• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Eternal Security

Briguy

<img src =/briguy.gif>
Ed, Hope you are well!
I have no time to discuss any of your answers to Ruht and I apologise for that. It seems you are both seeing things with different eyes and different doctrine in place that you are trying to prove. I let scripture provide doctrine where it seems you and some others use it to prove doctrine. I hope and pray you see the difference there. In regards to "doing good" please understand that the concept is that "doing good" in God's eyes can only happen from a person washed clean by the blood. The "doing good" is an outward proof to others of the inward salvation of the soul that has occured. There is no proof of salvation beyond what others see, James and Paul both understood this very well. Peace to you.

In Christ,
Brian

P.S. I just received word that my friend Gary(from my last post) took a turn for the worse -- Please pray

[ August 28, 2002, 10:52 AM: Message edited by: Briguy ]
 

ONENESS

New Member
Ruht, I have a couple questions.

What do you think of the Holy Spirit? Must one have the Holy Spirit to be saved?

Must one Repent to be saved?

Must one believe to be saved?

Christ died on the cross for us but we have to accept his gift. How do we accept it? Is it just a mental knowledge of believing that God died for us?

And last I know that you know God there is no doubt about that, but does God know you? I’m sure all of us know the President, but does know each one of us? There are certain things that God has asked us to do in his word, and if we do no obey what he as asked us to do than we do not get to heaven. Even after you are "Saved".
 

ONENESS

New Member
A person must receive Christ into his heart, in order to be saved. For whosoever hath not the Spirit of God, is none of his (Romans 8:9).
Ruht, Well I am glad to see that you believe that Jesus, the Holy Spirit and the Father are the Same person ;)

But you did misquote Romans 8:9

It should have read "Spirit of Christ"

BTW, what is Ruht? Is that kind of like "RUT" b/c thats where you are at bro. LOL, just kidding.

God bless

[ August 28, 2002, 12:03 PM: Message edited by: ONENESS ]
 

Eladar

New Member
Brian,

I am sorry to hear that Gary is sick, but I'm glad to hear the effect the sickness has had in his life.

According to Jesus, the soil doesn't change. Each of us is born with the heart that we have. From what you said, it doesn't sound like your friend rejected Jesus, therefore I don't believe the seed was killed. Rocky soiled hearts reject Jesus under persecution. Weed hearts reject God because of the concerns of this world. If anything it sounds like Gary fits this situation (as do a great many American Christians).

Ruht,

It was not "rocky soil," it was a "rock," just as Christ said it was, in Luke 8:6&13, KJV.
Try reading Matthew 13:5-6 KJV

Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

Is it that Matthew who is wrong, or is it you who is wrong?

Yes, it fell upon stony places, meaning upon stones. There is no deepness of earth upon stones.
Matthew says "where they had not much earth". Notice Matthew doesn't say "where there was no earth". The seed was rooted in the soil of the heart.

Once again I ask, is Matthew right or are you right?

Luke is the sharper version of the parable, at least in regard to this; although they both have value and are in the Bible for a reason.

I'm sorry, but you are simply in error.
Here is how Jesus interpreted the parable:

Matthew 13:20-23

But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful. But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

According to Jesus, those who are represented by the rocky soil receive it in exactly the same way as those who are good soil. The only ones in which the seed does not grow is represented by the path.
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"I didn't proclaim anyone is of the devil. Apparently you are as bad as interpreting my words as you are the Lord's."

"Copied from this thread, YOUR ANSWER to another with whom YOU disagree:

Your misinterpretations, inspired by Satan, are not the Bible.

We will wait for yer apology."
Then you'll be waiting a long time, for "inspired" by Satan is not the same as being "of" Satan.

Apparently your inability to be able to rightly divide my sharp words is not unlike your inability to divide the Lord's sharp words.

"It's Ruht. When addressing the name of a person, proper grammar requires the capitalization of the first letter of the name."

"Sorry. Somewhere I saw it with all small letters and my brain followed that."
Glad you edited what you said previously, for you claimed it was written that way at the start of this thread.

"There is nothing "run of the mill" about grace."

"I know. Hope you find some somewhere. So far your posts have been distinctly lacking of it."
I have "found" it, and I indeed preach it, which is the true reason you find fault with me.

"Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation."
"OK. Those who have done good are those who were saved by faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, and thus, born of the Holy Spirit."

"Says NO SUCH THING. Go back and read the verse again. The word "faith" is not in there at all. You are acting now like Luther who was intemperate enough to add words to the Scriptures to suit his particular theological bent. It says "those who have done good". Period."
Line must be upon line, my friend, and precept upon precept, here a little and there a little, and indeed, it says such a thing. And if "Luther" also said it, then Luther was right.

You should then listen to Luther.

A person does not "do good" by trying to justify himself through attempted obedience to written commandments. A person only does good by faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ.

I ask you, legalist: Does that say a person does good by attempted obedience to written commandments?

