You can show Christ in Freemasonry even the SBC presents Christ in Freemasonry he is one that the SBC states:
(I am the resurrection and the life, saith the Lord. He that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.)
Now the things the SBc does not like:
1. The prevalent use of offensive concepts, titles, and terms such as Worshipful Master for the leader of a lodge; references to their buildings as mosques, shrines, or temples; and the use of words such as Abaddon and Jah-Bul-On, the so-called secret name of God. To many, these terms are not only offensive but sacrilegious.
A: The Titles used are from the 17th cent and eariler. The term Worshipful means repectable. As far as terms given to Lodges is to represent Peace and Brotherly Love. As far as Jah-Bul-On this is not in the Blue Lodge Abaddon more info is needed. But the SBC does not say it is wrong but says by many they are concider offensive and Sacrilegious. But if they would do research it would not be to them.
2. The use of archaic, offensive rituals and so-called bloody oaths or obligations, among these being that promised by the Entered Apprentice:
Oaths are debatable we take them every day. The Oaths of Freemasonry are to say you will protect others no matter what Just as a Marriage Vow (Which is an Oath) you promise to protect even at the cost of your own life.
3. The recommended readings, in pursuance of advanced degrees, of religions and philosophies, which are undeniably pagan and/or occultic, such as much of the writings of Albert Pike, Albert Mackey, Manly Hall, Rex Hutchins, W.L. Wilmshurst, and other such authors; along with their works, such as Morals and Dogma, A Bridge to Light, An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, and The Meaning of Masonry.
I have not read any of these Books and none of them were recommended to me. But the One that was recommended to me and is not mentioned by the SBC the Holy Bible, Born in the Blood and Freemasonry and Fundimentlism. It should have been noted that a Majority of Masons do not recommend Morals and Dogma.
4. The reference to the Bible placed on the altar of the lodge as the furniture of the lodge, comparing it to the square and compass rather than giving it the supreme place in the lodge.13
I would disagree with this as the Bible is called the Great Light of Freemasonry. But if you aplly this rule to the Lodge than you must apply it to yourself. It you are asked about what is in your House, Office or Car while you have a Bible in each Location and you say your stuff is in there without giving a Supreme Place to the bible than you are error. I do not think this is really an issue.
5. The prevalent use of the term Alight, which some may understand as a reference to salvation rather than knowledge or truth.
Opnion of the SBC, Again where it can be taken out of context. Even the SBC recognizes its meaning as Knowledge not Salvation
6. The implication that salvation may be attained by one's good works, implicit in the statement found in some Masonic writings that Masonry is continually reminded of that purity of life and conduct which is necessary to obtain admittance into the Celestial Lodge above where the Supreme Architect of the Universe presides.14 Even though many Masons understand that the purity of life and conduct can only be achieved through faith in Jesus Christ, others may be led to believe they can earn salvation by living a pure life with good conduct.
SBC does not like it because some may take it as a Salvation by Works. Even thou Freemaosnry states it does not and that You can not get to Heaven by Good Works.
7. The heresy of universalism (the belief all people will eventually be saved), which permeates the writings of many Masonic authors, which is a doctrine inconsistent with New Testament teaching
I am not sure this is the case maybe the contraversal Authurs. But writtenings of Others are dead on with the Teachings of the New Testiment and many Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ and Majority of Masons are Christian.
8. The refusal of most lodges (although not all) to admit for membership African-Americans.)
I will not deny this as this is not something confind to Freemasonry. But the Teachings of Freemaosnry are that all are Equal no matter the Shade of Skin. The poeple who will not allow a good person of any Skin shade is not follwing the teachings of Freemasonry and should not be one. I have voice my opnion on this issue and have told people that people like that should not be Masons for they do not belong.