different. If you have e-Sword, download the K&D commentary, which deals with the Hebrew in this passage."

    No. That was what John wrote.

    What YOU said/wrote was:
    "What he suggested was that you (the collective "you") read the passage in Hebrew rather than English and recommended K&D as the leading Hebrew experts to be your guild as you read the passage in Hebrew."

    He didn't suggest we read the passage in Hebrew, but that we download (obviously to read in English) the commentary "which deals with the Hebrew in this passage."
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Oh I get Tcass, you thought he wanted me to learn Hebrew over the weekend and then download Daniel in Hebrew and read it. That is a honest mistake, I can see how you came to that conclusion.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  5. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you could think about what it says without reading it?

    Your petty nitpicking just shows that you have lost the argument but are having trouble admitting it.
     
  6. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, Wrong again. He directed you to K&D, expert on Hebrew language, grammar, and syntax, to help you see how the Hebrew clarifies the issue.

    So, I will thank you to not be less than honest when making claims about what I said, thought, or wrote, Shame on you.
     
  7. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I understand it quite well.

    You really don't want to mock me. Really.

    Oh, but you did. Here is what you said:
    And that statement has been proven false. You can deny it and dance around it all day, but you have been proven to have made a false statement.

    So you said something (see above) you didn't really mean? I think there is a word for that.
     
  8. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    A star is a luminous ball of gas, mostly hydrogen and helium, held together by its own gravity. Nuclear fusion reactions in its core support the star against gravity and produce photons and heat, as well as small amounts of heavier elements.

    The word star can mean any heavenly body. It can also mean people and many different things. But I was talking about an actual star.

    So literally, an asteroid is not a literal star. If we have to keep being literal here.

    But that wasn't my point anyways.


    My whole point of what I said to robycop3 was

    sar·casm
    ˈsärˌkazəm/
    noun
    1. the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
      "his voice, hardened by sarcasm, could not hide his resentment"
      synonyms: derision, mockery, ridicule, scorn, sneering, scoffing;
    I was being sarcastically being LITERAL about what a star is.

    Did I actually think he thought actual stars, "you know the big sun things" could fall to earth? He's more educated than that. But other then that, if you know more about what I said then I did then more power to you. Not making this whole topic an argument because of assumptions.
     
    #48 prophecy70, Oct 9, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
  9. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He believes that heavenly objects can, have, and will, fall to earth. You don't like that? Too bad. Get over it.
     
  10. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Yeah I was sarcastically taking it literal as real stars. As a "literal" joke. I hope he doesn't believe actual stars will fall. Anyways Moving on.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Shooting star" or "falling star" have been terms for meteors since time immemorial! It's still used today, even though almost all people older than toddlers know what they are. And Jesus certainlt did. However, He was prophesying a coming event, not teaching astronomy.

    Your silly attempt to discourage LITERALLY believing Jesus' prophecies falls flat on its snoot.
     
  12. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    OK, have you SEEN any fulfillment of the events we've been discussing?
     
  13. David Kent

    David Kent Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2017
    Messages:
    2,374
    Likes Received:
    312
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not stars, not asteroids, not meteors, not meteorites.
    • 20 The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The two subjects are interlinked.
     
  15. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So, people are gonna fall from the sky?

    I thought it only rained cats & dogs!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Symbolism, FULLY EXPLAINED!

    I've never said there's no symbolism at all in Scripture. so no need to waste commentary about that.

    But I HAVE said, & will continue to say, that most Scriptural symbolism is explained in other Scriptures, or its meaning is discerned by our hindsight and overview of ALL Scripture. Remember, God said KNOWLEDGE WILL INCREASE, especially in the "end-times", and that necessarily includes our knowledge of HIM. Here's a few "ferinstances" - Jesus' audience, including even His disciples, didn't understand His saying one had to eat His flesh & drink His blood to be saved, but WE know what He meant. And the people of His time/place on earth didn't know what "falling stars" are, or, for that matter, what stars actually are, and that the sun is a star.

    There's NO indication that Jesus' Olivet Discourse prophecies are a bit symbolic. The ones that HAVE already cometa pass, such as the destruction of J & the temple, have been fulfilled LITERALLY, TO THE LETTER, & there's simply NO legitimate reason to not expect the rest to be fulfilled just-as-literally and exactly.
     
  17. Covenanter

    Covenanter Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    526
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I, & others, took John's advice & read the K&D reference. I can't read Hebrew, but I can understand the English they used to explain the Hebrew - as John recommended.

    We even accept the conclusion that K&D reach; a conclusion that supports what a simple reading of the English leads to -
    the 70 weeks represent 490 continuous years;
    the first 7 weeks cover the rebuilding after the return from Babylon;
    the 62nd week (69th) leads to the baptism & anointing of Jesus;
    the 70th week covers the 3 1/2 years of Jesus earthly ministry up to his crucifixion, & continues through the Apostolic ministry & concludes with the official stoning of Stephen;
    Messiah confirms the covenant during the 70th week with those who believed his earthly ministry & then with those who believed the Apostolic ministry;
    the covenant does not end after 7 years, but runs on as the new covenant;
    the rejection of the Messiah is the reason for the AD 70 destruction of city & sanctuary;
    separation of the 70th week from the 69 is a violation of the text.



     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  18. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    matthew 24 is about the destruction of the temple, it was fulfilled in ad 70 correct. That generation didn't pass away until it happened, TO THE LETTER. Correct ;)
     
  19. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Matthew 16:28 Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."

    Was fulfilled to, some of them didn't die until the after the destruction.
     
  20. prophecy70

    prophecy70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    148
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I hope he wasn't alive in AD 70, what kind of question is that?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...