The Lord taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

"Ro 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:"
"OK. St Paul was referring to the deeds of either accepting salvation through the shed blood of Jesus Christ, or not accepting it. And "well doing" are those who have had faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, not in the attempted obedience to written commandments."

"Doesn't say that either."
Line must be upon line, my friend, and precept upon precept. The only way a person is justified is through faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, not by his own efforts of righteousness. The Bible indeed says this, but you are failing to apply it. You are forgetting what manner of man you are - saved by grace, not by works - and because of this you are stumbling at scripture.

If I told you "the cat is green, it will always be green, and it will never be anything else," and then I told you "the feline is blue," would you abandon what I said previously about the cat always and only being green, or would you remain upon such a sure foundation, without wavering, and realize that the cat is still green, and there must be some other interpretation of "the feline is blue."

This is what you are doing with the Bible, and God wrote the Bible this way intentionally to "snare" people like you. For your true faith is revealed by this, as you forsake Christ to accept righteousness through attempted obedience to written law, when you read verses which sound as if they agree with your own self-righteousness. But those who have true faith in Christ will not waver, and they will not be fooled by that which "sounds" like it is saying something else, for they know that man is only justified by what Christ did, not by what man does, and they know that will never change, and will always be.

This is the SURE FOUNDATION referred to in Isaiah 28 and other places. I pray you learn of it.

You have forgotten what manner of man you are, as testified to in James 1, and you therefore are fooled by such scriptures.

"In fact, the whole of Romans 2: 5 - 10, which describes the Last Judgement, says NOTHING regarding faith.
It says it all throughout the Bible, you need to remain upon the sure foundation while interpreting scripture.

"It says that those who have sought eternal life through the perseverence in good deeds shall indeed receive it."
And "good deeds" are not things done to try and earn salvation, good deeds begin with faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, and continue by nature through the birth of the Holy Spirit.

Again, you have failed to apply line upon line, and precept upon precept.

"And those who have done evil shall receive for their evil deeds. You really should read the Scriptures the way they are written and not how you want them to read."
Yes, you should.

"This is why Christ gave the world the Catholic Church as the "pillar and foundation of truth" (1 Tim 3:15), because there are THOUSANDS of little "popettes" like you in pulpits all across the world who are all too willing to bend, twist, and distort the clear wording of Scripture to fit their understandings and culturalisms."
The legalism in the Catholic church was not given by Christ, and my words and knowledge of grace are from the Holy Spirit.

"14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory."

Explain what it means that the Holy Spirit is the earnest of our inheritance."
"Perhaps this might help your confusion:

"Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also HATH given unto us the earnest of the Spirit." - II Corinthians 5:5

"Earnest" means, in this sense: "something given as an indication or assurance of what is to come; token." (Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition Copyright 1999)"

"You should stop to read what you copy."
You should stop to understand what you read.

"A token of something which is to come is NOT the same as the full amount. It is a pledge. The Holy Spirit is the foretaste of Heaven and eternal life. But we get the full amount after we have been judged and if we have been found faithful covenant keepers."
The "token" of the Holy Spirit is not a "taste" of eternal life, as we have full eternal life, now. (John 5:24; John 6:47; John 6:54; John 10:28; I John 5:11; I John 5:13) And this "token" is not a "pledge," but an assurance.

"Christ was telling the person that all of his own works of self righteousness were still not good enough, that the only way he could ever be saved was through faith in Christ, not through the attempted obedience of the written laws this person had tried to boast he had kept."

"That again, is NOT what Jesus said.
That is exactly what Jesus said. However, your legalistic veil over your eyes keeps you from seeing it.

"You really need to imagine yourself as a Jew standing there listening to what Jesus was saying. Jesus said that we are to keep God's commandments. That is what anyone listening would have understood.
That is what a self-righteous legalist like yourself would have understood, which is why you, along with the person Christ was speaking to, stumble and turn from his grace

"Is Jesus a deciever who says one thing but secretly means another?"
Jesus is not the deceiver, your own heart is. Jesus just spoke in a way that those who refused to believe in him, could not hear, and he said so:

"Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand." - Luke 8:10

"And he said, Go and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed." - Isaiah 6:9&19

"But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath REVEALED them unto us BY HIS SPIRIT: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. - I Corinthians 2:7-10

You cannot understand the words of Christ because your eyes, ears and heart are not capable of understanding his words. Only through the revelations of the Holy Spirit will you ever be able to understand the Lord.

"No, He told Caiphas that He had preached plainly and in the open His doctrines. You need to stop twisting His words to suit you and then accusing all who take His words literally of being "legalists"."
They are plain; however, the natural man cannot hear the plain words of Christ:

"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are SPIRITUALLY DISCERNED." - I Corinthians 2:14

They are "plain" to me, why are they not "plain" to you?

I do not "twist" the plain words of God, rather you do, as do all legalists.

