No, the point was that he didn't remove them for being Calvinist necessarily. There were other big issues.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Forcibly Removing All the Tulips at SWBTS
- Thread starter gb93433
- Start date
gb93433 said:
Your comparison of Burleson to what Luther did is in complete error and quite sensationalistic.
Typical. Read it for yourself everyone. It an "us verses them" mentality with these Fundamentalists Baptist Identity folk.
Paige our Pope! Hail Paige...Hail Paige....Hail Paige
Grasshopper said:
I seem obsessed with Burleson? How many posts do you find from me about him to prove your allegation?
And do you think that is all the details of it? You need to research it more before speaking.
Apparently you do not know enough to speak on this as well.
From the mouth of Pope Paige himself regarding the firing of Klouda:
Stone her! say the Baptist Identity Fundies.
Question (Richardson): Well, I’m interested in whether or not you claim here under oath today, Dr. Patterson, that you mentioned to these two gentlemen (Blaising and Allen) any concern about her (Klouda) violating the stipulation that she was placed under?
Answer (Patterson): Yes, I did mention it to both of them.
Q. And what — what is it you say you said to them?
A. I don’t recall the exact conversation, of course, but I did say to them that I felt that there was violation taking place perhaps, and furthermore, that I felt that it was inappropriate ecclesiologically for her to be in this position.
Q. And what was the violation that you claim here today that you told them that you thought was taking place?
A. I believe that she was indulging in the exposition of the scripture.
Q. Giving her own conclusions?
A. Uh-huh.
Q. Yes?
A. Yes, I’m sorry.
Dr. Klouda, a Hebrew professor, trained at Criswell College in the subject of Hebrew, bestowed the Master's and Doctoral Degrees from Southwestern Theological Seminary for her expertise in the Hebrew language, hired unanimously by the trustees of Southwestern Seminary Theological Seminary to teach Hebrew - 'indulged' in drawing conclusions about the sacred text.Answer (Patterson): Yes, I did mention it to both of them.
Q. And what — what is it you say you said to them?
A. I don’t recall the exact conversation, of course, but I did say to them that I felt that there was violation taking place perhaps, and furthermore, that I felt that it was inappropriate ecclesiologically for her to be in this position.
Q. And what was the violation that you claim here today that you told them that you thought was taking place?
A. I believe that she was indulging in the exposition of the scripture.
Q. Giving her own conclusions?
A. Uh-huh.
Q. Yes?
A. Yes, I’m sorry.
Stone her! say the Baptist Identity Fundies.
gb93433 said:
wow...this conservation has turned. I don't think character defamation is ever a way to tip the scales of your argument.
I hope this gets cleaned up.
I hope this gets cleaned up.
OldRegular
Well-Known Member
I was pleased to read Dr Mohler's comments on the web site you referenced and to see that the Abstract of Principles is again in effect at Southern Seminary.Pastor Larry said:
OldRegular
Well-Known Member
I was pleased to read Dr Mohler's comments on the web site you referenced and to see that the Abstract of Principles is again in effect at Southern Seminary.Pastor Larry said:
OldRegular
Well-Known Member
I have engaged in some spirited discussions with Pastor Larry and others on this Forum regarding the doctrine of Dispensationalism. On occasion I believe that discussion has become too spirited to continue. That being said the acrimony on this thread over and by certain men is beyond belief on a Christian discussion Forum.
I assume many involved in the discussion are pastors and privy to information of which I am ignorant. However, it seems to me that the bitterness apparent in some of the remarks is totally unwarranted among Christians. This bitterness exceeds much of what I have seen posted on the Politics Forum.
I assume many involved in the discussion are pastors and privy to information of which I am ignorant. However, it seems to me that the bitterness apparent in some of the remarks is totally unwarranted among Christians. This bitterness exceeds much of what I have seen posted on the Politics Forum.
preachinjesus said:
The only character assassination going on is of Dr. Patterson and anyone who dares oppose that action. Burleson is slandering with no clear evidence.
gb93433 said:
He has been confronted with the truth. He of course responds with the grandiose notion that if it does not come true it is because he exposed it.
Grasshopper said:
What is going on ought to be a lesson for all of us to heed. If a man always carries truth, righteousness, and justice people will not have any reason to distrust him. Integrity is really quite a simple thing if you always stay focused on what is right.Revmitchell said: