• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

free will vs. election???????

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jesus sometimes "marvelled" at the unbelief of his hearers (Mark 6:6). But if he subscribed to and taught Total Inability, it would have been no marvel at all that men would disbelieve God, right?

That was for the benefit of those around Him...

24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,

25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.

29 The people therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to him.

30 Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes.

31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.

I added to post 399...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
what i have said is ad hominem? I dont think you know what that word means.

Welcome to B.B. most of the time an informal logical fallacy is alleged, it is done so inaccurately or inappropriately. It's often the "Straw-man" allegation which is most entertaining to read........and somewhat sad.
 
A few of the posters on this thread post like there is a difference between them and Cain before salvation. Cain was a sinner, so was everyone on this thread. I assume all posters are saved, so since salvation, all posters are now like Abel. We all got there the same way, grace through faith in Jesus Christ.

The Lord has got to shake His head when we post an entire thread in the mindset of our opinion of what the word "fair" means. We do not begin to understand the eternal or the depths of God. Our thoughts are not God's thoughts. The theme runs through the thread, implied or not, that it is not "fair" for God to have chosen Abel and not Cain, as Cain did not have a "chance." All these conclusions come from flawed humans, like myself. What we are doing is putting God in a box, with the method He must be "fair" and give everyone a "chance." On the other side of the arugment, God is put in a box saying Cain had a "chance" even if not chosen, and that is "fair."

The point is we are not the Creator, but the created. It is a miracle we are here to type some of this nonsense. The created does not explain what the Creator does or how. The Creator lets the created know what He wants to. In our case, God chose love, mercy, grace, and forgiveness as a way for sinful man to be eternally with Him. Everyone of us deserve to be Cain, and only God in His love makes any of us Abel. How He does that is His business. No man comes to the Father than by Jesus Christ, and no man responds to the Gospel except by a touch from the same God in the form of the Holy Spirit. If God only saved one person in history, it would be more than we deserved. I see His choosing is quite abundent, as there are at least ten saved in this one thread.

We will never understand the depths of God's love this side of eternity. One thing that would be wise IMO, is to take words like fair and chance, and find different terms for God's love. Cain or Abel??? Same could be said for Issac instead of Ishamel, Jacob instead of Esau, David instead of Saul, the eleven disciples instead of Judas, Pharoah had no "chance"??? Annias and Saphira had no "chance" not "fair", Noah's family vs the rest of the world, "not fair" ???? Job, cant even figure that one out, can you?

Whatever knowledge each of you have to post was given to you from God. He, in His eternal purposes, saved each one of you. We should be thankful for what we have, and praise Him for it. Maybe if we did more of that and less debating on how it was accomplished, we would be clearer in our understanding of the Almighty.

All those words I bolded don't mean what you say they do, according to HW. So eternity is only for "a certain space of time" and not for ever....:rolleyes:
 
HW, you posted this on page 21:

im getting there if you will stop interrupting our discussion--I know you are trying to trap me and are not interested in the truth--pls let the conversation continue--lets see what the text really means ?

We are now on page 41 and you still haven't gotten there. Please own up and fess up......
 

Thomas Helwys

New Member
I need to get a calculator and engage the scientific notation function to count the number of times the charge of "strawman" is bantered and pontificated by some at everything they read and do not like.

Yes, indeed, and some need to learn the definition of a word before using it.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
But God still spoke to them! He gave Cain a chance to make things right! He even said "If thou doeth well, shalt thou not be accepted?" Cain responded to Him...he heard him...and responded to him!

Appreciate that you hold your ground on the "total inablility" issue. I too do not share the position of those in the DoG camp on the issue of total inability. Your observation of the events in the Genesis record certainly suggest that man is irreconcilably separated from God, but retains the ability or redemption only according to His grace.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
HW, you posted this on page 21:



We are now on page 41 and you still haven't gotten there. Please own up and fess up......

lol!!! :laugh:

Clouds but no rain. :rolleyes:

Now, if he ever owns up and 'fesses up, well well, we'll really know something has changed in him. For the good. Up to this point his character is marred by his support and engagement in fabrications. :smilewinkgrin:

I'd be seriously worried about myself if I could engage in that behavior and carry on as if everything is OK while showing no repentance about it whatsoever. THAT right there tells a lot about a person.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
My mistake -- in my last post I thought Heir of Salivation was the one being spoken to, not HW.

I apologize to HW.

But as far as what I said, it implies to Heir of Salivation 100%.