"Christ told him to "sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor," as a witness against the self-righteousness of this person, and his dishonesty. For this person was proven not to be nearly as self-righteous as he exalted himself, for he was not able to sell everything he had, in his self-righteousness, thus demonstrating all of his attempted obedience to written law was not done in sincerity from within. Christ exposed his real heart, that he was only righteous on the outside."

"Indeed. The young man, for all his good deeds, had an idol which needed to be smashed. Christ pointed this out to him. Incidentally, there is an interesting tradition which says that this young man might have been St. Paul. Knowing the caliber of St. Paul's life as outline in Scripture, this is possible."
Actually, this "young man" had boasted openly before Christ, his disciples, God and man that he had kept the law, thus asserting that he was righteous. Christ, who is God, knew he had not kept the law, and as a witness in front of the others, proved the unrighteous heart of this individual by letting them all see that he was not as good as he espoused. Christ proved the shortcomings of the written law, how that the righteousness in the written law was still not good enough. Christ proved that this person was self-righteous, not truly seeking the righteousness of Christ, when giving the man something he could not give up. The man therefore left Christ, satisfied with his own righteousness, because he did not truly believe in Christ.

Christ was not saying that someone has to sell everything they have and give to the poor in order to have eternal life, he was proving the heart of this individual, in how it was not nearly as righteous and obedient to God as he espoused in the law. The only way he could have been saved was by "following Christ," which means being saved and born again of the Holy Spirit. This was the only way Christ was telling this man he could be saved.

"1Co 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which ye are.

Explain how if your "once saved - always saved" doctrine is true that St. Paul could make the above statement to believers."
"How can the temple defile the temple? And how can God living inside of the temple, the Holy Spirit in saved man, defile the temple?

You are defiling the temple of God if you claim the saved body of a person is not yet good enough."

"Is anyone else confused by this answer? This makes no sense at all to me."
I'm sure it doesn't.

"1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain."
"If you keep in memory what Paul preached, then you have accepted it, and have become saved. "Believed in vain" means having misunderstood the words of Paul, and thus having thought that salvation came through attempted obedience to written commandments."

"You miss my point. With the "once saved - always saved crowd" there is no "if"."
False. There is an "if" if you have not yet accepted Christ; which is where you are stumbling.

"For St. Paul to use the word "if" in the same sentence as salvation creates the scenario that our salvation has an "if" to it."
Salvation does have an "if' to it, and the "if' means "if" you are saved or not, not "if" you stay saved or not.

"Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:

23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;

Explain again why St. Paul would state that Christ would present believers holy and unblameable in his sight only IF they continued in the faith."
Because Paul is speaking of the mind of the believer, in which he would present you "holy and unblameable and unreprovable in his sight."

As I believe I said before, you failed to quote the important verse before that:

And you, that were sometime alienated in your mind by wicked works, yet know hath he reconciled. - Colossians 1:21

If one was "alienated" in one's MIND, and this passage speaks of a "reconciliation" of that alienation, then where is the author referring to as to where the reconciliation is taking place?

Here's a hint: The same place where one was "alienated" in, the MIND.

Therefore the author is saying that if one holds fast in faith that which he has taught about grace, in their MINDS, then in their MINDS the Holy Spirit would present them "holy and umblameable and unreprovable in his sight," just as what is going on between you and me. I know that I am saved and not under any condemnation, because I stand firm in faith on the sure foundation. You, however, have forgotten what manner of man you are - saved by grace, not by works - and you therefore are at unrest in your mind in regard to your relationship and standing with God.

You see, in your fear and doubt of your salvation, all you therefore see when you read that passage and passages like that are words like "if" and things like that. But the person who stands firm on the sure foundation of grace, who does not interpret scripture in haste, but waits upon the Lord for HIS interpretation, God then directs them to noticing things that the legalist passes by.

For the doers of the perfect law of liberty are truly blessed in their deeds, just as James 1:25 says they are.

God wrote the Bible this way intentionally.

"If" you accept the gospel, and do not turn away from it, you are saved. "If" you turn away from it, you are not saved."

"No such concept is found in Scripture anywhere."
It is all throughout the Bible, and here is one easy place for starters:

"He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." - John 3:18

I am sorry you are not able to see this.

"This idea sprung out of the Protestant Rebellion and their attempts to reconcile Luther and Calvin's teachings of "perseverence" of the saints with the Biblical teaching that a believer may indeed fall away."
There is no teaching anywhere in the Bible that a believer can fall away.

And the Protestants were wise to come out from under the Satanic yoke of the Catholic church which was erroneously espousing such a thing. Legalists have been in the "church" since the beginning of time, and they even killed Christ and the prophets. And the legalistic Catholic hierarchy I'm sure killed as many prophets as they could get away with, also. All one has to do is look towards their bloody history, including their Crusades and Inquisitions.

Satan has disguised himself as an angel of light for quite awhile, and the most evil men who ever lived are unsaved legalists, which is why Christ said they would receive the greater damnation.

