Calvibaptist
New Member
Do you seriously think that God's grace begins when someone has faith? Is there no grace before that?Originally posted by Me4Him:
Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
God has the "GRACE" but it is not given until there is first "FAITH" in Jesus.
This verse doesn't mention regeneration, so you wasted your energy typing in capital letters on this one.Ro 10:9 That..if.. thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
The "IF", "believe in thine heart", comes "BEFORE", "thou shalt be saved".
Not sure what this has to do with regeneration...De 11:26 Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse;
27 A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the LORD your God, which I command you this day:
28 And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the LORD your God,
God doesn't "Change" and neither does his "plan of salvation".
I'm sorry, could you please re-read Roman's 4 and tell me where it says "Abraham's faith" or even "his faith?" The closest you come is to Paul's application in verse 5, which says, "Now to him who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted as righteousness."Ro 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
It was "Abraham's FAITH", not God's faith, that was "COUNTED TO HIM", because the faith belonged to Abraham, not God.
But you have to be very careful not making this section say more than it is. This is the same section the Catholics use to talk about our faith being our righteousness before God. It is also the same section the New Perspective on Paul people turn to to discredit forensic justification and the imputation of Christ's righteousness. Needless to say, I believe they are both wrong, and they make the same emphasis you do from this section. You're in good company!
You take one verse out of context to say that God calls many who are not chosen??? The "many called" are the ones to whom the general call of the gospel goes out, such as when an evangelist stands on the street corner and proclaims the gospel. This is not the call of God. The call of God comes to a person's heart and effects what it sets out to do.God calls many who are not chosen, is God's calling at fault for not giving them the "Faith" they need to believe, if it is then scripture lied when it said Jesus didn't come to condemn the world and die for the sins of the whole world that the world through him "might be" saved.
John 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.Why the "might be" if it not possible for the whole world to be saved???
Boy, you really don't know what you are talking about, do you? The one word translated "might be saved" is sothey. It is a subjunctive in form. We use it often to indicate something that is not necessarily just a possibility. For instance, "I bought a car so that I might be able to drive to work." It just gives the reason why I did something.
You try to attribute to God your definition of love and fairness. God says He loves His children more than those who are the children of the devil. God isn't a sinner, is He? God says He mold some vessels for honor and some vessels for dishonor. God isn't a sinner, is he?Calvin accuses God of some "Characteristics" that only "Sinners" possess,
1. if you don't "LOVE", you sin.
Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world,
Ro 12:9 Let love be without dissimulation.
Ro 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
2. Respect of persons = sin
Jas 2:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Ro 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Calvin doctrine is based more on Ignorance of scripture, than "knowledge".
For someone who constantly misquotes Scripture, ignores what others have said, doesn't know basic Greek, and has no clue what the differences are between basic theological words, it seems a little arrogan to say that Calvin's doctrine is based on ignorance rather than knowledge.