- Blessings
 

DrJamesAch

New Member
That is why it is essential to be born from above.The supernatural work of God in bringing a dead sinner to life giving him a new heart is the crucial element necessary.That is why the confession wisely worded it this way;


1._____ Those whom God hath predestinated unto life, he is pleased in his appointed, and accepted time, effectually to call, by his Word and Spirit, out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ; enlightening their minds spiritually and savingly to understand the things of God; taking away their heart of stone, and giving unto them a heart of flesh; renewing their wills, and by his almighty power determining them to that which is good, and effectually drawing them to Jesus Christ; yet so as they come most freely, being made willing by his grace.
( Romans 8:30; Romans 11:7; Ephesians 1:10, 11; 2 Thessalonians 2:13, 14; Ephesians 2:1-6; Acts 26:18; Ephesians 1:17, 18; Ezekiel 36:26; Deuteronomy 30:6; Ezekiel 36:27; Ephesians 1:19; Psalm 110:3; Song of Solomon 1:4 )
Not one single one of these verse makes a distinction between an effectual call and a general call (Not to mention that you are again quoting confessions like they are Scripture).

Not one single verse listed states that a man is MADE willing. Psalm 110:3 says that God's people "shall be willing". It doesn't say "shall be MADE willing". The confession added this in a creed and quoted it as if it read like that in the Bible. Furthermore it is THE DAY of Thy power, not each time a sinner gets saved. THE DAY is a future prophetic event, has nothing to do with God predestinating individual sinners.

Ezekiel 36:26 is about ISRAEL not the church. It is plain throughout the entire chapter "the house of ISRAEL".

Acts 26:18 is referring to God now offering salvation to non Jews (v 17) and doesn't help Calvinism because they are sanctified BY FAITH, not determinism. Paul states in verse 19 "I was not DISOBEDIENT unto the heavenly vision" which clearly demonstrates that PAUL HAD A CHOICE.

And Song of Solomon 1:4? Really??? This is almost as bad as reading Bride Chamber Theology into the text.

Romans 11:7 is the worst possible verse they could have used to support this, because this verse shows a clear difference in the VARIOUS elect of the Bible. In Calvinist, all elect will be saved, and if this verse is used to support that the Church is the elect, and the rest are blinded, then there's a problem because Israel was called God's elect in Isaiah 45 and many other passages.

The proper interpretation of this verse is that this refers to ISRAEL AS A WHOLE did not obtain what they sought for (the Kingdom, Matthew 24:1-3, Acts 1:6), because they WOULD NOT (Matthew 23:39) and the REMNANT that will be saved during the tribulation will obtain it (vs 5). Romans 11:7 is not about the church, it's about a REMNANT OF ISRAELITES, PAUL'S KINSMEN "ACCORDING TO THE FLESH" (Rom 9:3). Israel is going to be "raised from the dead" during the tribulation (Rom 11:15) when the gospel turns away from the Gentiles after the "times of the Gentiles" is completed, and then 144,000 Jews are sealed (Rev 7:4-8) to be witnesses lead by the 2 witnesses of Revelation 11:3 (Moses and Elijah).

Notice the analogy that Paul uses is of an elect WITHIN AN ELECT that were reserved for the battle, at the beginning of the chapter. The analogy was based on 1 Kings 19 where God chose from Israel (His elect) 7,000 ISRAELITES to battle. Now it never says that ONLY 7000 did not bow down to Baal, but that he used 7000 that didn't.

Romans 11:7 is NOT THE INDIVIDUAL CHRISTIANS IN THE CHURCH. Beginning in Romans 9-11, this fact is made clear. It is only when verses are isolated out of context, and out of their intended historical and future context that false doctrine is built around private interpretations inserted into Scripture.

None of the other verses support anything said in that "confession" and I will get to the rest of those later.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No brass ring

Does not God use the irrational to confound the wise? Perhaps a cautious theologian would place more belief in what they consider irrational merely because God said it. Human understanding is not to be compared to God's and God doesn't have to answer, "Why."
The foolish things of the world are according to the world's value system, like you trying to sell a pig in a poke. Calvinism is irrational foolishness, but we are to be sober minded.
This is good preaching, Van. However, it is not OUR faith, but our belief that counts. Paul stated, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." Faith and belief are not synonymous - though some take them to be. Faith is of God. Man has human faith that is faulty and frail, however the faith in which God instills and the believer cries out in belief does not fail. God cannot credit humankind faith but as sinful and unworthy. Salvation is totally of God.

Here we get another redefinition of a word, faith is simply the noun form of the verb believe. So if you believe in the truth, you have faith in the truth. The idea that the noun refers to divine belief, and the verb belongs to human belief is without merit.

