• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Four reasonable questions concerning KJVO

JD731

Well-Known Member
Your opinion is incorrect because you are ignoring or avoiding the fact that that translating was part of the process of the giving of New Testament Scripture by direct inspiration of God to the apostles and NT prophets. Therefore, it is not the same situation with post-NT translating that was not part of the giving of Scripture to the prophets and apostles as with the pre-1611 English Bibles, with the 1611 KJV, or with post-1611 English Bibles. Therefore, your comparison is invalid, and it does not prove what you suggest.



I also compare Scripture with scripture, and I do not find that results in your inconsistent, human KJV-only opinions. By affirming the truth concerning what the verses do not state and teach, it leads to what they do teach, which is not your KJV-only opinions.

The truth is consistent, and I am advocating consistent truth. I am not at all negative towards the KJV by accepting the truth concerning it. I am being positive by applying the same truth consistently and justly to the word of God translated into present-day English as in the NKJV.

It is your KJV-only opinions that could be considered completely negative and condemning toward the word of God translated into present-day English. You also seem to be completely negative and condemning towards any believer who disagrees with your opinions and private interpretations.


I am not willing to continue this banter. If you continue to be humanly consistent in refusing to produce the doctrine in the scriptures that supports your doctrines that you consistently advocate here, that is, a never ending line of new English translations and paraphrases, some written particularly to target the homos and queers that God says in at least 4 passages, cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Plus the idea that the Grecians and 1st century Greek speakers are the only Christians worthy of an inspired Bible for the common man, the babe if you will, who only are likely to believe God if we can believe what he says.

1Co 6:9
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

These guys need a gospel preacher, not a translation to fit their lifestyle. A Bible is not going to do them much good.

If you will support your doctrine instead of attacking mine I might respond.
 
Last edited:

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If you continue to be humanly consistent in refusing to produce the doctrine in the scriptures that supports your doctrines that you consistently advocate here, that is, a never ending line of new English translations and paraphrases, some written particularly to target the homos and queers that God says in at least 4 passages, cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

I am being scripturally consistent, applying the same truths consistently both before and after 1611. You offer bogus, false strawman distortions that are not at all my scripturally-based position. You bear false witness with your bogus strawmen. You perhaps know that you are being inconsistent.

I have backed my consistent scripturally-based principles or points from the Scriptures while you dismiss and disregard a consistent application of scriptural truths.
 
Top