Has there been good done in the Catholic church? yes, there are indeed genuine Christians in the Catholic church; although I am sure tormented somewhat by the legalism shoved down their infant throats by vipers in tall, pointy hats, robes and long, pointing fingers.

Praise God for the Protestant reformation.

"St. Paul is writing to believers here and warning them to continue in the faith. Your interpretation is a man made idea which is not found in the verse above."
Says a blind legalist.

"An eternal covenant made by God cannot be broken by God, for it is impossible for God to lie. Only man is capable of breaking such a covenant between God and man; unsaved man, that is."

"The eternal covenant is between the members of the Trinity. They exist in perfect and unbreakable covenant with one another. As for the relationship between God and man, it is a covenant and if you study Deut. 28, you will see the outline of how covenants work. One of the principles of a covenant is that they are breakable."
It is an eternal covenant with man, legalist, and God says it is:

"But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts, and will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will REMEMBER THEIR SIN NO MORE." - Jeremiah 31:33-34

"This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them; And their sins and iniquities I will REMEMBER NO MORE. Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin." - Hebrews 10:16-18

"For by one offering he hath PERFECTED FOREVER them that are sanctified." - Hebrews 10:14

And "REMEMBER NO MORE" and "FOREVER" means ETERNAL.

"I would suggest you read Ray Sutton's book on the covenant THAT YOU MAY PROSPER, in order to come to an understanding of what a covenant is and how one works."
I suggest Ray Sutton come into this forum and read what I have written.

God bless.

[ August 28, 2002, 12:48 PM: Message edited by: Ruht ]
 

Eladar

New Member
Your misinterpretations, inspired by Satan, are not the Bible.

Nor are they an "authority."

The devil goeth about as a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.

God bless.
I believe this is where you said I was of the devil.
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"Some further thoughts for Ruht:

Just had a customer cancel an appointment, so I have a few hours to kill. I would like to approach your initial thread another way.

Our Lord said at the Last Passover/First Eucharist:

"This is the New Covenant IN MY BLOOD..."

The word "covenant" appears over 280 times between the Old and New Testament. Therefore, since it not only appears so much, but because Christ established the New Covenant in the Blood He shed upon the Cross, it is a very important concept for us to consider as believers."
The "new covenant" was actually the older of the two. For man has always been only saved by grace.

"A covenant happens when two people come into union. The best definition of a covenant here on earth would be that which the Bible gives -- marriage. We are called "The Bride of Christ" for this reason. We enter into a profoundly intimate relationship with the Lord in our salvation. It is compared to marriage.

In a marriage, there are oaths made between the parties with sanctions that happen if the oaths are broken. The wife promises to obey the husband. The husband promises to love the wife. (Eph. 5). By the doing of these things, the relationship grows and matures. The two become ever closer in their relationship."
There is no "broken oath" in this covenant, for there is no divorce.

"Now how does one accomplish these things? Does the wife practice submission by sitting around and thinking nice thoughts about her husband? Or does she DO those things that the husband instructs her in? For instance, a wife who has been instructed to wash the clothes, pay the bills, and have dinner on the table at 6:30 sharp, yet who does not do these things, has NOT practiced submission. She can think all the nice things about her husband, and even say them on the phone to her girlfriends, but in ACTIONS AND DEEDS, she has failed to submit to him."
A man does not have the right to divorce his wife because she won't "submit" unto him.

However, the saved are always in submission to God, as the Holy Spirit is stronger than their own will.

"This is similar to the Christian who sits around in his state of "faith alone" Christianity and never DOES what the divine Bridegroom instructed us to do."
The truly saved always do what the bridegroom instructs them to do. For the Holy Spirit is stronger than their own will. (Romans 6:16-22; Philippians 2:13)

Have you not read:

"A new heart also will I give to you, and a new spirit will put within you: and I will take the stony heart out of your flesh, and give you an heart of flesh. And I will put my spirit within you, and CAUSE you to walk in my statutes, and ye SHALL keep my judgments, and DO THEM." - Ezekiel 36:26&27

Doesn't sound to me like the bride has much of a "free will" choice now, does "she."

The Lord taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

"Our good deeds do not earn us salvation -- we are already in the love relationship by virtue of making covenant with God through Christ. Our good deeds are the means by which we keep covenant with the one we are married to. And they show our heart for Him, do they not?"
Our truly good deeds come forth by nature, through the birth of the Holy Spirit, not through the efforts of the flesh.

Tell me this, legalist, how were these Gentiles able to keep the things contained in the law, when they had never even had nor seen the law before, in their lives:

"For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by NATURE the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law WRITTEN IN THEIR HEARTS, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the meanwhile accusing or else excusing one another;..." - Romans 2:14&15

What say you, legalist, how were these Gentiles able to keep the law when they never had ever even seen the law before?

It's highlighted in bold, CAPITAL letters for you to see how.