Next, our all-powerful God is said to be unable to credit our faith in Christ as righteousness. Scripture, Romans 4:4-5,24 says He does. Romans 5:2 says our faith in Christ provides our access to the grace in which we stand. Thus we are saved by grace through our faith that God credited as righteousness.

This is true. However, because man is incapable and had no innate ability to self reconcile with God in their fallen nature, then it follows that even the belief expressed is in response to the faith given by God. "For without faith it is impossible to please Him" FOLLOWS belief according to Hebrews 11.
No one said man has the ability to self reconcile. Why do you keep changing the subject. Scripture says men received the gospel with joy. Scripture says 3 of the 4 soils could understand the gospel. Scripture says men seek God both through works and through faith. Calvinism's claims are completely false. There is no support in scripture for Calvinism, at least the TULI part of the tulip.

2 Thessalonians 2:13 (which we discussed for many posts) states:

"But we should always give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation through (in) sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth."

So what must be present at salvation according to this verse?

1) God has to chose the person FROM THE BEGINNING. - this is not corporate, but individuals that are chosen.
2) Sanctification (not a movement but a declaration) by the Spirit.
3) There must be faith in the truth.​

All true, no one said 2 Thessalonians 2:13 was a corporate election, it is our individual election for salvation, a conditional election.

NOTE: see the work of the Spirit BEFORE faith in the truth? It is that work in the humankind that enables them to hear the truth and express what is already in their heart as to salvation.
Yes the order of the steps presented is important and should be given weight. For example, many are called but few are chosen, certainly suggests God chooses from among the called.

However in this verse we get the clause through the sanctification by the spirit and faith in the truth, presented in parallel, i.e. both are the objects of through. How are we set apart in Christ? The Holy Spirit baptizes us spiritually into Christ. This is the sanctification by the Spirit, and thus tells us how we are chosen. On what basis are we chosen. Through faith in the truth. And only those whose faith has been credited by God as righteousness are chosen. So the conditional election is by God alone, based on His actions alone. But He is honoring His promise, whoever believes in Him shall not perish.

Faith from God implanted into the humankind expresses true repentance unto salvation. Such is the faith of the great Hebrews 11 folks. It is that faith that not only broke down Jericho walls, but Christ said would move mountains.

No humankind faith is able to do what God's faith can easily accomplish.

The Hebrews 11 saints gained approval through faith. Your view has them approved unconditionally, then given faith. Not how it reads. No one is claiming our faith accomplishes salvation, it is God who credits or not our filthy rag faith as righteousness. Again, if the faith had been implanted, there would be no need for God to credit it as righteousness, it would already be righteous divine faith.

Bottom line, Calvinism is deeply embedded in your understanding of scripture, so I doubt anything I say will be received with joy. :)
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Note: Van's quotes from his post are edited to heighten the focus the shorten the total length of this post.

...Calvinism is irrational foolishness, but we are to be sober minded.

Because some do view "Calvinism (as) irrational foolishness" it really does seem that often on this board contention on the board centers upon some distortion of the non-cal or cal view.

Just because some have a non-cal view does not mean that all hold to all that is contained in a systematic theology that ultimately leads to Universalism.

Most Calvinistic thinking folks have a modified view of what is called Calvinism. I dare say that on the BB there is actually no one that would not sincerely contend with Calvin, himself, over some doctrine that he maintained.

For instance, I personally have taught both perseverance and preservation as one not existing without the other. Some would disagree with that view.

I hold a view that some moderate Calvinistic thinkers are not comfortable with, that the heathen is not just unable but totally incapable of free choice / free will. That all choices the heathen make are a selection of options that are fallen and in line with the natural which ultimately lead to decay and destruction. Of course, the Hollywood versions and their theological schemes have totally rejected this view.

... faith is simply the noun form of the verb believe. So if you believe in the truth, you have faith in the truth...

There is a distinction. The scriptures state clearly that even the demonic world believe. One can believe a truth, or believe something occurred... and never have the ability to exercise the faith because that is given by God.


Next, our all-powerful God is said to be unable to credit our faith in Christ as righteousness. Scripture, Romans 4:4-5,24 says He does. Romans 5:2 says our faith in Christ provides our access to the grace in which we stand. Thus we are saved by grace through our faith that God credited as righteousness.

Folks, this passage is sharing the experience of Abraham. Because Van considers faith as man generated ability to depend upon God, his view of Abram is that Abraham used his own ability irregardless of the the fallen nature being unable and incapable of receiving the things of God.

Van, it was not Abraham's unique ability, but the faith that God put in Abraham when he claimed him as His - at the call to leave from is own home to wander in "no continual dwelling place." This is the same faith that ALL believers have given to them, that the believer might walk by faith that God is faithful.

