I cannot see who you are talking to so it is likely they are on my ignore list. If what is in your quotes is an example of how they spoke about me then you can see why they are. I have had to expand my list because of continuous statements like that (ten or more post).
Thank you for your words. I think arresting people over a wet willy is too much. It is harmless and arresting them is unnecessary. By the way, I never said "slap her" I said anyone who supports arresting someone for a wet willy (a childish kids game) should be slapped. It was means as in slap someone to wake them up it was not intended to be taken literally. Now if I remember correctly one or more of those who are on my ignore list will now accuse me (cuz that is what they are good at) of walking back what I said. Nope just clarifying.
I read the link. It was much more than a "wet willy" or a childish kids game. The man was charged with battery.
As I stated above, the headline has created the confusion by referring to the abuse as the "wet willy". Unfortunate choice of words which distorted the perception of the assault.
Abuse is about displaying power over someone, making them feel helpless. In this case, in front of the woman's daughter.
I know you never said "slap her". Just from memory, you said "anyone pursuing these charges should be slapped". Since she was the one pursuing the charges, it can easily be assumed you were referring to her.
I hope it was a poor choice of words. When I lived in Kansas City, I used to say, "Whoever designed these streets should be slapped " I wasn't really suggesting someone be slapped, but I was expressing frustration at layout of the city.
Perhaps, don't let me put words in your mouth, you were expressing frustration that someone might be arrested for a simple "wet willy", which gives the visual of sneaky up behind your girlfriend and quickly, and gently, putting a wet finger in her ear.
Again, what happened to this woman was not that.