"Now what will happen to the wife who does not submit to her husband? Will they grow closer or will there be tension? What will happen if this continues year after year after year? Will there be a real "one flesh" relationship in their marriage? I think you know the answer."
Oh, I know the answer; pay attention and you will learn it.

"And ultimately, there may well be a divorce. A severing of that relationship."
There is no divorce from Christ, for the putting away of the wife is a sin, and Christ said so.

And the bride of Christ is the entire church, not each individual. We are not all individual "wives" of the Lord, the church collectively is the bride of Christ. This would then mean Christ would have to divorce the entire church. The Bible mentions nowhere of the "brides" of Christ, but rather the BRIDE of Christ.

You apparently do greatly err.

"This is what happens when a believer does not submit to the divine Bridegroom.
You haven't a clue as to what you are talking about.

"Salvation is union with Christ."
Salvation is salvation, it is not probation.

"It is relationship which is supposed to grow ever deeper and more intimate. But if we do not do the will of our divine Bridegroom, we sever ourselves from His life and from being "one flesh" with Him."
One does not do the "will" of God by trying to justify one's self through attempted obedience to written commandments.

"And if this continues without repentance, if we constantly "break the covenant" with Him by deeds of rebellion (sin), then in the Judgement Day, He will divorce us eternally. That is the sanction of the broken oath. Study Deut. 28 closely. There are blessings for covenant keepers and cursings for covenant breakers."
You haven't a clue as to what you are talking about. We are not saved by attempted obedience to written commandments, and therefore we are not judged for failing to keep written commandments. We are only saved by faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, and we are only saved ONCE. For we receive eternal life the moment we are saved, and eternal life IS eternal life.

I ask you, foolish legalist: Do you believe in eternal damnation? I'm sure you do, as fear is what motivates the legalist, not faith. Therefore if one receives eternal damnation, can they come out of eternal damnation? And if you say no, then why do you not think eternal life is just as eternal as eternal damnation?

Christ has said we HAVE eternal life the moment we belief, have you not read my posts? Are you now going to argue that eternal life is not as eternal as eternal damnation?

There is apparently no limit to the ends a legalist will go to, to deny Christ.

"This is not legalism, despite what you say."
It is pure legalism, despite what YOU say.

"Legalism is trying to make the covenant with God by our own works and ignoring Christ. It is the Hindu who "baptizes" himself in the Ganges River every year to try to wash away his sins. He is trying to get to God without Christ. That is legalism."
Keep telling yourself that, legalist, if that comforts you somewhat. But then tell me how the Pharisees and others in the Jewish religiosity who never even knew anything "Hindu" could have then been legalists.

I ask you, legalist, did not the Pharisees have the scriptures which stated the coming of the Messiah? Why then did they not recognize the Messiah when he stood right in front of their faces?

Because he did not preach written commandments as the way to justification, that's why. Which was a motive of theirs behind them killing him.

Now, even though they believed in a Messiah, was that enough to save them? Did they trust in the Messiah for their salvation, or did they trust in their own efforts through attempted obedience to written law?

The Bible says it was the latter. (Romans 9:30-33)

So what makes you any different than they? You have heard the name Jesus, that there is a Messiah, but do you trust in this Jesus for your salvation, or do you also trust in your attempted obedience to written commandments?

Why should the Pharisees not escape hell, but you should, when you both appear to believe the same thing?

Believing in Christ means having faith in what he did on the cross. It means trusting in his redemptive deed for your salvation, faith in his blood, not in your own works of righteousness. How can you say you believe in Christ as such, if your works prove your faith is in works, not in Christ?

You show me your faith in works by trying to be righteous through attempted obedience to written laws; I'll show you my faith in Christ by me being at REST in what he has done for me on the cross.

My works show my faith in Christ; your works show your faith in works. And therefore you have just been revealed the mystery of James 2:17-26.

I hope and pray you are listening.

"Christ has established the New Covenant with God in His own Blood. The New Covenant is permanent because the Blood of Christ cannot fail. But that permanent covenant is between Christ and God. We enter into Christ by baptism (Rom. 6:3; Gal. 3:27) and sharing in Him, we become part of that covenant. But if we break our covenant with Christ, if we leave Him, then we can no longer be partakers of the eternal covenant between Christ and God."
And how do you say we can ever leave eternal life? Can those in hell ever leave eternal damnation?

You do not know what you are talking about.

"Our works are what "keeps covenant" with Christ."
Our "works" keep nothing with Christ. His faithfulness is what keeps covenant with US.

Your such works are in vain. (Galatians 3:1-4)

"We do what the divine Bridegroom instructs us to do and thus doing, we both show our love and share in His love for us."
We do what the Holy Spirit leads us to do, and we do it by nature, not by written commandment. For the letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life. (II Corinthians 3:6)

God bless.
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"Ruht, I have a couple questions.

