NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
The topic here is Gail Riplinger - not the KJV. Lets stay on topic please.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I thought it was roby who related Joan Jett and Riplinger to be somewhat the same?C4K said:The topic here is Gail Riplinger - not the KJV. Lets stay on topic please.
While I object with you to the verses missing from many versions (being a Byzantine text man myself), I think the term "New Age Bible" is just ridiculous, and is embarassing to many of us who prefer the beloved KJV. The very idea that the truths of God's Word, even translated poorly, somehow teach New Age doctrine is beyond the pale.DJ N'LyTe said:Ive watched some of her stuff while I agree she does take some stuff to far but shes dead on on the new age bible versions being wrong. I mean how do you justify 16 verses missing from NIV, Jesus being demoted the blood being removed, fasting being removed the NIV and NLV saying Jesus fell from heaven.
Look at your KJV again. It specifically says, "But I suffer not a woman to teach (not "be a preacher," as you put it), nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1 Tim. 2:12). I'd say you don't know your KJV Bible very well if you think this doesn't forbid what Riplinger does. She is in direct violation of the Word of God, and is not worthy of any respect until she publicly repents.She also never claims to be a preacher shes a teacher and theres a big difference and the bible doesnt say anything about that. The new version are simply good translations of the wrong manuscripts check out this video its only 6 minutes long and it has nothing to do with Riplinger just quick history lesson http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ykbnIQocq0
John of Japan said:While I object with you to the verses missing from many versions (being a Byzantine text man myself), I think the term "New Age Bible" is just ridiculous, and is embarassing to many of us who prefer the beloved KJV. The very idea that the truths of God's Word, even translated poorly, somehow teach New Age doctrine is beyond the pale.
Look at your KJV again. It specifically says, "But I suffer not a woman to teach (not "be a preacher," as you put it), nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1 Tim. 2:12). I'd say you don't know your KJV Bible very well if you think this doesn't forbid what Riplinger does. She is in direct violation of the Word of God, and is not worthy of any respect until she publicly repents.
That's not the IFB movement you and I grew up with, is it Roger? :tonofbricks:C4K said:Good words John. I have never sat under her teaching, then again I would not do so. I have seen videos of her teaching in churches and getting amens from the assembled crowd. I have never understood why she is the only woman allowed to do so in fundamental circles.
John of Japan said:That's not the IFB movement you and I grew up with, is it Roger? :tonofbricks:
John of Japan said:That's not the IFB movement you and I grew up with, is it Roger? :tonofbricks:
We'll not despise your youth--son! :thumbs:tinytim said:I know I am MUCH younger than you two, but can I jump in here too, :1_grouphug: and say it is not the same IFBs I grew up with also...:wavey:
I think you're awarding her some sort of fame, she, or anyone else who has her speak, never claims.John of Japan said:While I object with you to the verses missing from many versions (being a Byzantine text man myself), I think the term "New Age Bible" is just ridiculous, and is embarassing to many of us who prefer the beloved KJV. The very idea that the truths of God's Word, even translated poorly, somehow teach New Age doctrine is beyond the pale.
Look at your KJV again. It specifically says, "But I suffer not a woman to teach (not "be a preacher," as you put it), nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1 Tim. 2:12). I'd say you don't know your KJV Bible very well if you think this doesn't forbid what Riplinger does. She is in direct violation of the Word of God, and is not worthy of any respect until she publicly repents.
Is this done during the worship service, or is it an after hours meeting?C4K said:Good words John. I have never sat under her teaching, then again I would not do so. I have seen videos of her teaching in churches and getting amens from the assembled crowd. I have never understood why she is the only woman allowed to do so in fundamental circles.
Salamander said:Is this done during the worship service, or is it an after hours meeting?
Some IFB won't even let a woman on the platform.![]()
Salamander said:Is this done during the worship service, or is it an after hours meeting?
Some IFB won't even let a woman on the platform.![]()
I guess my momma is now a rebel and possibly a reprobate for teaching me to brush my teeth.C4K said:"But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to vsurpe authoritie ouer the man, but to be in silence vnless it bee outside a church service, than shee is permitted even though it still appeareth as a service."
Is that your interpretation of the passage?
I suppose you have never been taught anything by a woman ever.tinytim said:Oh, the loopholes we seek to promote our pet doctrines!
"She's not preaching'
She is teaching...
But only when the service is not officially labelled a "Worship" service...
And she is not "usurping" because she is not being crafty...
Listen, it is as simple as this... IF you believe a woman should not be teaching a man, you cannot support her, unless she teaches only women...
Anything other than this, you are being hypocritical in your beliefs....
Salamander said:I guess my momma is now a rebel and possibly a reprobate for teaching me to brush my teeth.
The verse has to do with order of service, not casual meetings or study groups.
C4K said:Your momma taught you how to brush your teeth when you were a grown man?