Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Here's another way of looking at it. Faith comes by hearing the word. So we must have scripture directly supporting our church practices before we can have faith in the matter. And then consider Paul saying "whatever is not of faith is sin".
Please read post # 115
How is a woman SS any different from a pastor... for kids?This op is NOT about Sunday School
it is about female pastors - lets get back on topic
Dave, you say this, but your posts went way off of the women in charge topic and went into whether or not SS itself was biblical. That has nothing to do with this topic. Start a new thread if you would like to discuss that.How is a woman SS any different from a pastor... for kids?
I am not off topic because women SS teachers are functioning as pastors and teachers.Dave, you say this, but your posts went way off of the women in charge topic and went into whether or not SS itself was biblical. That has nothing to do with this topic. Start a new thread if you would like to discuss that.
But that is not what you were discussing. I don't see anything that says women cannot teach other women in Scriipture. They are not to teach men. What you were discussing is not on topic, you were discussing whether or not SS itself is biblical. That has nothing to do with women teachers as they are not the only teachers in SS. For example, my dad is a SS teacher. I have been a SS teacher. We are obviously not women.I am not off topic because women SS teachers are functioning as pastors and teachers.
No scripture = no faith = sin. Whatever is not of faith is sin.But that is not what you were discussing. I don't see anything that says women cannot teach other women in Scriipture. They are not to teach men. What you were discussing is not on topic, you were discussing whether or not SS itself is biblical. That has nothing to do with women teachers as they are not the only teachers in SS. For example, my dad is a SS teacher. I have been a SS teacher. We are obviously not women.
So you can discuss the merits of women teachers, but not whether or not there should be SS at all.
I am not off topic because women SS teachers are functioning as pastors and teachers.
Sunday School Teacher = women teaching if the teachers are women.This moderator says you are incorrect about this quoted statement.
Therefore, please take davetaylors advice and start a new thread.
What's not? If the reference is to the specific words "complementary roles", then I agree. However, I see that subject as being addressed in numerous places in scripture, some of which were noted 4 posts after your above response. Just listing some references (books only, for now) - 1 Corinthians, Ephesians, 1 Timothy, 1 Peter. There likely are moreThat's not in the Bible.
Do you accept the fact that Phoebe was a Deacon? Do you have female deacons in your church? We do.What's not? If the reference is to the specific words "complementary roles", then I agree. However, I see that subject as being addressed in numerous places in scripture, some of which were noted 4 posts after your above response. Just listing some references (books only, for now) - 1 Corinthians, Ephesians, 1 Timothy, 1 Peter. There likely are more
Do you accept the fact that Phoebe was a Deacon? Do you have female deacons in your church? We do.
[Rom 16:1-2 NKJV] 1 I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church in Cenchrea, 2 that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also.
Paul could commend this woman not only for what she had done as a faithful sister and servant of Christ but also for what she was soon to do in further service to their Lord. It is almost certain that Phoebe delivered this letter in person to the church at Rome, a responsibility of considerable magnitude.
In Christ, we belong to God not only as “fellow citizens with the saints” in His divine kingdom but also are brothers and sisters in His di- vine “household” (Eph. 2:19). To refer to Phoebe as our sister meant that she was a devoted member of the family of God, and the context makes clear that she was especially dear to Paul.
Paul next commends Phoebe as a servant beloved by those she served in her home church at Cenchrea, and probably in the mother church at Corinth as well.
Servant translates diakonos, the term from which we get deacon. The Greek word here is neuter and was used in the church as a general term for servant before the offices of deacon and deaconess were developed.
The same word was used for Stephen.
Probably because there are not any.In short, I don't think there is any valid argument to support women pastors. I've not seen one instance of an argument, from Scripture, that would support it.
Correct!I am not off topic because women SS teachers are functioning as pastors and teachers.
In other threads, Dr. Bob has explained that a feminine word could have been used were Phoebe a mere servant.But the question is this, was Paul referring to the Office of Deacon, or just a servant, as we should all be?
Hello? Still waiting for 1689Dave or others to answer this....OK...Offerings - would your 'model church' insist that people place their $$$ down at the leaders feet?
Because, Acts!