A passage that explains this is found in Romans 1:

16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believes; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

17 For therein is revealed a righteousness of God from faith unto faith: as it is written, But the righteous shall live by faith.

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hinder the truth in unrighteousness;

19 because that which is known of God is manifest in them; for God manifested it unto them.


Scripture says 3 of the 4 soils could understand the gospel.
But "understanding" is mental ability - it is not salvation.
Scripture says men seek God both through works and through faith. Calvinism's claims are completely false. There is no support in scripture for Calvinism, at least the TULI part of the tulip.

Perhaps you can show me were men (all humankind) seek God when the Scriptures clearly teach just the opposite.

You again are making a claim about Calvinism that is unsupportable, and not really important to the discussion. Of course one could state that because you seem to agree with the "P" part that you are a one point Calvinist. :)



How are we set apart in Christ? The Holy Spirit baptizes us spiritually into Christ. This is the sanctification by the Spirit, and thus tells us how we are chosen. On what basis are we chosen. Through faith in the truth. And only those whose faith has been credited by God as righteousness are chosen. So the conditional election is by God alone, based on His actions alone. But He is honoring His promise, whoever believes in Him shall not perish.

Sounds like you are more Calvanistic that you want to let on. :)

All you have to do is come to understand that the "faith" that allows us to embrace the truth is that which God generates with in the elected ones. For instance, in the account of Saul's conversion on the road to Damascus, the folks that traveled with Saul heard the voice and therefore understood what was spoken to Saul. Why then were they not converted? Only Saul had been kicking against the pricks (conviction of the truth brought by the Holy Spirit).

The Hebrews 11 saints gained approval through faith. Your view has them approved unconditionally, then given faith. Not how it reads. ...

Bottom line, Calvinism is deeply embedded in your understanding of scripture, so I doubt anything I say will be received with joy. :)

If your view is true, then we should see the lack of need for earth moving equipment. Man's own ability to exercise man's faith could move mountains, stop the mouths of lions, and proclaim (irregardless of the presence of the Holy Spirit) unto salvation.

But that isn't the case, is it. Rather, just the opposite.

So, even in the practical world system, your view isn't supportable.

Rather than harping a dirge against Calvinism, why not merely promote your view of Scriptures.

I generally receive responses to my posts with joy, because at my age just having someone of your obvious ability respond is great encouragement. We may not agree on some matters, but then in a few moments of time it will all be settled. We probably will find we are both wrong with Peter and Paul both ready to say, "You foolish gentiles! Can't you read!" :)
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Now we can agree to disagree :thumbsup:

Greek: mia gar prosphora teteleioken (3SRAI) eis to dienekes tous agiazomenous. (PPPMPA)
Amplified: For by a single offering He has forever completely cleansed and perfected those who are consecrated and made holy. (Amplified Bible - Lockman)
Barclay: For by one offering and for all time he perfectly gave us that cleansing we need to enter into the presence of God. (Westminster Press)
NLT: For by that one offering he perfected forever all those whom he is making holy. (NLT - Tyndale House)
Phillips: For by virtue of that one offering he has perfected for all time every one whom he makes holy. (Phillips: Touchstone)
Wuest: for by one offering He has brought to completion forever those who are set apart for God and His service. (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: for by one offering he hath perfected to the end those sanctified

Still doesn't say what you are imposing on that verse. And quite frankly you have not made it clear how you even came to that conclusion.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Agedman said:
There is a distinction. The scriptures state clearly that even the demonic world believe. One can believe a truth, or believe something occurred... and never have the ability to exercise the faith because that is given by God.
The distinction is between the verb, an action to believe in something, and the noun, what is believed, thus if you believe in Christ, you have faith in Christ.
It is up to God to credit that faith as righteousness.

Folks, this passage is sharing the experience of Abraham. Because Van considers faith as man generated ability to depend upon God, his view of Abram is that Abraham used his own ability irregardless of the the fallen nature being unable and incapable of receiving the things of God.
Scripture does not say fallen men are unable to receive all things of God. Fallen men are unable to receive spiritual meat, but are able to understand spiritual milk, as taught in 1 Corinthians 3:1 where Paul speaks to born anew folks as to men of flesh, demonstrating men of flesh can understand milk. Calvinism is based on mistaken claims like fallen men cannot understand any of the things of the Spirit including milk. Simply untrue.

Romans 1:16-19 does not support Irresistible grace at all. It does support the grace of God in revealing Himself to man in various ways, including the gospel of Christ as scripture. Here the effort is to claim when God reveals something to a person, the person is compelled to believe. Pure fiction. Jesus revealed God to men but many men did not believe. God is a God of persuasion, he does not compel men to believe. That again is the Calvinist fiction, nowhere found in scripture.

