Originally posted by James_Newman:
Acts 10:43
43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in
him shall receive remission of sins.
The problem with your interpretation of this Scripture is that you forget that the Bible also states that man is dead in sins and trespasses and that the natural man has no interest in the things of the Spirit, and so for the natural man to have any interest at all in the things of the Lord, the Lord must open that man's heart and turn him to the Savior.
At that point, he believes, because the Lord had quickened him, and so the statement that he receives remission of sins comes true for him.
One truth must precede and proceed from another. Either man is naturally at variance with his maker, or not. Which is it for you, James ?
Acts 16:30-31
30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
Now, if believing (faith) on the Savior precedes regeneration, and the Bible is the Word of God, is the promise that salvation will also come to 'thy house' a true experience of
all who profess salvation ?
Maybe all your household profess salvation, but, is that true of every Christian you personally know, James ?
Or could this principle in Acts 16:30-31 be akin, simply, to the statement made by Paul that the unbelieving husband or wife is sanctified thru the believing spouse, and so with the children ?
John 3:18
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Again, one cannot believe unless one is brought back to life. Faith comes after regeneration, not before. Regeneration is not the result of faith. It is the work of the Holy Spirit, a drawing of the elect child of God to Christ by the Father. And those who thus believe as a result of their regeneration, have from the beginning not been condemned, because they were chosen unto salvation in Christ.
Those who do not believe do not believe because it is not given to them. I think such a principle that God chooses is clearly illustrated in this incident in Matthew 13:10-12
And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
Gal 3:22 But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
And truly, I do not hold, nor preach, that the elect are born saved here in time. In the eternal purpose and mind of God, none of His elect will ever be lost, for they are all in Christ.
All are concluded, declared, proven, to be under sin, and all are brought to salvation thru the blood of Christ, shed both in time, and in eternity past as the Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world.
As for those who believe ?
As I've said, then and now, they believe because the message is to them, not the world.
People have taken the doctrine of election and run with it to such an extreme that they believe it somehow nullifies the rest of the bible.
On the contrary, I believe that the Doctrine of Grace, properly understood, confirms, not nullifies, the rest of the Bible.
One thing you need to remember is that all the scripture is inspired. I realize that you are doubting the inspiration of the new testament, I saw your other posts on other threads. But the NT is inspired scripture, and not just the Calvin verses that teach God's sovereignty,
I asked if the New Testament, in its entirety, is God-breathed, in the sense that Isaiah declares, thus saith the Lord ? Am I going to hell because I doubt, if I do, the inspiration of the New Testament, specifically the Pauline and General Epistles ? Does that mean I am unregenerate because I do not accept the established notion ?
I know that Paul and Peter rightly divided the Old Testament. I know that they drew their doctrines and their teachings from the Old Testament, but considering the dates they were written, on what Scripture do we base our teaching that 'All Scripture' means to include even the writings of Paul, Peter, etc. ?
I except the Book of Revelation and, maybe, the Gospels.
....but also the free-will verses that teach a man's responsibility to believe the Gospel when he hears it.
I do not say that man has no responsibility to believe the Gospel when he hears it, but,
which men ? ALL men ? I don't think so.
The unregenerate, the unelect, have no responsibility to obey what they do not believe, what God has not caused them to believe.
God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure applies to his children in Christ Jesus not the unregenerate.
Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself, applies to those who are His own in the Ephesian church, not to those who are not His.
His people have the responsibility for gospel obedience, yes, but the heathen will give account of themselves to Him in due time.
You must be able to believe them both or you have something out of balance. The scriptures do not contradict themselves. You have put something out of its place and made more of it than God intended you to make of it.
That's your opinion, you're entitled to it.
I know a pastor in the Phillipines that you should talk to.
Only problem is, I'm in the States.