What do you think of the Holy Spirit? Must one have the Holy Spirit to be saved?"
If one does not have the Holy Spirit, one is not saved:

"...Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. - Romans 8:9

"Must one Repent to be saved?"
If one is not previously saved, yet then one calls out to Christ for salvation, one cannot do so unless one has repented from his previous state.

"Must one believe to be saved?
If one refuses to accept the free atonement of the blood of Jesus Christ for one's free pardon, then one will not be covered by that atonement. And one must obviously believe it atones, if one chooses to accept it. And being covered by this atonement is salvation.

"Christ died on the cross for us but we have to accept his gift. How do we accept it? Is it just a mental knowledge of believing that God died for us?"
We accept it by having the faith to call out to God for it. If we call out to God for his mercy, the mercy he has provided us through the shed blood of Jesus Christ, he will hear our call and give us the mercy.

I ask you: How was it required to freely eat from the tree of life in the garden of Eden? We are eating from the new, free tree of life when we call out to God for it. It is just as free today, as it was for Adam and Eve. Why should they be given the chance for such a free eternal life, and not us? God has provided us with the same offer, in a sense, only this time we had to be reedemed, first.

"And last I know that you know God there is no doubt about that, but does God know you? I’m sure all of us know the President, but does know each one of us? There are certain things that God has asked us to do in his word, and if we do no obey what he as asked us to do than we do not get to heaven. Even after you are "Saved"."
God knows everyone, at least in the sense of knowing who they are. However, if you mean in the sense of spiritual intercouse, how could he not know me, if I have called out to him for his mercy, and have been saved?

He knows me, in fact what I write about grace upon this board is from him, for he taught it to me supernaturally.

God bless.
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"Ruht, Well I am glad to see that you believe that Jesus, the Holy Spirit and the Father are the Same person

But you did misquote Romans 8:9

It should have read "Spirit of Christ""
Yes, but they are the same person, and this passage and the next two verses are revelation of that, as they reveal the Trinity; if you are able to discern it.

Technically I did misquote it in that instance, and I am sorry I didn't catch it, but they are the same being, as the Spirit of God is mentioned just prior in the same verse and in reference to the same Spirit.

"BTW, what is Ruht? Is that kind of like "RUT" b/c thats where you are at bro. LOL, just kidding."
It is a derivative of my actual name. It is pronounced "Root;" at least that's how I pronounce it, you can pronounce it anyway you like.

God bless.
 

Briguy

<img src =/briguy.gif>
Nils, Thanks for your concern about Gary. Prayers for his wife and daughter would be good at this point too.

Nils, I must say that I have never heard anyone say that our hearts are made up of one "soil" and it can never change. You obviously believe in predestination. The reason I don't believe the soil (heart) stays the same is that I believe God uses situations and people to soften hearts (kind of like rocks turning to dirt). As the heart softens the soil becomes good and then when the seed is planted it grows and it roots and so is in God's garden forever. You must see a flaw with that example so I will anxiously await your reply.

Take care,
In Christ, Brian
 
R

Ruht

Guest
Ruht,

"It was not "rocky soil," it was a "rock," just as Christ said it was, in Luke 8:6&13, KJV."

"Try reading Matthew 13:5-6 KJV
I've read it, just as I said, and it is referring to what Christ, I, Matthew and Luke say. Are you saying Christ, through Luke, is inaccurate?

"Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

Is it that Matthew who is wrong, or is it you who is wrong?"
It's you who is wrong. You apparently are not capable of properly interpreting scripture.

"Yes, it fell upon stony places, meaning upon stones. There is no deepness of earth upon stones."

"Matthew says "where they had not much earth". Notice Matthew doesn't say "where there was no earth". The seed was rooted in the soil of the heart."
No, it wasn't. and Luke clears that up. Are you calling Luke a lie?

You are just not interpreting the Bible through the author of the Bible, but through your own understanding. And you harden your heart when the truth is presented to you.

"Once again I ask, is Matthew right or are you right?"
And once again I tell you that Jesus is right, Matthew is right, Luke is right, I am right, and YOU are WRONG

I hope that's clear enough for you, legalist.

"Luke is the sharper version of the parable, at least in regard to this; although they both have value and are in the Bible for a reason.

I'm sorry, but you are simply in error."

"Here is how Jesus interpreted the parable:

Matthew 13:20-23

But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful. But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty."
Yes, and he hath not "root in himself," because roots cannot grow into solid rock, just as Christ says in Luke. These types have not received salvation into their hearts.

"According to Jesus, those who are represented by the rocky soil receive it in exactly the same way as those who are good soil."
According to Jesus you are absolutely, 100% WRONG. One received seed "ON" a rock, the other received seed "INTO" good ground. Only an idiot or a stubborn, foolish legalist would say they are both the same.

Or very possibly someone who is both.

"The only ones in which the seed does not grow is represented by the path."
If something did not take root, it obviously did not go inside of anything, and one must receive in the heart salvation, in order to be saved. Head knowledge of some of the Bible won't do it. The seed on the rock did not enter into the hearts of the people it represents, meaning they were never saved, and there is nothing you can do to change this truth.

