• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Four Unities Prove 1st Century Rapture: Good News for all Christians

Status
Not open for further replies.

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
(This is is an article I wrote last January in my own Preterist group. I thought it would be worth posting here as well. The position I have taken here has made me persona non grata in some Preterists groups but I believe it is biblically sound. I think that both futurists and "mainstream" preterism have overlooked these four unities, resulting in unscriptural eschatologies in both camps.

A part of my reason for posting this here is to show that there are preterists like myself who believe in visible coming of Christ as well as a literal experiential rapture, not a mere covenantal or positional change, as Don Preston teaches. Moreover I believe that after this rapture c. AD 70 there were, for a short period, no Christians on Earth.)

1 Thess. 4:13 – 18

13, But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.
14, For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
15, For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
16, For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17, Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.


18, Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

I think Aristotle wrote also about unities in his Poetics, but I am referring to four different unities altogether, much more important, having to do with the Rapture and the union of living believers with those who had died in Christ. Studying this as we see it in Thessalonians is very important because it shows clearly the nature of the Rapture.

It also shows why both the modern futurist view of the rapture and the Max King variant of Preterism overlook (and I am being kind) key points of doctrine found in this chapter.

By making a big deal out of “unity” I am just underscoring that this is one single, tremendous event, that happens to both groups of believers: The dead in Christ, waiting in Hades and the living saints. The more we dwell on this point the clearer the picture becomes.

It is not something that happened in an (ethnically and geographically) limited way in AD 70 but with the Main Event still in the future (as some futurists and Partial-Preterists believe).

Neither can this profound event have happened and yet having the surviving saints of the time still physically on the Earth, unchanged and still un-rescued from ongoing tribulation. Aside from proofs that I will get to below that this is impossible we have the express words of Jesus (Matt. 24:22) that “ unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved“. The “cutting short” is the Rapture.

Neither is it a mere positional change for living believers from that time onward (per Max King Preterists). A careful study of these unities show that is a Scriptural and logical impossibility.

Unity of Time: One event.

“the dead in Christ shall rise first: , Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them”

Although there are technically two stages of the event here they must necessarily have happened almost simultaneously.

Unity of Action

Same passage: “rise first“, “caught up together

What happened to the dead is what happened to the living. However different the two groups started from the same event brings them together.

Problem for the futurist: The dead in Christ must still be in the ground, or in Hades, if their scenario is to be believed. Yet Scripture foretold that this event would happen in that first-century generation.

Unity of Essence (And for this one I need to go to other passages)

Although the two groups were quite different prior to the Rapture, only the living saints being still physical, both groups are now made fit for eternity.

“Flesh and blood cannot enter into the Kingdom of God“, I Cor. 15:50

“For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.” Matt. 22:30

“We shall be like Him” 1st John 3:2


And how shall we be like Him: As He was “in the days of His flesh” (Heb. 5:7) or as He prayed to return to in John 17:5?

Now, if we believe the Max King version of Preterism, we have two groups who are quite different, however they might concede this change on those who were in Hades the King Preterists have believers who are still quite physical. So they are forced to make the change here of the surviving Christians merely positional. Or they emphasize the ongoing nature of the change, as Christians die they are translated into their new life and presence with Christ. Well, that is true, but these passages are not speaking of Christians throughout the ages. They are speaking of – and to – Christians of that time.

Unity of Place – in the clouds, with Christ forever – NOT on Earth.

We have the two groups both in one place. They are first in the clouds. Note: This is very important. The saints on the Earth are in the clouds. No longer making footprints on the Earth. A mere positional in the living saints just does not satisfy the text here.

They are with Christ forever. And we will join them when we die. The proof for that is in plenty of other passages.

I welcome any comments and feedback on this post. I do not pretend to have all the answers on this. Experience has taught me that hastily stated dogmatic positions can quickly be regretted. The Internet is really good for reality checking. But also for iron sharpening iron, which is what I hope this is.

