Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why is there a statute of a man who has no reason to be celebrated in the first place?
Because there is an epidemic of stupid in this nation. Stupid people doing stupid things and stupider people who know better going along with them.Why is there a statute of a man who has no reason to be celebrated in the first place?
He would be against vaccine passports.It is interesting how people choose their "heros". Often the man has little to do with the ideals of the statues erected in their honor.
One of my childhood heros was Francis Marion. I still like the image I grew fond of. But the truth is while he was an American hero (particularly for a SC guy like me) he really was not a good man.
No. He would be hunting people down and jabbing them with the needle. He was vicious, but he was a smart man and a patriot.He would be against vaccine passports.

If the govt ordered vaccines and tried to force them, he would be in direct opposition to them.No. He would be hunting people down and jabbing them with the needle. He was vicious, but he was a smart man and a patriot.![]()
Depends on the government. He was loyal to his countrymen, just not England. Most likely he would have seen the vaccine rejections as traitors to his countrymen and a threat to the revolution.If the govt ordered vaccines and tried to force them, he would be in direct opposition to them.
I don't think you have read the 900 page biography of him have you? He would see any edict from a central govt as a tyranical order and rebel against it. It could be debated how he would handle the order if it came from the govt of S.C.Depends on the government. He was loyal to his countrymen, just not England. Most likely he would have seen the vaccine rejections as traitors to his countrymen and a threat to the revolution.
He would have probably just killed them so the country would survive. Like I said, not a particularly good man. Just good at what he did.
I have. But he was not a foolish man. He would have realized the war would have been lost should the vaccine rejections prevail. He would have seen them as an inside threat.I don't think you have read the 900 page biography of him have you? He would see any edict from a central govt as a tyranical order and rebel against it. It could be debated how he would handle the order if it came from the govt of S.C.

Oh brother. There is literally ZERO reason for him to have a statute.George Floyd was, by all accounts, a drug user and career criminal. But he represents to many the struggle against brutality.
The fact that anyone even thought of having a statute of Floyd is a disgrace to this nation.I think they could have tossed a dart and found a better representation of those ideas. But that's not for me to decide.
Why in the world did this turn into a thread about vaccines?
Oh now you believe in freedom?.but this is a free nation.