God bless.

[ August 28, 2002, 03:26 PM: Message edited by: Ruht ]
 

Eladar

New Member
Hey Brian,

Gary's wife and daughter are in my prayers too.

I do believe in predestination. It is a difficult concept to make human arguments for showing God good, but who are we to judge God?

Having said that, I guess it is possible that God works the soil of our heart through our experiences, as a farmer works the soil. (This would be possible with predestination too, God works in His own time)
 

ONENESS

New Member
Originally posted by Ruht:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />"Ruht, Well I am glad to see that you believe that Jesus, the Holy Spirit and the Father are the Same person

But you did misquote Romans 8:9

It should have read "Spirit of Christ""
Yes, but they are the same person, and this passage and the next two verses are revelation of that, as they reveal the Trinity; if you are able to discern it.

Technically I did misquote it in that instance, and I am sorry I didn't catch it, but they are the same being, as the Spirit of God is mentioned just prior in the same verse and in reference to the same Spirit.

"BTW, what is Ruht? Is that kind of like "RUT" b/c thats where you are at bro. LOL, just kidding."
It is a derivative of my actual name. It is pronounced "Root;" at least that's how I pronounce it, you can pronounce it anyway you like.

God bless.
</font>[/QUOTE]
Yes, but they are the same person, and this passage and the next two verses are revelation of that, as they reveal the Trinity; if you are able to discern it.
How do the next two verses give you the revelation of a trinity? The Spirit of Christ is the same as the Holy Spirit or the Spirit of God. God is a Spirit john 4:24

You say the next two verses give you the revelation that there is a trinity. How?
Who raised up Jesus from the Dead? Was it another person? No it was Jesus himself (john 2:19-21). The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are all the same person.

And Ruht, this is where your own truths get you in trouble. Your own interpretation and own understanding of verses that say "you do not sin" is a little bit more to it than what you see. Other wise we would all be perfect. And since we are not perfect than we are going to sin.

God bless

BTW, what is your Name?
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"Your misinterpretations, inspired by Satan, are not the Bible.

Nor are they an "authority."

The devil goeth about as a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.

God bless."

"I believe this is where you said I was of the devil."
Then apparently you can't read, as bad as you can't interpret.

However, for the record, Christ did state that some legalists were of the devil (John 8:44), so it is possible you also are. However, I prefer to be gracious until I know for certain, and I choose to hope that such ignorants as yourself are just the typical unlearned babes in Christ. They also are a real pain. Just read Paul.

God bless.
 

Eladar

New Member
Ruht,

Have you ever grown anything from seed?

The roots are the first thing to grow. It would be impossible for a seed to grow and not have some sort of root system, no matter how stunted to emerge.

Have you ever grown anything in shallow soil? What happens when something is buried in shallow dirt? It springs up quickly, but the soil doesn't hold moisture. The root system gets stunted because it runs into the rock. Jesus is using a parable that the farmers could understand.

If the seeds were never buried by any dirt what so ever, then why wouldn't the birds eat these seeds as they would the ones on the path? They too would be exposed.
No, it wasn't. and Luke clears that up. Are you calling Luke a lie?
No, I'm saying you are misinterpreting what Luke is saying.

I see that there's no making head way here so, lets go on to the other group, the thorns...

Are you saying this group didn't have roots? Once again, if a seed germinates and grows, the roots are the first thing to emerge from the seed. The seed of God's truth starts to grow in this soil, but the plant dies because it gets choked out.

And some fell among thorns, and the thorns sprang up with it and choked it.

Are you going to say that the truth of God did not grow into this soil? There is nothing wrong with this soil, except for the competition. Notice, the thorns sprang up with the plant of God, both sprang out. It was just that the thorns won out.

Your claims of supernatural interpretation reminds me of a Mormon, so I'll remind you of the same Biblical warning God gives all of us, test the spirits. Test the spirit against what the Bible actually says, not what you want it to say.
 

Eladar

New Member
I guess legalists like myself, Paul, and John have no hope.

***See the same thread in the Calvinist Forum***
 
R

Ruht

Guest
"How do the next two verses give you the revelation of a trinity? The Spirit of Christ is the same as the Holy Spirit or the Spirit of God. God is a Spirit john 4:24

You say the next two verses give you the revelation that there is a trinity. How?
Who raised up Jesus from the Dead? Was it another person? No it was Jesus himself (john 2:19-21). The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are all the same person."
I said all three do so, Romans 8:9-11. And this is how:

But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin, and the Spirit is life because of righteousness. But if the Spirit of him which raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." - Romans 8:9-11

The Trinity:

1) The Father = "Spirit of God;" "Spirit which raised up Christ from the dead;" "he that raised up Christ from the dead."

2) The Son = "Spirit of Christ;" "Christ."