Comforting Truth

When I first wrote the earlier post I was annoyed to see that verse 18 was bolded and in a much larger font. I do not know how that happened but I am glad now that it did. I left it as it is. What better emphasis than that last verse!?

This passage, rightly understood, has plenty of comfort.

For first century Christians it proved that their faith in those numerous and specific promises of relief and reward from Christ and His Apostles was well-placed.

For us it is also an assurance of our reward and relief. The faith is the same. So is the Object.

“All the promises of God are Yes and Amen in Christ Jesus.” 2 Cor. 1:20

I honestly don't understand what you just said.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Literally? He literally leveled mountains? Which ones? He literally raised valleys? Where?

I totally agree the prophecies were fulfilled, but not in the literal sense.
He literally fulfilled the role of the forerunner, according to prophecy.

peace to you
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Agreed.

He DID NOT literally raise valleys, level mountains, straighten highways.....
Glad we agree.

I guess I’m misunderstanding the position you are taking. Do you think the role of the forerunner of the Christ has not yet been fulfilled?

peace to you
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you think the role of the forerunner of the Christ has not yet been fulfilled?

<sigh> Of course the forerunner of the Christ was John the Baptist. Besides raising valleys, leveling mountains, grading the rough places, and straightening highways, he was also Elijah. Matthew 17:12-13.
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
I notice you never really pondered the implication of the passages.

Peter was apostle to the circumcision, his audience was Jewish, the language was hyperbole, or apocalyptic, or metaphorical, or whatever you want to call it, anything but literal, just as meant by the 'new heaven and the new earth' and John the Baptist raised valleys, leveled mountains, straightened crooked roads, smoothed rough places and a multitude of other such passages.

If Peter's words are entirely metaphorical, then all Christians being removed from the earth in 70CE is also metaphorical. Did the Apostles metaphorically remain to keep evangelizing the sinners that metaphorically burned, yet metaphorically still remained on earth?

Honestly, the preterist position is utterly untenable regarding the return of Christ in 70CE. Parts of Jesus prophetic word regarding Israel certainly came to fruition, but the whole of Jesus prophetic word has yet to be fulfilled.
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
It is hard to get people to see this simple fact. Using the verses you posted we are either under the entirety of the Mosaic Law or we are in the time after the time heaven and earth passed away. How can it be any clearer that this is not astronomy that we are talking about?
Sigh...when Jesus said "It is finished" he not only was referring to the penal substitutionary atonement for his sheep, but also the end of the Mosaic Covenant. The New Covenant took its place.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You ever meditate on this one?:

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass away from the law, till all things be accomplished. Mt 5

....ye also were made dead to the law........we have been discharged from the law..... Ro 7:4,6

....the old covenant......is done away..... 2 Cor 3:14

....having abolished ......the law of commandments contained in ordinances....... Eph 2:15


So, when exactly did Matt 5:18 take place?

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; Col 2:14

That still does not negate that 2 Peter 3:12 was future tense to when Peter wrote . - Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, (vi Fut Pas 3 Pl) and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?

The heavens and earth shall pass away?
 

timtofly

Well-Known Member
It is hard to get people to see this simple fact. Using the verses you posted we are either under the entirety of the Mosaic Law or we are in the time after the time heaven and earth passed away. How can it be any clearer that this is not astronomy that we are talking about?
Why make the church, the fullness of the Gentiles sound like a gap per Genesis 1:1?


There is a gap between the life of Christ, so the Gentile church can enter Paradise. Should the Jews have been more inclusive in the 1400 years before Christ, or should God have ruled the Nations with the Hammer of Grace? Certainly some barbarians thought God having a Hammer was appropriate.

You all make it sound like the church should have been first and then the Mosaic Covenant. Despite the fact the church was a worse whore, than Israel, the church was stronger around the world for the last 1991 years, than those who had to live under the Law. For all those who want the church over and done with in the first century, and the NT all wrapped up and history complete, seem to have had too much prosperity, and not enough hardship.

