• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Eternally Begotten of the Father....or not.

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Denying the eternal Son . . . you guys better tread lightly.

If Jesus is not the eternal Son, then there is also no eternal Father. And what is to be said of the Holy Ghost?

1 John 2:22-23
Jesus is the eternal Son because His humanity began on the day of His conception and now goes on into eternity.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
One more time we (OK - I) try to compress eternity into the human life of Jesus Christ, God come in the flesh Who entered the time continuum to redeem us.

RSV Hebrews 2:9 But we see Jesus, who for a little while was made lower than the angels, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for every one.
 

Dave G

Well-Known Member
OK...so, have we cleared up the usage of the term, "eternally begotten of the Father" yet?

By the way Hank, I disagree that He is the eternal Son because His humanity began on the day of His conception;
As I see Scripture stating, He is the Son, even before He came as "the Son of Man" and was born of a virgin.

One more time we (OK - I) try to compress eternity into the human life of Jesus Christ, God come in the flesh Who entered the time continuum to redeem us.

Thanks for clarifying.



May God bless you sir.:)
 
Last edited:

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, He is still saying Christ's sonship began with the incarnation.
No, I am saying Christs sonship is timeless from the point of view of eternity just as Christ died for our sins from before the world began.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Again, we are victimized by the imperfection of human language (which is why legal documents are so tediously long and still not airtight). Jesus is the Son of God. Jesus is the Son of man. Jesus is the Christ. The writer of Hebrews could have used any one of these referring to Jesus who is eternal in origin. Would he have been eternal Messiah for example? Or eternal Son of man?
That is not what was done. Jesus has a mother and a human geneology (Luke's account). And as the Christ His legal human father He has a geneolog (Matthew's account). Only as the Son of God has no geneoloy! Hebrews 7:3.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
No, I am saying Christs sonship is timeless from the point of view of eternity just as Christ died for our sins from before the world began.
It may seem a minor point, but it's important. His sonship has nothing to do with the incarnation. He is the Son by the virtue of His Person.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It may seem a minor point, but it's important. His sonship has nothing to do with the incarnation. He is the Son by the virtue of His Person.
It is related to the following question:

When did the Son of God save you?

1. When you believed.
2. At Calvary.
3. From the foundation of the world.

All are true.
There was a point within the time continuum when the Logos became a human being.

Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,

Before that point in time He was not human. But I don't object to calling the Logos the Son of God because He emanates from the innermost being of the Father eternally.

But He didn't become human until Galatians 4:4.
I am not going to say it anymore.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
It is related to the following question:

When did the Son of God save you?

1. When you believed.
2. At Calvary.
3. From the foundation of the world.

All are true.
There was a point within the time continuum when the Logos became a human being.

Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,

Before that point in time He was not human. But I don't object to calling the Logos the Son of God because He emanates from the innermost being of the Father eternally.

But He didn't become human until Galatians 4:4.
I am not going to say it anymore.

1. When you believed.
3. From the foundation of the world.

And

2: At Calvary
3. From the foundation of the world.

Are two points in time (not three).

At Calvary occurred from the foundation of the world. April 6th 30 AD.

Any point in time after the creation of man is from the foundation of the world.

Two references to consider, Luke 11:50 and Hebrews 9:26.
 

Reformed

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It may seem a minor point, but it's important. His sonship has nothing to do with the incarnation. He is the Son by the virtue of His Person.
And He (Jesus) has always been the Son. There was never a time when He was not the Son. This is not a minor point in which it is OK for Christians to disagree over.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
And He (Jesus) has always been the Son. There was never a time when He was not the Son. This is not a minor point in which it is OK for Christians to disagree over.
The issue is the false teaching that the Son was somehow eternally generated (caused). This error gave rise to Arianism. And in this modern day, some Trinitarians denying the concept of the eternal Son on account of this error.
 

Reformed

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The issue is the false teaching that the Son was somehow eternally generated (caused). This error gave rise to Arianism. And in this modern day, some Trinitarians denying the concept of the eternal Son on account of this error.
The Son was never "caused". The Son proceeds forth from the Father as part of the economy within the Trinity. There is a categorical distinction between begotten in an economic sense and cause. I have been reading your posts and have not responded to them because you repeatedly fail to see the difference.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
It is related to the following question:

When did the Son of God save you?

1. When you believed.
2. At Calvary.
3. From the foundation of the world.

All are true.
There was a point within the time continuum when the Logos became a human being.

Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,

Before that point in time He was not human. But I don't object to calling the Logos the Son of God because He emanates from the innermost being of the Father eternally.

But He didn't become human until Galatians 4:4.
I am not going to say it anymore.
I get what you're saying. You're in error.
 

Dave G

Well-Known Member
I get what you're saying. You're in error.

No I am not.

Perhaps, perhaps not.

Emanate is not generate.

Emanate:
mid 18th century: from Latin emanat- ‘flowed out,’ from the verb emanare, from e- (variant of ex- ) ‘out’ + manare ‘to flow.’

" Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me." ( John 8:42 )

" I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father." ( John 16:28 )

Aaron, in a rough sense I have to agree.
Why not let Hank explain?;)
 
Last edited:

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Am I to understand you deny John 1:3 in regards to John 1:14?
No disagreement with this, that I can see.
Being the only begotten of the Father would mean that he was eternally God, and thus was the Creator of all things!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The term "begotten" actually denotes having a beginning. The Son of God with His Father have no beginning. The term "begotten" denotes being caused. Both the Son of God and His Father are uncaused being both the one and the same uncaused God.
The Biblical Greek meaning to that term does not refer to a beginning though, but to endless proceeding forth from the Father!
 
Top