Understanding does not equate with salvation. Of course it does not.

Yes, I am a one point Calvinist, but many non-Cals believe in once saved always saved.

All you have to do is come to understanding that the "faith" that allows us to embrace the truth is that which God generates with in the elected ones.
This is wrong on so many levels, lets count the ways:
(1) Faith comes from hearing the word of God, i.e. faith in Christ comes from hearing and understanding and embracing the gospel of Christ. Calvinism's fiction says no one can embrace unless altered, but 3 or the 4 soils of Matthew 13 did embrace to a degree the gospel of Christ, i.e. received it with joy.

(2) We are elected through faith, thus faith precedes our individual election, 2 Thessalonians 2:13. Calvinism gets the cart before the horse because it claims the corporate election of Ephesians 1:4 was individual. But verse after verse after verse teach God chooses individuals during their lifetime, after they have lived without mercy, such as James 2:5, 1 Peter 2:9-10 and 1 Corinthians 1:26-31.

(3) In Matthew 23:13 we have people entering heaven, thus having faith in God to some degree, yet are blocked by false teachings. Thus their faith was not instilled, and the grace of the revelation upon which they based their faith was not irresistible. This one verse teaches Calvinism's "T" and "I" are unbiblical.​

If your view is true, then we should see the lack of need for earth moving equipment. Man's own ability to exercise man's faith could move mountains, stop the mouths of lions, and proclaim (irregardless of the presence of the Holy Spirit) unto salvation.
Wrong again, my view is not that our faith saves us, but rather God saves us after crediting our worthless filthy rag faith as righteousness.
 

DrJamesAch

New Member
Still doesn't say what you are imposing on that verse. And quite frankly you have not made it clear how you even came to that conclusion.

He posted it in a different thread under Hebrews 10:14. http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=86595 HOwever, doesn't explain how he reached the conclusion in that thread either. But the Greek structure of the sentence works against him, not for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He posted it in a different thread under Hebrews 10:14. http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=86595 HOwever, doesn't explain how he reached the conclusion in that thread either. But the Greek structure of the sentence works against him, not for him.

He posted that in this thread first but the problem is that verse does not say what he is imposing on it. He is trying to make an inference that is not there nor is it in view. This is common in reformed theology.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
I have read many threads on free will vs. election on this board. I did not realize how many Baptist really believe that only certain ones are chosen and others are rejected, because of what ground? Is it their sin? Is it that God shows favoritism?

I thought we were all sinners? I thought Christ died for all sinners? I thought God called all to repentance? I would like to hear from some of those that believe this. Be elementary with me because I have never discussed or searched this out or saw a need to. (Please give only milk concerning this subject...lol)

First question I have is where does it say Christ only died for a few?

If Christ died for all sinners then no one could go to hell. What would they go to hell for? For sin? Not if Christ died for their sins.

EVERYBODY believes that God elected ONLY SOME. Arminians believe that God elected those he foresaw would repent and trust in him.

Once again, if God elected every single person, then every single person would be in heaven in the end and no one would be in hell. If you don't believe that everyone ggoes to heaven, then you cannot believe that God elected every single person.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If Christ died for all sinners then no one could go to hell. What would they go to hell for? For sin? Not if Christ died for their sins.

EVERYBODY believes that God elected ONLY SOME. Arminians believe that God elected those he foresaw would repent and trust in him.

Once again, if God elected every single person, then every single person would be in heaven in the end and no one would be in hell. If you don't believe that everyone ggoes to heaven, then you cannot believe that God elected every single person.

Well done Rick.....and in 3 paragraphs too! :smilewinkgrin:
 

awaken

Active Member
If Christ died for all sinners then no one could go to hell. What would they go to hell for? For sin? Not if Christ died for their sins.
Just because he died for all...does not mean all will accept the free gift! He made salvation possible for all! But only a few will accept! We do not go to hell because we sin...we go to hell because we reject Jesus Christ!

EVERYBODY believes that God elected ONLY SOME. Arminians believe that God elected those he foresaw would repent and trust in him.
He still died for all..the world...but only a few will recieve.

Once again, if God elected every single person, then every single person would be in heaven in the end and no one would be in hell. If you don't believe that everyone ggoes to heaven, then you cannot believe that God elected every single person.
I am in the process of studing this and have looked up every verse that mentions "elect" in those verses. Still not through them all! I do not believe all go to heaven...because not all will receive the price that was paid on the cross! Some are trying to get there on their own good works! It is through faith in what Jesus paid for!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top