Prosperity thrives where the Gospel is more universally appealing. Because the church is confessing sin, and God is healing the Land. That is how the church is supposed to operate. The church should not be defined by history. All should look back and see how the church defined history, good and bad. Then Remember no one keeps track of good news. All people tend to record, is the bad.
 

timtofly

Well-Known Member
<sigh> Of course the forerunner of the Christ was John the Baptist. Besides raising valleys, leveling mountains, grading the rough places, and straightening highways, he was also Elijah. Matthew 17:12-13.
John the Baptist was not literally Elijah. That would be reincarnation. Is the claim here, Jesus let His disciples think reincarnation was a valid reality? They just saw Elijah come to earth and fulfill the prophecy. It was not John the Baptist on the mount of Transfiguration. Should Jesus have pointed out they just witnessed the event of Elijah coming to earth? Should not Elijah appearing with Jesus accomplish the prophecy?
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sigh...when Jesus said "It is finished" he not only was referring to the penal substitutionary atonement for his sheep, but also the end of the Mosaic Covenant. The New Covenant took its place.

I don't know why you are sighing. I agree with all that. But you miss my point. Read it again.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If Peter's words are entirely metaphorical, then all Christians being removed from the earth in 70CE is also metaphorical. Did the Apostles metaphorically remain to keep evangelizing the sinners that metaphorically burned, yet metaphorically still remained on earth?

Honestly, the preterist position is utterly untenable regarding the return of Christ in 70CE. Parts of Jesus prophetic word regarding Israel certainly came to fruition, but the whole of Jesus prophetic word has yet to be fulfilled.

You apply an "utterly untenable" interpretative grid over the Bible and then fault Preterism for your own weird grid. Both Preterists and futurists recognize that the Bible does have both metaphorical and literal passages. Your comments above make it sound like it is an either-or proposition.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So, when exactly did Matt 5:18 take place?

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; Col 2:14

Probably here, or the 'countdown' started here and culminated with the destruction of the temple et al.:

50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; Mt 27

That still does not negate that 2 Peter 3:12 was future tense to when Peter wrote .

Right. 2 Peter was written 65-68 AD, temple sacrificial system destroyed 70 AD. Consider these statements from Peter:

who was foreknown indeed before the foundation of the world, but was manifested at the end of times for your sake, 1 Pet 1:20

But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore of sound mind, and be sober unto prayer: 1 Pet 4.7

For the time is come for judgment to begin at the house of God: and if it begin first at us, what shall be the end of them that obey not the gospel of God? 1 Pet 4:17

And in covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose sentence now from of old lingereth not, and their destruction slumbereth not. 2 Pet 2.3
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If Peter's words are entirely metaphorical

You ever meditate on this one?:

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass away from the law, till all things be accomplished. Mt 5

....ye also were made dead to the law........we have been discharged from the law..... Ro 7:4,6

....the old covenant......is done away..... 2 Cor 3:14

....having abolished ......the law of commandments contained in ordinances....... Eph 2:15
 

37818

Well-Known Member
. . . temple sacrificial system destroyed 70 AD.
The physical temple in 70 AD. But God's presence in that place ended at the cross, Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45 and John 19:30. And on Pentecost, Acts of the Apostles 2:4 the believers became the temple of God.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The physical temple in 70 AD. But God's presence in that place ended at the cross, Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45 and John 19:30. And on Pentecost, Acts of the Apostles 2:4 the believers became the temple of God.

...that's kinda what I wrote:

"...Probably here, or the 'countdown' started here and culminated with the destruction of the temple et al.:

50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; Mt 27..."
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
John the Baptist was not literally Elijah.

Right, he denied it:

21 And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elijah? And he saith, I am not. Art thou the prophet? And he answered, No. Jn 1

But...you think maybe his Daddy told him about this?:

17 And he shall go before his face in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to walk in the wisdom of the just; to make ready for the Lord a people prepared for him. Lu 1

...and Jesus makes no bones about it:

12 but I say into you, that Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but did unto him whatsoever they would. Even so shall the Son of man also suffer of them.
13 Then understood the disciples that he spake unto them of John the Baptist. Mt 17
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top