3) The Holy Spirit = "Spirit;" "his Spirit that dwelleth in you."

All members of the Trinity are mentioned in this passage, and all are stated to be the same being; if you are able to discern this.

"And Ruht, this is where your own truths get you in trouble. Your own interpretation and own understanding of verses that say "you do not sin" is a little bit more to it than what you see. Other wise we would all be perfect. And since we are not perfect than we are going to sin."
Actually, you not being able to discern the Trinity in that passage reveals you to be the one in error, and destroys your theory about me.

The Bible says the saved do not sin, and the Bible says the saved are indeed "perfected forever." If you are not able to believe it, then so be it, God has provided plenty of milk for the babes in Christ who are not yet able to bear meat.

"BTW, what is your Name?
I just told you. My name is Ruht. If you want my full name, I tend not to divulge that on Internet forums.

God bless.
 

ONENESS

New Member
So what is your view on blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. What if someone falls away and commits this sin. How is their eternal security secure?
 

CatholicConvert

New Member
Ruht --

Ray Sutton is a seminary professor who

A: Doesn't waste his time with fools.

B: Doesn't argue with know-it-alls, since it is a useless exercise.

C: Knows more Greek and scripture in his little finger than you do in yer whole body.

Basically put, he would chew you up and spit you out for breakfast.

Y'all guys have fun with this arrogant twit. I am outta here. He is a self made genius -- a legend in his own mind.

Brother Ed -- who knows the Lord and also knows when time can be put to better use.
 
R

Ruht

Guest
Ruht,

Have you ever grown anything from seed?"
Well yes, as a matter of fact I have. Which is why I know roots can't grown into solid rock.

Have you ever grown anything from seed, by chance?

"The roots are the first thing to grow. It would be impossible for a seed to grow and not have some sort of root system, no matter how stunted to emerge."
Yes, you are very observant. However, while salvation indeed has a "root system," unless it goes into the heart of a person, then the person is not saved.

Let me know when you finally figure out this simple truth, or when your pride allows you to admit you are wrong.

"Have you ever grown anything in shallow soil?"
Well yes, as a matter of fact I've even grown seed on top of soil.

"What happens when something is buried in shallow dirt?"
Um, I don't know, it doesn't grow into a magical beanstalk that reaches up to the clouds where a giant lives, does it?!!

"It springs up quickly, but the soil doesn't hold moisture. The root system gets stunted because it runs into the rock. Jesus is using a parable that the farmers could understand."
He's not using the one you are dishonestly trying to sell.

"If the seeds were never buried by any dirt what so ever, then why wouldn't the birds eat these seeds as they would the ones on the path? They too would be exposed."
The birds can't get every seed. I have grown grass seed on top of soil, and they didn't get every seed.

Nice try, but your desperateness changes nothing. Christ said it landed ON rock, not in rock, and your connivance can't change that.

"No, it wasn't. and Luke clears that up. Are you calling Luke a lie?"

"No, I'm saying you are misinterpreting what Luke is saying."
And I'm saying you are misinterpreting what Jesus, Matthew and Luke are saying, and I know you are.

"I see that there's no making head way here so, lets go on to the other group, the thorns..."
Oh, I've made plenty of "headway," and any honest person can see it.

"Are you saying this group didn't have roots? Once again, if a seed germinates and grows, the roots are the first thing to emerge from the seed. The seed of God's truth starts to grow in this soil, but the plant dies because it gets choked out."
Actually, weeds (thorns) can prevent seed from even germinating. Weeds can produce toxins that can destroy the germinating process and prevent seeds from even taking root.

But of course I'm sure you knew that, you apparently being an expert on seeds and everything.

"And some fell among thorns, and the thorns sprang up with it and choked it.

Are you going to say that the truth of God did not grow into this soil?"
Did it say in grew into the soil? It said it "fell AMONG thorns." It did not say it entered into the soil.

"There is nothing wrong with this soil, except for the competition. Notice, the thorns sprang up with the plant of God, both sprang out. It was just that the thorns won out."
It doesn't say that both "sprang out," it says the thorns sprang up. And even if the seed produced plants that "sprang up," does it say this plant took root into the soil? As I just told you, I have even grown seed on top of soil, which has actually germinated and sprouted on top of soil.

And as a matter of fact, I remember a person who glued rye grass on top of his automobile and watered it and drove around town with grass all over his car, without any of it being in any soil.

In fact, you can read about it here if you don't believe me:

http://www.driveonline.com/html/rotharchive_087.html

"Your claims of supernatural interpretation reminds me of a Mormon, so I'll remind you of the same Biblical warning God gives all of us, test the spirits. Test the spirit against what the Bible actually says, not what you want it to say."
You don't even know how a person is saved, so how can you possibly test a spirit.

Test my Spirit, if you think you are capable. However, you have already failed the test.

God bless.

[ August 29, 2002, 10:29 AM: Message edited by: Ruht ]
 
Top