Eccelente!
There is an example of this one verse (well 2)
" For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again." 2 Cor 5:14
Here you have those who were dead, ALL DEAD compared with those who Christ died for ALL.
Then verse 15 refers to those the ones Christ died for and FOLLOWED HIM.
The Calvinist method is to show that since since v 15 says "to THEM" that is excluding that ALL of verse 14.
Illustration:
A CEO has a meeting with his employees, gathers them all in a big room, 500 capacity. The CEO tells ALL OF THEM "I am offering ALL OF YOU a bonus check if you want it, but you will have to come receive it in the back room in 15 minutes".
Fifteen minutes later, 200 employees meet the CEO in the back room and receive their check. The CEO makes a speech, "I offered you a gift and ALL OF YOU received it".
Now, when the CEO said this to the 200, did that mean that he did NOT offer it to ALL 500? No, it was
offered to all, but only some CHOSE to receive it.
The newspapers then read, "CE
FFERS MAJOR BONUS CHECK TO 500 PEOPLE". Even though there were only 200 people that received it, that the CEO spoke to both 200 people, and 500 both at the same time is not a contradiction. If the CEO said that he offered the check ONLY to 200 people, and 500 at the same time, then you have an explicit contradiction.
Do not fall for the Calvinist "sleight of hand" interpretation of scripture. Jesus offered a bonus check for ALL even though only some choose to receive the check.